Skip to main content
Log in

Alterations in ileoanal pouch technique, 1980 to 1987

Complications and functional outcome

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

This study presents the results of 82 ileoanal pouch operations (57 S, 25 J) performed from 1980 to 1987. It also reports the development of the operative technique during these years. The functional outcome was evaluated in 66 patients followed for 2 to 84 months (mean, 23). The mean number of bowel movements per 24 hours was 5.0. Seventy-four percent of the patients had no leakage or staining and 82 percent had a deferral time of more than one hour. Nightly evacuations were significantly more common in men than in women. Leakage and short deferral time were significantly more common in patients over 40 years of age than in those under 25. Early experience with the S-pouch was encumbered by evacuation problems and ileoanal separations. Shortening of the efferent conduits and the muscle cuffs reduced these complications significantly. Postoperative continence was improved significantly after reduction of anal dilatation and preservation of the transitional zone. The length of bowel used for the double-loop reservoirs seemed to be of importance concerning frequency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Parks AG, Nicholls RJ. Proctocolectomy without ileostomy for ulcerative colitis. Br Med J 1978;2:85–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Utsunomiya J, Iwama T, Imajo M, et al. Total colectomy, mucosal proctectomy, and ileoanal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 1980;23:459–66.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Peck DA. Rectal mucosal replacement. Ann Surg 1980;191:294–303.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Fonkalsrud EW. Total colectomy and endorectal ileal pullthrough with internal ileal reservoir for ulcerative colitis. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1980;150:1–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lindquist K, Liljeqvist L, Sellberg B. The topography of ileoanal reservoirs in relation to evacuation patterns and clinical functions. Acta Chir Scand 1984;150:573–579.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lindquist K, Nilsell K, Liljeqvist L. Cuff abscesses and ileoanal anastomotic separation in pelvic pouch surgery: an analysis of possible etiologic factors. Dis Colon Rectum 1987;30:355–59.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Liljeqvist L, Lindquist K. A reconstructive operation on malfunctioning S-shaped pelvic reservoirs. Dis Colon Rectum 1985;28:506–511.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Finlay IG, Carter K, McLeod I. A comparison of intrarectal infusion of gas and mass on anorectal angle and anal canal pressure. Lecture at the 86th annual meeting of American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons 1987.

  9. Parks AG, Nicholls RJ, Belliveau P. Proctocolectomy with ileal reservoir and anal anastomosis. Br J Surg 1980;67:533–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Becker JM, Raymond JL. Heal pouch-anal anastomosis: a single surgeon's experience with 100 consecutive cases. Ann Surg 1986;204:375–83.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Nicholls RJ, Pezim ME. Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal reservoir for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis: a comparison of three reservoir designs. Br J Surg 1985;72:470–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Rothenberger DA, Wong WD, Buls JG, Goldberg SM. The S ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. In: Dozois RR, ed. Alternatives to conventional ileostomy. Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers, Inc., 1985;345–62.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Martin LW, Fischer JE, Sayers HJ, Alexander F, Torres MA. Anal continence following Soave procedure: analysis of results in 100 patients. Ann Surg 1986;203:525–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Stone MM, Lewin K, Fonkalsrud EW. Late obstruction of the lateral ileal reservoir after colectomy and endorectal ileal pullthrough procedures. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1986;162:411–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. O'Connell PR, Pemberton JH, Brown ML, Kelly KA. Determinants of stool frequency after ileal-anal anastomosis. Am J Surg 1987;153:157–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. McHugh SM, Diamant NE, McLeod R, Cohen Z. S-pouchesvs. J-pouches: a comparison of functional outcomes. Dis Colon Rectum 1987;30:671–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Beart RW, Metcalf AM, Dozois RR, Kelly KA. The J ileal pouchanal anastomosis: the Mayo clinic experience. In: Dozois RR, ed. Alternatives to conventional ileostomy. Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers, Inc., 1985;384–97.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Keighley MR. Abdominal mucosectomy reduces the incidence of soiling and sphincter damage after restorative proctocolectomy and J-pouch. Dis Colon Rectum 1987;30:386–90.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Snooks S, Henry MM, Swash M. Faecal incontinence after anal dilatation. Br J Surg 1984;71:617–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Miller R, Bartolo DCC, Mortensen NJ McC, et al. Does preservation of the anal transitional zone influence sensation after ileoanal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis: clinical controversies in inflammatory bowel diseases. September 9–11, 1987, Bologna, Italy. Abstract Book, p. 205.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Poster presentation at the meeting of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Houston, Texas, May 11 to 15, 1986.

About this article

Cite this article

Jeqvist, L.L., Lindquist, K. & Ljungdahl, I. Alterations in ileoanal pouch technique, 1980 to 1987. Dis Colon Rectum 31, 929–938 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02554888

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02554888

Key words

Navigation