Skip to main content
Log in

Laboratory aid in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis

A blinded, prospective trial concerning diagnostic value of leukocyte count, neutrophil differential count, and C-reactive protein

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

The diagnostic value of C-reactive protein (CRP), total white blood cell (WBC) count, total neutrophil count, and neutrophil differential count were evaluated in a prospective blinded study of 204 patients submitted with the tentative diagnosis of acute appendicitis. The laboratory tests were performed on blood samples obtained at the time of admission, and the results were stored until the patients were discharged. One hundred patients were operated on: 59 had appendicitis, 3 had other surgically correctable diseases, and 38 had a superfluous exploration. All 104 nonoperated patients recovered spontaneously. The sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of single tests and test combinations were calculated at different cutoff levels. Using standard reference intervals, WBC count demonstrated the best sensitivity (83 percent) and predictive value of a negative result (88 percent). Combining the tests by an “or” rule enhanced the sensitivity to 100 percent, employing WBC count or CRP or neutrophil percentage above the reference range (triple test), but at the expense of the predictive value of a positive test (37 percent). It was concluded that both single tests and combined tests are of limited value in predicting acute appendicitis. However, the same triple test combination proved a predictive value of a negative result at 100 percent (95 percent confidence limits 92 to 100 percent), indicating that acute appendicitis is unlikely when these tests are simultaneously negative. The triple test combination was valid in 32 percent of the patients who were free from appendicitis. In the study group, 10 of the patients (25 percent) who had a superfluous exploration had a negative triple test, and they might have avoided surgery if it had been used. Therefore, the triple test is recommended as a help in reducing the significant rate of negative laparotomies in patients suspected of having acute appendicitis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jess P, Bjerregaard B, Brynitz S, Holst-Christensen J, Kalaja E, Lund-Kristensen J. Acute appendicitis: prospective trial concerning diagnostic accuracy and complications. Am J Surg 1981;141:232–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Van Way CW, Murphy JR, Dunn EL, Elerding SC. A feasibility study of computer aided diagnosis in appendicitis. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1982;155:685–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lichtner S, Pflantz M. Appendectomy in the Federal Republic of Germany. Med Care 1971;9:311–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chang FC, Hogle HH, Welling DR. The fate of the negative appendix. Am J Surg 1973;126:752–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lewis FR, Holcroft JW, Beoy J, Dunphy JE. Appendicitis: a critical review of diagnosis and treatment in 1000 cases. Arch Surg 1975;110:677–84.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mason LB, Deyden WE. Primary appendectomy. Am Surg 1976;42:239–43.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Teicher I, Landa B, Cohen M, Kabnick L, Wise L. Scoring systems to aid in diagnosis of appendicitis. Ann Surg; 1983;198:753–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Leape LL, Ramenofsky ML. Laparoscopy for questionable appendicitis: can it reduce the negative appendectomy rate?. Ann Surg 1980;191:410–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fee HJ, Jones PC, Kadell B, O'Connell TX. Radiologic diagnosis of appendicitis. Arch Surg 1977;112:742–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Alvarado A. A practical score for the early diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Ann Emerg Med 1986;15:557–64.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Nauta R, Magnant C. Observation versus operation for abdominal pain in the right lower quadrant: Roles of the clinical examination and the leukocyte count. Am J Surg 1986;151:746–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Miskowiak J, Burcharth F. The white cell count in acute appendicitis: a prospective blind study. Dan Med Bull 1982;29:210–11.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bolton JP, Craven ER, Croft RJ, Menzies-Gow N. An assessment of the value of the white cell count in the management of suspected acute appendicitis. Br J Surg 1975;62:906–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Raftery AT. The value of the leukocyte count in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Br J Surg 1976;63:143–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Marchand A, Van Lente F, Galen RS. The assessment of laboratory tests in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Am J Clin Pathol 1983;80:369–74.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kusherner I, Broder ML, Karp D. Control of the acute phase response: serum C-reactive protein kinetics after acute myocardial infarction. J Clin Invest 1978;61:235–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Peltola HO. C-reactive protein for rapid monitoring of infections of the central nervous system. Lancet 1982;1:980–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kazarian KK, Roeder NJ, Mersheimer WL. Decreasing mortality and increasing morbidity from acute appendicitis. Am J Surg 1970;119:681–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Mikaclsson C, Arnbjornsson E. The value of C-Reactive protein (CRP) determinations in patients with suspected appendicitis. Ann Chir Gynaecol 1984;73:281–4.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Peltola H, Ahlquist J, Rapola J, et al. C-reactive protein compared with white blood cell count and erythrocyte sedimentation rate in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in children. Acta Chir Scand 1986;152:55–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Van Lente F. Evaluation of the nephelometric assay of CRP using the Beckman ICS. Clin Chem 1981;27:1075.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Røndbjerg J, Christensen M, Reimer E. C-reactive protein in acute appendicitis: a prospective blind trial. Ugeskr Laeger 1985;147:1989–90.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Dueholm, S., Bagi, P. & Bud, M. Laboratory aid in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Dis Colon Rectum 32, 855–859 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02554555

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02554555

Key words

Navigation