Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of the Valtrac biofragmentable anastomosis ring with conventional suture and stapled anastomosis in colon surgery

Results of a prospective, randomized clinical trial

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

In a randomized, prospective study of 438 patients, the safety and efficacy of the Valtrac biofragmentable anastomotic ring (BAR) was compared with stapling and with conventional suture techniques. There was no significant difference in the morbidity, mortality, and clinical course of the patients. The BAR can effect reestablishment of intestinal continuity somewhat more rapidly, but its major advantage is its uniform applicability to all areas of the intestinal tract, except the low rectum.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hardy TG Jr, Pace WG, Maney JW, Katz AR, Kaganov AL. A biofragmentable ring for sutureless bowel anastomosis: an experimental study. Dis Colon Rectum 1985;28:484–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hardy TG Jr, Aguilar PS, Stewart WRC, et al. Initial clinical experience with a biofragmentable ring for sutureless bowel anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 1987;30:55–61.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Corman ML. In Colon and rectal surgery, 2nd ed. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott, 1989:428–35.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Manson PN, Corman ML, Coller JA, Veidenheimer MC. Anterion resection for adenocarcinoma: Lahey Clinic experience from 1963 through 1969. Am J Surg 1976;131:434–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Steinhagen RM, Weakley FL. Anastomosis to the rectum: operative experience. Dis Colon Rectum 1985;28:105–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bokey EL, Chapuis PH, Pheils MT. Elective resection for diverticular disease and carcinoma: comparison of postoperative morbidity and mortality. Dis Colon Rectum 1981;24:181–2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Everett WG, Friend PJ, Forty J. Comparison of stapling and hand-suture for left-sided large bowel anastomosis. Br J Surg 1986;73:345–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Detry RJ, Kestens PJ. Colorectal anastomoses with the EEA stapler. World J Surg 1981;5:739–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Waxman BP. Large bowel anastomosis. II. The circular staplers. Br J Surg 1983;70:64–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Heald RJ, Leicester RJ. The low stapled anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 1981;24:437–44.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Cade D, Gallagher P, Schofield PF, Turner L. Complications of anterior resection of the rectum using the EEA stapling device. Br J Surg 1981;68:339–40.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Chassin JL, Rifkind KM, Sussman B, et al. The stapled gastrointestinal tract anastomosis: incidence of postoperative complications compared with the suture anastomosis. Ann Surg 1978;188:689–96.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Beart RW Jr, Kelly KA. Randomized prospective evaluation of the EEA stapler for colorectal anastomoses. Am J Surg 1981;141:143–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Debas HT, Thomson FB. A critical review of colectomy with anastomosis. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1972;135:747–52.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hawley PR, Hunt TK, Dunphy JE. Infection: the cause of anastomotic breakdown: an experimental study. Proc R Soc Med 1970;63:752.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Schrock TR, Deveney CW, Dunphy JE. Factors contributing to leakage of colonic anastomoses. Ann Surg 1973;177:513–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Goligher JC, Graham NG, DeDombal FT. Anastomotic dehiscence after anterior resection of rectum and sigmoid. Br J Surg 1970;57:109–18.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Clark CG, Harris J, Elmasri S, et al. Polyglycolic-acid sutures and catgut in colonic anastomosis: a controlled clinical trial. Lancet 1972;2:1006–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Additional information

Only those investigators who contributed patients at the time of the analysis are included in this report. Please note that some investigators enrolled patients at more than one institution. Contributing Investigators: John J. Ferrara, M.D. and P. William Curreri, M.D., (University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL); Campbell Penfold, M.D., (Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia); H. Whitney Boggs, Jr., M.D., (Schumpert Medical Center, Shreveport, LA); C. H. Shatney, M.D. and Emmet F. Ferguson, Jr., M.D., (University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL); Mr. R. Leach, M.S., F.R.C.S. and Mr. J. Cahill, (Kingston Hospital, Kingston-Upon-Thames, Surrey, England); Philip J. Huber, Jr., M.D., (University of Texas Health Science Center, Dallas, TX); Thomas A. Fox, Jr., M.D., (Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI); Julius C. Bonello, M.D., (Carle Clinic, Urbana, IL); Professor J. C. Patel, (Hôpital Ambroise Paré, Boulogne, France); Charles D. Dietzen, M.D. and Charles Chappuis, M.D., (Louisiana State University Medical Center, New Orleans, LA); George J. Mastio, M.D., (Wesley Medical Center, Wichita, KS); H. Randolph Bailey, M.D., (Sharpstown General Hospital, Houston, TX); F. Carter Nance, m.D., (St. Barnabas Medical Center, Livingston, NJ); Alan M. Resnik, M.D., (Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA); Professor Dr. Christian Herfarth and Professor Dr. Michael Betzler, (Chirurgie universitat Klinik, Heidelberg, West Germany); Bernard J. Perey, M.D. and John P. Curry, M.D., (Victoria General Hospital, Halifax, Nova Scotia); Thomas R. Russell, M.D. and Michael E. Abel, M.D., (Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, CA); Richard P. Billingham, M.D., (Northwest Hospital, Seattle, WA); Raymond F. Crystal, M.D., (Morristown Memorial Hospital, Morristown, NJ), and John E. Ray, M.D., (Ochsner Clinic, New Orleans, LA).

Read at the meeting of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Anaheim, California, June 12 to 17, 1988.

About this article

Cite this article

Corman, M.L., Prager, E.D., Hardy, T.G. et al. Comparison of the Valtrac biofragmentable anastomosis ring with conventional suture and stapled anastomosis in colon surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 32, 183–187 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02554523

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02554523

Key words

Navigation