Skip to main content
Log in

Predictive value of plasma CEA levels: Preoperative prognosis and postoperative monitoring of patients with colorectal carcinoma

  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

Plasma CEA levels were determined in 280 patients with histologically proven colorectal carcinoma: in 180 once or twice preoperatively and repeatedly postoperatively, and in 100 postoperatively only. Preoperative levels correlated directly with surgical-pathologic state and inversely with the time of recurrence;i.e., groups of patients with more advanced stage showed higher proportion of elevated CEA levels, and patients with higher levels had recurrences earlier. Levels above 20 ng/ml were strongly suggestive of liver metastases or disseminated disease.

Postoperative plasma CEA levels displayed three patterns of variation. 1) Levels fluctuating within normal range, below 3.2 ng/ml, strongly evidenced that surgery was effective, and 2) those fluctuating below 7.5 ng/ml indicated usually nonmalignant concomitant disease; in either group no more than 10 per cent of the patients had recurrences. 3) Levels rising persistently from a postoperative nadir indicated recurrence or, when the rise was dramatic, liver metastases or disseminated cancer in at least 97 per cent of the patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wanebo HJ, Stearns M, Schwartz MK. Use of CEA as an indicator of early recurrence and as a guide to a selected second-look procedure in patients with colorectal cancer. Ann Surg 1978;188:481–93.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Astler VB, Coller FA. The prognostic significance of direct extension of carcinoma of the colon and rectum. Ann Surg 1954;139:846–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Dukes CE. The classification of cancer of the rectum. J Pathol 1932;35:323–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Turnbull RB Jr, Kyle K, Watson FR, Spratt J. Cancer of the colon: the influence of theno-touch isolation technic on survival rates. Ann Surg 1967;166:420–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ackerman LV, del Regato JA. Cancer: diagnosis, treatment and prognosis. 2nd ed. London: H Kimpton, 1954:171.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Broders AC, Buie LA, Laird DR. Prognosis in carcinoma of the rectum: a comparison of the Broders and Dukes methods of classification. JAMA 1940;115:1066–71.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Laskowski J. Podstawy mianownictwa i klasyfikacji raków z punktu widzenia morfologii. Klasyfikacja. Nowotwory 1932;7:119–27.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gold P, Freedman SO. Demonstration of tumor-specific antigens in human colonic carcinomata by immunological tolerance and absorption techniques. J Exp Med 1965;121:439–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Chu TM, Lavin P, Day J, et al. Carcinoembryonic antigen: prognosis and monitoring of cancer. In: Lehmann FG, ed. Carcino-embryonic proteins. Amsterdam: Elsevier/North Holland Biomedical Press, 1979, 1:55.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Herrera MA, Chu TM, Holyoke ED. Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) as a prognostic and monitoring test in clinically complete resection of colorectal carcinoma. Ann Surg 196;183:5–9.

  11. Koch M, McPherson TA. Predictive value of plasma CEA in patients with colorectal carcinoma. J Surg Oncol 1979;12:319–25.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Mach JP, Vienny H, Jaeger P, Haldemann B, Egely R, Pettavel J. Long-term follow-up of colorectal carcinoma patients by repeated CEA radioimmunoassay. Cancer 1978;42:1439–47.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Martin EW Jr, Cooperman M, Carey LC, et al. Sixty second look procedures indicated primarily by rise in serial carcinoembryonic antigen. J Surg Res 1980;28:389–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Martin EW Jr, James KK, Hurtubise PE, Catalano P, Minton JP. The use of CEA as an early indicator for gastrointestinal tumor recurrence and second-look procedures. Cancer 1977;39:440–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Moertel CG, Schutt AJ, Go VL. Carcinoembryonic antigen test for recurrent colorectal carcinoma: inadequacy for early detection. JAMA 1978;239:1065–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Nicholson JR, Aust JC. Rising carcinoembryonic antigen titers in colorectal carcinoma: an indication for the second-look procedure. Dis Colon Rectum 1978;21:163–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sorokin JJ, Sugarbaker PH, Zamcheck N, Pisick M, Kupchik HZ, Moore FD. Serial carcinoembryonic antigen assays: use in detection of cancer recurrence. JAMA 1974;228:49–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Staab HJ, Anderer FA, Stumpf E, et al. Postoperative CEA follow-up: disease progression and second-look operation. In: Lehmann FG, ed. Carcino-embryonic proteins. Amsterdam: Elsevier/North Holland Biomedical Press, 1979, 1:65.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Staab HJ, Anderer FA, Stumpf E, Fischer R. Carcinoembryonic antigen follow-up and selection of patients for second-look operation in management of gastrointestinal carcinoma. J Surg Oncol 1978;10:273–82.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Staab HJ, Anderer FA, Stumpf E, Fischer R. Slope analysis of the postoperative CEA time course and its possible application as an aid in diagnosis of disease progression in gastrointestinal cancer. Am J Surg 1978;136:322–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Wanebo HJ, Rao B, Pinsky CM, et al. Preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen level as a prognostic indicator in colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 1978;229:448–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Winawer SJ. Colorectal neoplasia: current techniques for early diagnosis. NY State J Med 1978;78:1892–4.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Zamcheck N. The present status of CEA in diagnosis, prognosis, and evaluation of therapy. Cancer 1975;36:2460–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Hirai H. A collaborative clinical study of carcinoembryonic antigen in Japan. Cancer Res 1977;37:2267–74.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Radwan MW, Hahn L, Szymendera J. Automatyczne przetwarzanie danych w metodach radiokompetycyjnych. Post Fiz Med 1979;14:61–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Radwan MW, Hahn L, Szymendera J. Computer program for standard curve fitting and dose interpolation of immunoradiometric “sandwich” assay of CEA: comparison of two fitting models (abstr). Eur J Nucl Med 1979;4:415.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Snedecor GW, Cochran WG. Statistical methods. 6th ed. Ames, Iowa: The Iowa State University Press, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Patton DD. Introduction to clinical decision making. Semin Nucl Med 1978;8:273–82.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Koszarowski T, Gadomska H, Wronkowski Z, et al. Cancer in Poland, City of Warsaw and selected rural areas, 1963–72. Warsaw: Polish Medical Publishers, 1977:273.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Jubert AV, Talbott TM, Maycroft TM. Characteristics of adenocarcinomas of the colorectum with low levels of preoperative plasma carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). Cancer 1978;42:635–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Wangensteen OH, Lewis FJ, Tongen LA. “Second-look” in cancer surgery: patient with colic cancer and involved lymph nodes negative on “sixth look”. J Lancet 1951;1:303–7.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Supported by grant PR-6/0209 awarded by the Polish National Cancer Program. Also aided by the National Cancer Institute, NIH, DHEW, under the US-Poland Cancer Program.

About this article

Cite this article

Szymendera, J.J., Nowacki, M.P., Szawlowski, A.W. et al. Predictive value of plasma CEA levels: Preoperative prognosis and postoperative monitoring of patients with colorectal carcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum 25, 46–52 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02553548

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02553548

Key words

Navigation