Skip to main content
Log in

The Ripstein procedure: A 16-year experience

  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

A retrospective study was undertaken, evaluating 54 patients who underwent 57 Ripstein procedures at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation during the years 1963–1978. The patients were evaluated for their preoperative characteristics as well as early and late postoperative results. Patients who experience procidentia are generally middle-aged women who have had significant disorders of bowel function. Although the operative mortality was zero, and the majority of patients were satisfied with the results of their Ripstein procedure, there was significant operative morbidity (26 per cent). Twelve and one-half per cent of patients had recurrent rectal prolapse, and 18 per cent of patients had significant long-term obstructive symptoms. The Ripstein procedure still remains the treatment of choice for rectal prolapse.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ripstein CB, Lanter B. Etiology and surgical therapy of massive prolapse of the rectum. Ann Surg 1963;157:259–64.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ripstein CB. Surgical care of massive rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 1965;8:34–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. goldberg SM. Procidentia of the rectum (symposium). Dis Colon Rectum 1975;18:457–60.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Biehl AG, Ray JE, Gathright JB Jr. Repair of rectal prolapse: experience with the Ripstein sling. South Med J 1978;71:923–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bomar RL, Sawyers JL. Transabdominal proctopexy (Ripstein procedure) for massive rectal prolapse. Am Surg 1977;43:97–100.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Goldberg SM, Gordon PH. Treatment of rectal prolapse. Clin Gastroenterol 1975;4:489–504.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gordon PH, Hoexter B. Complications of the Ripstein procedure. Dis Colon Rectum 1978;21:277–80.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Jurgeleit HC, Corman ML, Coller JA, Veidenheimer MC. Procidentia of the rectum: teflon sling repair of rectal prolapse, Lahey Clinic experience (symposium). Dis Colon Rectum 1975;18:464–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kirkman NF. Procidentia of the rectum: results of abdominal rectopexy in the elderly (symposium). Dis Colon Rectum 1975;18:470–2.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Nigro ND. Procidentia of the rectum. Surg Clin North Am 1978;58:539–54.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ripstein CB. Procidentia: definitive corrective surgery (symposium). Dis Colon Rectum 1972;15:334–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Romero-Torres R. Sacrofixation with marlex mesh in massive prolapse of the rectum. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1979;149:709–11.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sawyers JL. Experience with the Ripstein procedure for massive rectal prolapse. South Med J 1970;63:639–41.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Swinton NW Sr. Management of patients with complete rectal prolapse or procidentia. Surg Clin North Am 1971;51:825–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Morgan B. Procidentia of the rectum: the Ripstein operation (symposium). Dis Colon Rectum 1975;18:468–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Read at the meeting of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Colorado Springs, Colorado, June 7 to 11, 1981.

About this article

Cite this article

Launer, D.P., Fazio, V.W., Weakley, F.L. et al. The Ripstein procedure: A 16-year experience. Dis Colon Rectum 25, 41–45 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02553547

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02553547

Key words

Navigation