Skip to main content
Log in

A methodology study to evaluate quality of soybeans stored at different moisture levels

  • Technical
  • Published:
Journal of the American Oil Chemists’ Society

An Erratum to this article was published on 01 October 1987

Abstract

The quality of soybeans and oil extracted from seeds stored at different moisture contents was evaluated by static headspace gas chromatography, near-infrared spectrometry, fluorescence measurements, and silicic acid chromatography. Headspace gas chromatographic analysis of both ground beans and crude oils provided a sensitive measure of oxidative deterioration based on hexanal and total volatiles. Near-infrared analyses at 2260 nm showed a correlation coefficient of 0.864 with titratable free fatty acids. Fluorescence measurements on chloroform-methanol extracts were much less sensitive and showed an increase only in the most damaged samples. Silicic acid chromatography of crude oils showed a significant decrease of polar lipids and increase of less polar lipids with storage at high moisture levels, in agreement with the decrease in phosphorus observed. Among the methods tested, headspace gas chromatography is most sensitive to evaluate oxidative deterioration, and near-infrared analysis is most suitable and rapid to evaluate hydrolytic deterioration in stored soybeans. This methodology can be used to evaluate factors affecting the food quality of soybeans for domestic and foreign markets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Krober, O.A., and F.I. Collins,J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 25:296 (1948).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Robertson, J.A., W.H. Morrison III and D. Burdick, Ibid.:443 (1973).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Evans, C.D., G.R. List, R.E. Beal and L.T. Black, Ibid.:444 (1974).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. List, G.R., C.D. Evans, K. Warner, R.E. Beal, W.F. Kwolek, L.T. Black and K.J. Moulton, Ibid.:8 (1977).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Chapman, G.W. Jr., and J.A. Robertson, Ibid.:195 (1977).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mounts, T.L., G.R. List and A.J. Heakin, Ibid.:883 (1979).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Chapman, G.W. Jr., and J.A. Robertson, Ibid.:339 (1980).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Nash, A.M., and E.N. Frankel, Ibid.:244 (1986).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Snyder, J.M., E.N. Frankel and E. Selke, Ibid.:1675 (1985).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Reiss, U., and A.L. Tappel,Lipids 8:199 (1973).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Official and Tentative Methods of the American Oil Chemists’ Society, 3rd edition, edited by R.O. Walker, AOCS, Champaign, IL (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nash, A.M., E.N. Frankel and W.F. Kwolek,J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 61:921 (1984).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hvolby, A., Ibid.:503 (1971).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Forss, D.A.,Prog. Chem. Fats Other Lipids 13:181 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Frankel, E.N.,Prog. Lipid Res. 22:133 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tappel, A.L., inFree Radicals in Biology, edited by W.A. Pryor, Academic Press, New York, 1980, pp. 1–47.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bidlack, W.R., and A.L. Tappel,Lipids 8:203 (1973).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02636996.

About this article

Cite this article

Frankel, E.N., Nash, A.M. & Snyder, J.M. A methodology study to evaluate quality of soybeans stored at different moisture levels. J Am Oil Chem Soc 64, 987–992 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02542434

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02542434

Keywords

Navigation