Skip to main content
Log in

Quality control in fruit processing

  • Technical
  • Published:
Journal of the American Oil Chemists’ Society

Abstract

The attainment of high-quality palm products at minimum cost demands that more emphasis be placed on the production side, i.e., the effort must be concentrated at the field and mill level. All field and mill personnel must be involved in quality control and must be responsible for the quality requirements.

A long-range effort at developing employee responsibility and job enlargement is required. For this to have a real chance of success, the following should be present:

  • Top management’s commitment: The estate manager and the mill manager are the key to assuming responsibility for quality. Estate and mill managers must be openly and actively committed to improving quality.

  • Quality policy: Estate and mill managers must decide what level of quality they can deliver to the marketplace, as well as how they expect to accomplish their goals.

  • Quality responsibility: Estate and mill organizations should be structured to utilize quality improvement efforts through quality control circles (QCC).

  • Quality supervision: Field supervisors, mill foreman and mill supervisors should be trained in human relations and quality control methods.

  • Quality consultation: Quality control department should be well run to assist field and mill personnel in establishing good quality practices and procedures.

  • Quality training: QCC should be provided with in-house training on basic statistical tools and cause/effect diagrams.

  • Quality incentives: Compensation of workers and QCC should be linked to reduction of product losses, reduced downtime, etc.

  • Quality recognition: Public recognition should be provided for groups and individuals responsible for quality improvements and suggestions.

  • Quality feedback: A well-organized system should exist to disseminate information and improve quality improvement. Continuous informal and formal interaction should occur between design and mill personnel, thereby stimulating quality improvement in the milling stage.

The activities needed to achieve high-quality palm products are scattered among many persons in many specialized departments. Some of these are in-house, while others may be a part of vendor companies, subsidiaries, etc.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lim, K.H., Palm Oil Mill Quality Control Laboratories, PORIM Workshop on Quality in the Palm Oil Industry, Kuala Lumpur, 2–3 August, 1983.

  2. Jacobsberg, B., The Influence of Milling and Storage Condition on the Bleachability and keepability of Palm Oil, ISP Conference on Quality & Marketing of Oil Palm Products, 1969.

  3. Olie, J.J., Some Factors Influencing the Bleachability of Palm Oil, Ibid.

  4. Thieme, W.L. and J.J. Olie, Discolouration of Oil Palm Kernels in Relation to Processing Temperature and Time, Ibid.

  5. Southworth, A., Harvesting, in Oil Palm Research, edited by R.H.V. Corley, J.J. Hardon, & B.J. Wood, Amsterdam: Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, 1976, pp. 469–477.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gray, B.S. and J.W.L. Bevan, Field Factors Affecting the Quality of Palm Oil. ISP Conference on Quality & Marketing of Oil Palm Products, 1969.

  7. Ng, K.T. and A. Southworth, Optimum Time of Harvesting Oil Palm Fruit, in Advances in Oil Palm Cultivation, edited by R.L. Wastie & D.A. Earp, Kuala, Lumpur, Incorporated Society of Planters, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Southworth, A., Field Factors Affecting Quality, The Planter, pp. 440–451, 1979.

  9. Wood, B.J., et al. A Preliminary Report on a Long-Term Study of the Effect of Oil Palm Harvesting, Strategy on Product Recovery, Including a Comparison Before and After Weevil Pollination, Symposium on Impact of the Pollinating Weevil on the Malaysian Oil Palm Industry, Kuala Lumpur, 1984.

  10. Clegg, A.J., An Analysis of Damage Incurred by Oil Palm Bunches During Handling and Transport, in Advances in Oil Palm Cultivation, edited by R.L. Wastie & D.A. Earp, Kuala Lumpur, Incorporated Society of Planters, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bek-Nielsen, B., Factors Responsible for the Development of Peroxides During Production and Handling of Palm Oil, ISP Conference on Quality & Marketing of Oil Palm Products, 1969.

  12. Jacobsberg, B., Quality of Palm Oil, PORIM Occasional Paper No. 10, Palm Oil Research Institute of Malaysia, 1983.

  13. Bek-Nielsen, B., Palm Oil and Kernel Extraction Plants in Relation to Quality, ISP Conference on Quality & Marketing of Oil Palm Products, 1969.

  14. Chan, K.S., IKM Conference on Chemical Research, Kuala Lumpur, 1979.

  15. Chong, C.L., and Ab. Gapor Mohd Top, Effects of Moisture and Trace Metals on Oil Quality, PORIM Workshop on Quality in the Palm Oil Industry, Kuala Lumpur, 1983.

  16. Mongana Report, Research on Production and Storage of Palm Oil, Congo Palm, 1952–1955.

  17. Bek-Nielsen, B., Quality Aspects of Oil Palm Kernel Production, ISP Conference on the Quality and Marketing of Oil Palm Products, 1969.

  18. Lim, K.H., D.A.M. Whiting, & C.S. Chia, Magnetic Traps for Removal of Iron in Crude Palm Oil from an Estate Factory, International Conference on Palm Oil Product Technology in the Eighties, Kuala Lumpur, 1981.

  19. Juran, J.M., Quality Control Handbook, 3d edition, New York, McGraw-Hill.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Eng, T.G., Tat, M.M. Quality control in fruit processing. J Am Oil Chem Soc 62, 274–282 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02541391

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02541391

Keywords

Navigation