Skip to main content
Log in

Determination of ethylene oxide oligomer distributions in alcohol ethoxylates by HPLC using a rotating disc-flame ionization detector

  • Technical
  • Published:
Journal of the American Oil Chemists’ Society

Abstract

A high performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) method has been developed for the quantitative determination of ethylene oxide (EO) oligomer distributions (% wt) in acetylated alcohol ethoxylates, R(OCH2CH2)nOH, from n=0, 1 to n=30 using a rotating disc-flame ionization detector. Both single carbon number and mixed carbon number alcohol-based (NEODOL® ethoxylates) samples have been analyzed by gradient elution with 2 different solvent systems on a Waters μ-Porasil column. With both solvent systems, 95% hexane is the initial solvent but with one system, 100% acetone is the final solvent and with the other, 10% methanol/90% acetone is used. The latter solvent elutes the higher ethoxylates from n=21 to n=30 quantitatively from the μ-Porasil column which the 100% acetone solvent fails to do. The 100% acetone solvent separates n=2 and n=3 from n=0,1 which the methanol-containing solvent does not do. Response factors for n=3 and n=8 have been experimentally determined and the response factors for the other EO units have been calculated from these 2 results. The corrected EO oligomer distributions for both NEODOL® 25-9 and NEODOL® 23-6.5 determined by HPLC are in good agreement with those determined earlier by circular thin layer chromatography (up to n=16 can be determined by this method). The average EO numbers determined by the HPLC method and by a wet chemical (phthalic anhydride) method are in excellent agreement for the above 2 samples and a sample of NEODOL® 23-7.5. The results are discussed in terms of Snyder’s theory for gradient elution in HPLC using the gradient steepness parameter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Glidenberg, L., and J.R. Trowbridge, JAOCS 42:69 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Tornquist, J., Acta Chem. Scand. 20:572 (1966).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. McCoy, R.N., and A.B. Bullock, JAOCS 46:289 (1969).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Allen, M.C., and D.E. Linder, JAOCS, in press (presented at the ISF/AOCS World Congress in New York City, April 27–May 1, 1980).

  5. Nakamura, K., and I. Matsumoto, J. Chem. Soc. Japan 8:1342 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Szakasits, J.J., and R.E. Robinson, Anal. Chem. 46:1648 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Shell Method Series 561.

  8. Snyder, L.R., J.W. Dolan and J.R. Gant, J. Chromatogr. 165:3 (1979).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Dolan, J.W., J.R. Gant and L.R. Snyder, J. Chromatogr. 165:31 (1979).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Snyder, L.R., in High Performance Liquid Chromatography, edited by C. Horwath, Academic Press, New York, NY, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

McClure, J.D. Determination of ethylene oxide oligomer distributions in alcohol ethoxylates by HPLC using a rotating disc-flame ionization detector. J Am Oil Chem Soc 59, 364–373 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02541021

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02541021

Keywords

Navigation