Abstract
A human factors experiment was conducted to assess the intelligibility of synthesized speech under a variety of noise conditions for both hearing-impaired and normal-hearing subjects. Modified Rhyme Test stimuli were used to determine intelligibility in four speech-to-noise (S/N) ratios (0, 5, 10, and 15 dB), and three noise types, consisting of fiat-by-octaves (pink) noise, interior noise of a currently produced heavy truck, and truck cab noise with added background speech. A quiet condition was also investigated. During recording of the truck noise for the experiment, in-cab noise measurements were obtained. According to OSHA standards, these data indicated that drivers of the sampled trucks have a minimal risk for noise-induced hearing loss due to in-cab noise exposure when driving at freeway speeds because noise levels were below 80 dBA. In the intelligibility experiment, subjects with hearing loss had significantly lower intelligibility than normal-hearing subjects, both in quiet and in noise, but no interaction with noise type or S/N ratio was found. Intelligibility was significantly lower for the noise with background speech than the other noises, but the truck noise produced intelligibility equal to the pink noise. An analytical prediction of intelligibility using Articulation Index calculations exhibited a high positive correlation with the empirically obtained intelligibility data for both groups of subjects.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abel, S.M., Alberti, P.W., Haythoruthwaite, C., and Riko, K. (1982). Speech intelligibility in noise with and without hearing protectors. In P.W. Alberti (Ed.),Personal Hearing Protection in Industry. New York: Raven, pp. 371–385.
Acton, W.I. (1970). Speech intelligibility in a background noise and noise-induced hearing loss.Ergonomics, 13(5): 546–554.
ANSI S3.19-1974 (1974).Method for the Measurement of Real-Ear Protection of Hearing Protectors and Physical Attenuation of Earmuffs. New York: American National Standards Institute.
ANSI S3.5-1969 r 1986 (1986).Method for Calculation of the Articulation Index. New York: American National Standards Institute.
ANSI S3.2-1989 (1989).Method for Measuring the Intelligibility of Speech over Communication Systems. New York: American National Standards Institute.
ANSI S3.6-1989 (1989).Specification for Audiometers. New York: American National Standards Institute.
Clarke, R.M. (1978). Stationary locomotive in-cab noise measurements.Sound and Vibration, 12(5): 18–23.
Erlichman, J. (1992). A pilot study of the In-Vehicle Safety Advisory and Warning System (IVSAWS) driver-alert warning system design. InProceedings of the Human Factors Society 36th Annual Meeting. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society, pp. 480–484.
Fleischman, R.N., Carpenter, J.T., Dingus, T.A., Szezublewski, F.E., Krage, M.K., and Means, L.G. (1991). Human factors in the TravTek demonstration IVHS project: Getting information to the driver. InProceedings of the Human Factors Society 35th Annual Meeting. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society, pp. 1115–1119.
Green, P., Williams, M., Serafin, C., and Paelke, G. (1991). Human factors research on future automotive instrumentation: A progress report. InProceedings of the Human Factors Society 35th Annual Meeting. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society, pp. 1120–1124.
Hawkins, J.E. and Stevens, S.S. (1950). The masking of pure tones and of speech by white noise.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 22(1): 6–13.
Intelligent Vehicle Highway Society of America (1992). Strategic plan for intelligent vehicle-highway systems in the United States. Washington, DC: Author.
Kangas, K.A. and Allen, G.D. (1990). Intelligibility of synthetic speech for normal-hearing and heating-impaired listeners.Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 55: 751–755.
Leneman, G. (1977). Truck noise 9: Noise reduction study of an inservice diesel-powered truck (Report No. DOT-TSC-OST-76-3). Washington, DC: Department of Transportation.
Logan, J.S., Greene, B.G., and Pisoni, D.B. (1989). Segmental intelligibility of synthetic speech produced by rule.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 86(2): 566–581.
Mast, T. (1991). Human factors in intelligent vehicle-highway systems: A look at the future. InProceedings of the Human Factors Society 35th Annual Meeting. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society, pp. 1125–1129.
Mast, T.M. and Peters, J.I. (1992). Intelligent Vehicle Highway Systems (IVHS): Human factors issues in subsystem development. InProceedings of the Human Factors Society 36th Annual Meeting. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society, p. 1063.
Mirenda, P. and Beukelman, D.R. (1987). A comparison of speech synthesis intelligibility with listeners from three age groups.Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 3: 120–128.
Morrison, H.B. (1993). Intelligibility of synthesized voice messages in commercial truck cab noise for normal-heating and hearing-impaired listeners. Unpublished master's thesis. Blacksbnrg, VA: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
Nerbonne, M.A. and Accardi, A.E. (1975). Noise-induced hearing loss in a truck driver population.The Journal of Auditory Research, 15: 119–122.
OSHA (1989). Occupational noise exposure. InCode of Federal Regulations, 29 Part 1910.95. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, pp. 177–194.
Pekkarinen, E., Salmivalli, A., and Suonää, J. (1990). Effect of noise on word discrimination by subjects with impaired hearing, compared with those of normal hearing.Scandinavian Audiology, 19: 31–36.
Pisoni, D.B. and Koen, E. (1982). Intelligibility of natural and synthetic speech at several different signal-to-noise ratios.Journal qf the Acoustical Society of America, 71, UUI.
Pollack, I. and Pickett, J.M. (1958). Masking of speech by noise at high sound levels.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 30(2): 127–130.
Pratt, R.L. (1987). Quantifying the performance of text-to-speech synthesizers.Speech Technology, 5: 54–63.
Reif, Z.F. and Moore, T.N. (1983). Prediction of in-cab noise exposure of drivers (Technical Paper 831028). Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers.
Reif, Z.F., Moore, T.N., and Steevensz, A.E. (1980). Noise exposure of truck drivers (Technical Paper 800278). Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers.
Schwab, E.C., Nusbaum, H.C., and Pisoni, D.B. (1985). Some effects of training on the perception of synthetic speech.Human Factors, 27(4): 395–408.
Smoorenburg, G.F., de Laat, J.A.P.M., and Plomp, R. (1982). The effect of noise-induced hearing loss on the intelligibility of speech in noise. In H.M. Borchgrevink (Ed.), Hearing and Hearing Prophylaxis (Scandinavian Audiology, Supplement 16), pp. 123–133.
Society of Automotive Engineers (1988). Sound level for truck cab interior (Report No. SAE J336). New York: Society of Automotive Engineers.
Vasey, M.W. and Thayer, J.F. (1987). The continuing problem of false positives in repeated measures ANOVA in psychophysiology: A multivariate solution.Psychophysiology, 24(4): 479–486.
Werner, V.A. and Boyce, W. (1976). Truck noise 11: Evaluation and reduction of heavy-duty truck noise (Report No. DOT-TSC-OST-76-21). Washington, DC: Department of Transportation.
Willis, D.K. (1990). IVHS technologies: Promising palliatives or popular poppycock?Transportation Quarterly, 44(1): 73–84.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Morrison, H.B., Casali, J.G. Intelligibility of synthesized voice messages in commercial truck cab noise for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. Int J Speech Technol 2, 33–44 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02539821
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02539821