Skip to main content
Log in

Cultural reactions of rhizobia with special reference to strains isolated fromSesbania species

  • Published:
Antonie van Leeuwenhoek Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

  1. 1.

    All the sesbania strains employed in these studies were strikingly similar to other well-known rhizobia as shown by a wide variety of tests involving a diverse collection of mineral salts media containing a variety of carbon and nitrogen sources.

  2. 2.

    In comparative tests the 39 strains of sesbania rhizobia are divided into two well-defined groups. Those fromS. macrocarpa andS. longifolia, designated as Group 1, were culturally similar to the fast-growing rhizobia from clover, peas and beans. These strains produced mucilaginous colonies on all agar media, did not grow inHofer's alkaline media, veal infusion broth,Clark andLub's, Koser's uric acid andZoBell's media and did not reduce nitrate. Others fromS. grandiflora, S. tomentosa, S. aculeata andS. sesban, comprising Group 2, produced compact opaque colonies, grew in the above media and reduced nitrate slowly.

  3. 3.

    Question is raised that Congo red agar is a completely reliable medium for the separation of rhizobia from closely allied bacteria, as judged by dye absorption.

  4. 4.

    The strains of sesbania rhizobia showed considerable variation in their abilities to tolerate crystal violet in a peptone-sucrose medium. The majority of fast-growing strains of the designated rhizobial species did not grow in concentrations greater than 1∶10,000 crystal violet; none of the slow-growing strains tolerated concentrations above 1∶30,000. All the strains of species in the genusAgrobacterium resisted a 1∶2,500 concentration.

  5. 5.

    Evidence is presented that a relationship exists between tolerance of rhizobial strains to crystal violet dye in media and their abilities to produce gum.

  6. 6.

    Various cultural tests are described which permit reliable differentiations between rhizobia and related bacteria, exemplified by diverse strains ofA. tumefacines andA. radiobacter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature

  1. W. A. Albrecht andT. M. McCalla, J. Bact.34, 455, 1937.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ethel K. Allen andO. N. Allen, Bact. Rev.14, 273, 1950.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. O. N. Allen, Experiments in Soil Bacteriology, Burgess Publishing Co., Minneapolis, Minn., U.S.A., 126 pp., 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  4. C. S. Bryan, Soil Sci.45, 185, 1938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. M. Damodaran andM. Srinivasan, Proc. Indian Acad. Sci.2B, 337, 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  6. C. E. Georgi andJane M. Ettinger, J. Bact.41, 323, 1941.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. J. O. Harris, Unpublished Master of Science thesis, 86 pp., University of Hawaii, Honolulu, T. H.,1941.

  8. A. W. Hofer, J. Bact.25, 56, 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. W. Hofer, J. Amer. Soc. Agron.27, 228, 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. W. Hofer, J. Bact.41, 193, 1941.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. E. W. Hopkins, W. H. Peterson andE. B. Fred, J. Amer. Chem. Soc.52, 3659, 1930.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. S. A. Koser, J. Infect. Dis.23, 377, 1918.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. T. Matsuoka, Japanese patent 35952, March 11, 1920 (see Chem. Abs.15, No. 1406, 1921).

  14. T. Rajagopalan, Indian J. Agr. Sci.8, 331, 1938.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. M. S. Raju, Zentr. Bakt. II,94, 337, 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  16. A. J. Riker, W. M. Banfield, W. H. Wright, G. W. Keitt andH. E. Sagen, J. Agr. Res.41, 507, 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  17. A. J. Riker, Mary M. Lyneis andS. B. Loche, Phytopath.31, 964, 1941.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. N. R. Smith, J. Bact.15, 20, 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  19. N. R. Smith andH. Humfeld, J. Agr. Res.41, 97, 1930.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. C. E. ZoBell andCatherine B. Feltham, J. Bact.28, 169, 1934.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Published with the approval of the director, Wisconsin Agricultural Experiment Station.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Johnson, M.D., Allen, O.N. Cultural reactions of rhizobia with special reference to strains isolated fromSesbania species. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 18, 1–12 (1952). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02538585

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02538585

Keywords

Navigation