Skip to main content
Log in

A comparison of the oleaginous yeast,Candida curvata, grown on different carbon sources in continuous and batch culture

  • Published:
Lipids

Abstract

The oleaginous yeast,Candida curvata D, was grown in both batch and continuous culture on 5 different carbon sources to compare the efficiency of fat production from the various substrates. Maximum lipid accumulation occurred in batch culture with xylose as the carbon source on nitrogenlimited medium reaching a level of 49% (w/w) of the biomass, but this was reduced to 37% at the optimum dilution rate (D=0.05/hr) in a chemostat. Both the highest biomass and lipid yields were attained in continuous culture with lactose as the sole carbon source at a dilution rate of D=0.04/hr, giving an efficiency of substrate conversion of 60 g of biomass and 18.6 g lipid per 100 g lactose utilized. The relative proportions of the major fatty acids (16∶0, 18∶0, 18∶1, 18∶2) in the lipid were found to vary considerably in batch culture and in continuous culture under carbon-limited conditions. However, on nitrogen-limited media in the chemostat, the fatty acid composition remained relatively constant over the whole range of dilution rates employed. Lipid from xylose-grown cells contained the greatest percentage of stearic acid (18∶0) 15% and the lowest linoleic acid (18∶2) 4%, whereas lipid from ethanol-grown cells contained elevated levels of oleic acid (18∶1) 51% and decreased palmitic acid (16∶0) 25%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Moon, N.J., Hammond, E.G., and Glatz, B.A. (1978) J. Dairy. Sci. 61, 1537–1543.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Woodbine, M. (1959) Prog. Indust. Microbiol. 1, 179–245.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ratledge, C. (1982) Prog. Indust. Microbiol. 16, 119–206.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Moon, N.J., and Hammond, E.G. (1978) J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 55, 683–688.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Tempest, D.W., and Wouters, J.T.M. (1981) Enzyme Microbial Technol. 3, 283–290.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gill, C.O., Hall, M.J., and Ratledge, C. (1977) Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 33, 231–239.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hall, M.J., and Ratledge, C. (1977) Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 33, 577–584.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ratledge, C., and Hall, M.J. (1979) Biotechnol. Lett. 1, 115–120.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Boulton, C.A., and Ratledge, C. (1981) J. Gen. Microbiol. 127, 169–176.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Chaney, A.L., and Marbach, E.G. (1962) Clin. Chem. 8, 130–132.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Herbert, D., Phipps, P.J., and Strange, R.E. (1972) in Methods in Microbiology (Norris, J.R., and Ribbons, D.W., eds.) Vol. 5B, pp. 0210-344, Academic Press, London and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Folch, J., Lees, M., and Sloane-Stanley, G.H. (1957) J. Biol. Chem. 226, 497–509.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Marientti, G.V. (1962) J. Lipid Res. 3, 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kessell, R.H.J. (1968) J. Appl. Bacteriol. 31, 220–231.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kates, M., and Baxter, R.M. (1963) Can. J. Biochem. Physiol. 40, 1213–1227.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hammond, E. G., Glatz, B.A., Choi, Y., and Teasdale, M.T. (1981) in New Sources of Fats and Oils (Pryde, E.H., Princen, L.H., and Mukherjee, K.D., eds.) Am. Oil Chem. Soc., Monograph no. 9, pp. 171–187.

  17. Lee, Y.Y., Lin, C.M., Johnson, T., and Chambers, R.P. (1979) Biotechnol. Bioeng. Symp. 8, 75–83.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Botham, P.A., and Ratledge, C. (1979) J. Gen. Microbiol. 114, 361–375.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Krumphanzl, V., Gregr, J.V., Pelechova, J., and Uher, J. (1973) Biotech. Bioeng. Symp. 4, 245–256.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Evans, C.T., Ratledge, C. A comparison of the oleaginous yeast,Candida curvata, grown on different carbon sources in continuous and batch culture. Lipids 18, 623–629 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02534673

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02534673

Keywords

Navigation