Skip to main content
Log in

A comparison of simplified methods for lipoprotein quantification using the analytic ultracentrifuge as a standard

  • Published:
Lipids

Abstract

Two simplified methods for quantitative lipoprotein analysis have been calibrated and compared with each other using analytic ultracentrifugation as a standard reference procedure. The first method was the Friedewald procedure and the second was an automated agarose gel electrophoresis system. Both procedures offer comparable quantitative lipoprotein analysis with potential for large scale screening purposes at low cost ($4.00–$5.00 per analysis). There were advantages and limitations to both procedures. The Friedwald procedure can be used on frozen sera but requires 3 ml sera. In contrast, the electrophoresis system must be used with fresh serum but requires only 50 μl serum and the electrophoretic slides may be quantitatively analyzed several years retrospectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fredrickson, D.S., R.I. Levy, and F.T. Lindgren, J. Clin. Invest. 47:2446 (1968).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Miller, G.J., and N.E. Miller, Lancet 1:16 (1975).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Manual of Laboratory Operations, Lipid Research Clinic Program, Vol. 1, Lipid and Lipoprotein Analysis, DHEW Pub. No. (NIH) pp. 75–628, Washington, DC, U.S. Government Printing Office, 1974.

  4. Friedewald, W.T., R.I. Levy, and D.S. Fredrickson, Clin. Chem. 18:499 (1972).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wong, R.A., P.G. Banchero, L.C. Jensen, S.S. Pan, G.L. Adamson, and F.T. Lindgren, J. Lab. Clin. Med. (in press, 1977).

  6. The Walnut Creek Contraceptive Drug Study. A Prospective Study of the Side Effects of Oral Contraceptives, Edited by S. Ramcharan, Vol. 1, DHEW Pub. No. (NIH) pp. 75–628, Washington, DC, U.S. Government Printing Office, 1974.

  7. Lindgren, F.T., G.L. Adamson, L.C. Jensen, and P.D. Wood, Lipids 10:750 (1975).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Stern, M.P., B.W. Brown, W.L. Haskell, J.W. Farquhar, C.L. Wehrle, and P.S. Wood, J. Am. Med. Assoc. 235:811 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Auto Analyzer II-24, May, 1971, Simultaneous Cholesterol/Triglycerides, Techicon Instruments Corp., Tarrytown, NY 10591.

  10. Hatch, F.T., F.T. Lindgren, G.L. Adamson, L.C. Jensen, A.W. Wong, and R.I. Levy, J. Lab. Clin. Med. 81:946 (1973).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lindgren, F.T., L.C. Jensen, and F.T. Hatch, in “Blood Lipids and Lipoproteins,” Edited by G.J. Nelson, John Wiley-Interscience, New York, NY, 1972, pp. 181–274.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Samson, E.J., D.D. Derek, and L.M. Demers, Clin. Chem. 22:346 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Lindgren, F.T., Silvers, A., Jutagir, R. et al. A comparison of simplified methods for lipoprotein quantification using the analytic ultracentrifuge as a standard. Lipids 12, 278–282 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02533347

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02533347

Keywords

Navigation