Skip to main content
Log in

Highly sensitive analytical method for aluminum movement in soybean root through lumogallion staining

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Plant Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We present highly sensitive aluminum detection method in root using fluorescent lumogallion. Roots treated with 100 μM AlCl3 including 0.2 mM CaCl2 (pH 4.5) were stained for 60 min with 10 μM lumogallion fluorescence solution and fluorescence from aluminum complex in root was observed under confocal laser microscope. There was a good correlation between the intensity of fluorescence and aluminum content. When the amount of aluminum lost during each step in staining process was measured, it was found that about 10% of aluminum was lost only at staining stage. Through lumogallion staining method, aluminum accumulation especially at an early stage of aluminum treatment in root was shown. At the beginning (2 hr), aluminum began to be accumulated in root cap. After 4 hr treatment, the aluminum distribution was spread to about 3 mm from root apex in the root cap and outer cortex. When aluminum was found in the outer cortex in 3–5 mm from the root apex, the viability was tended to be decreased in the same area (6 hr). At the same time, aluminum amount in meristem was increased. However the comparison of lumogallion staining method with that of morin, which has been widely used to detect aluminum in root, the sensitivity of lumogallion method was found to be much higher.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akama, Y. andTong, A. 1993. High-performance liquid chromatographic determination of aluminium and iron (III) in solar salt in the form of their 1-phenyl-3-methyl-4-benzoyl-5-pyrazolone chelates. J. Chromatogr.633: 129–133.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bond, A.M. andNagaosa, Y. 1985. Determination of aluminum, copper, iron and managanese in biological and other samples as 8-quinoliol complexes by high-performance liquid chromatography with electrochemical and spectrophosphotometric detection. Anal. Chem. Acta.178: 197–208.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Delhaize, D., Craig, S., Beaton, C.D., Bennet, R.J., Jagadish, V.C. andRandall, P.J. 1993. Aluminum tolerance in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant Physiol.103: 685–693.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Delhaize, D. andRyan, P.R. 1995. Aluminum toxicity and tolerance in plants. Plant Physiol.107: 315–321.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kaneko, E., Hoshino, H., Yotsuyanagi, T., Watabe, R. andSeki, T. 1992. Determination of aluminum in natural waters by ion-pair reversed-phase partition HPLC. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn.65: 3192–3194.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, P.B., Tin, C.Y., Kochian, L.V. andHowell, S.H. 1996. Arabidopsis mutants with increased sensitivity to aluminum. Plant Physiol.110: 743–751.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Magaly, R. andRobert, A.G. 1992. Aluminum partitioning in intact roots of aluminum-tolerant and aluminum-sensitive wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars. Plant Physiol.99: 1021–1028.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poll, E., Konzak, C.F. andKittrick, J.A. 1978. Visual detection of aluminum tolerance level in wheat by hematoxylin staining seedling roots. Crop Science18: 823–827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, P.R., Ditomaso, J.M. andKochian, L.V. 1993. Aluminium toxicity in roots: An investigation of spatial sensitivity and the role of the root cap. J. Exp. Bot.44: 437–446.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sarzanini, C., Sacchero, G., Aceto, M., Abollino, O. andMentasti, E. 1993. Ion-pair reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography for trace metal preconcentration followed by ion-interaction chromatography. J. Chromatogr.640: 127–134.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shuman, M.S. 1992. Dissociation pathways and species distribution of aluminum bound to an aquatic fuluvic acid. Environ. Sci. Technol.26: 593–598.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki, Y. 1989. Fluorimetric determination of aluminium in serum. Analyst114: 839–842.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tice, K.R., Parker, D.R. andDeMason, D.A. 1992. Operationally defined apoplastic and symplastic aluminum fraction in root tips of aluminum-intoxicated wheat. Plant Physiol.100: 309–318.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Uehara, N., Kanbayashi, M., Hoshino, H. andYotsuyanagi, T. 1989. An ion-pair reversed-phase HPLC-fluorimetric system for ultratrace determination of aluminium with salicylaldethydebenzoylhydrazone. Talanta36: 1031–1035.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, J., Zhou, C.Y., Chi, H., Wong, M.K., Lee, H.K., Ong, H.Y. andOng, C.N. 1995. Determination of serum aluminium using an ion-pair reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatographic-fluorimetric system with lumogallion. J. Chromatogr.663: 247–253.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kataoka, T., Mori, M., Nakanishi, T.M. et al. Highly sensitive analytical method for aluminum movement in soybean root through lumogallion staining. J. Plant Res. 110, 305–309 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02524927

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02524927

Key words

Navigation