Skip to main content
Log in

Selection of smoothing parameters inB-spline nonparametric regression models using information criteria

  • Model Selection
  • Published:
Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We consider the use ofB-spline nonparametric regression models estimated by the maximum penalized likelihood method for extracting information from data with complex nonlinear structure. Crucial points inB-spline smoothing are the choices of a smoothing parameter and the number of basis functions, for which several selectors have been proposed based on cross-validation and Akaike information criterion known as AIC. It might be however noticed that AIC is a criterion for evaluating models estimated by the maximum likelihood method, and it was derived under the assumption that the ture distribution belongs to the specified parametric model. In this paper we derive information criteria for evaluatingB-spline nonparametric regression models estimated by the maximum penalized likelihood method in the context of generalized linear models under model misspecification. We use Monte Carlo experiments and real data examples to examine the properties of our criteria including various selectors proposed previously.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akaike, H. (1973). Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle,2nd International Symposium on Information Theory (eds. B. N. Petrov and F. Csaki), 267–281, Akademiai Kiado, Budapest (Reproduced inBreakthroughs in Statistics, Volume 1 (eds. S. Kotz and N. L. Johnson), Springer Verlag, New York (1992)).

    Google Scholar 

  • Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification.IEEE Trans. Automat. Control,AC-19, 716–723.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Akaike, H. (1980a). On the use of predictive likelihood of a Gaussian model,Ann. Inst. Statist. Math.,32, 311–324.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Akaike, H. (1980b). Likelihood and the Bayes procedure,Bayesian Statistic (eds. J. M. Bernardo, M. H. DeGroot, D. V. Lindley and A. F. M. Smith), University Press, Valencia, Spain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bozdogan, H. (ed.) (1994).Proceedings of the First US/Japan Conference on the Frontiers of Statistical Modeling: An Informational Approach, Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craven, P. and Wahba, G. (1979). Smoothing noisy data with spline functions,Numer. Math.,31, 377–403.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • De Boor, C. (1978),A Practical Guide to Splines, Springer, Berlin.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dierckx, P. (1993).Curve and Surface Fitting with Splines, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Efron, B. (1979). Bootstrap methods: Another look at the jacknife,Ann. Statist.,7, 1–26.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Eilers, P. H. C. and Marx, B. D. (1996). Flexible smoothing withB-splines and penalties (with discussion),Statist. Sci.,11, 89–121.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Eubank, R. L. (1988)Spline Smoothing and Nonparametric Regression, Marcel Dekker, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Good, I. J. (1965).The Estimation of Probabilities, M. I. T. Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Good, I. J. and Gaskins, R. A. (1971). Nonparametric roughness penalties for probability densities,Biometrika,58, 255–277.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Green, P. J. (1987). Penalized likelihood for general semi-parametric regression models,International Statistical Review,55, 245–259.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Green, P. J. and Silverman, B. W. (1994).Nonparametric Regression and Generalized Linear Models, Chapman and Hall, London.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hampel, F. R., Rousseeuw, P. J., Ronchetti, E. M. and Stahel, W. A. (1986).Robust Statistics. The Approach on Influence, Wiley, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Härdle, W. (1990).Applied Nonparametric Regression, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hastie, T. and Tibshirani, R. (1990). Generalized Additive Models, Chapman and Hall, London.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hurvich, C. M. and Tsai, C.-L. (1989). Regression and time series model selection in small samples,Biometrika,76, 297–307.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hurvich, C. M., Simonoff, J. S. and Tsai, C.-L. (1998). Smoothing parameter selection in nonparametric regression using an improved Akaike information criterion,J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B,60, 271–293.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ishiguro, M. and Arahata, E. (1982). A Bayesian spline regression (in Japanese),Proc. Inst. Statist. Math.,30, 30–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishiguro, M., Sakamoto, Y. and Kitagawa, G. (1997). Bootstrapping log likelihood and EIC, an extension of AIC,Ann. Inst. Statist. Math.,49, 411–434.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kitagawa, G. and Gersch, W. (1996).Smoothness Priors Analysis of Time Series, Springer, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Konishi, S. (1999). Statistical model evaluation and information criteria.Multivariate Analysis, Design of Experiments and Surrey Sampling (ed. S. Ghosh), 369–399, Marcel Dekker, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konishi, S. and Kitagawa, G. (1996). Generalised information criteria in model selection,Biometrika,83, 875–890.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kullback, S. and Leibler, R. A. (1951). On information and sufficiency,Ann. Math. Statist.,22, 79–86.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • McCullagh, P. and Nelder, J. A. (1989).Generalized Linear Models, 2nd ed., Chapman and Hall, London.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Nelder, J. A. and Wedderburn, R. W. M. (1972). Generalized linear models.J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. A,135, 370–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, B. W. (1985). Some aspects of the spline smoothing approach to nonparametric regression curve fitting (with discussion),J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B,47, 1–52.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, B. W. (1986).Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis, Chapman and Hall, London.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Simonoff, J. S. (1996).Smoothing Methods in Statistics, Springer, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, C. J. (1974). Cross-validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions (with discussion),J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B,36, 111–147.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Sugiura, N. (1978). Further analysis of the data by Akaike's information criterion and finite corrections,Comm. Statist. Theory Methods,A7, 13–26.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Tanabe, K. and Tanaka, T. (1983). Fitting curves and surfaces to data by using Bayes model (in Japanese),Chikyu,5, 179–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahba, G. (1978). Improper priors, spline smoothing and the probrem of guarding against model errors in regression,J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B,40, 364–372.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Imoto, S., Konishi, S. Selection of smoothing parameters inB-spline nonparametric regression models using information criteria. Ann Inst Stat Math 55, 671–687 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02523388

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02523388

Key words and phrases

Navigation