Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluating mental health care reform: Including the clinician, client, and family perspective

  • Commentary
  • Published:
The journal of mental health administration Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article suggests one direction that theory building might take to develop a stronger conceptual foundation needed to test the effect on clients of reforms in the financing and organization of mental health care delivery systems. The authors recommend that health status outcomes be measured from three perspectives: the client, who can best report his or her own subjective experience of illness; the clinician, who is the best source of information about the client’s disease; and the family, which is the best source of information about the effects on members’ health status of caring for a mentally ill family member. The authors also recommend that measurement of health status should be multidimensional.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Judd LL: Untitled column.Focus on Mental Health Services Research 1988; 2:5.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Christiansen T, Pedersen KM, Harvald B, et al.: An investigation of the effect of regional variation in the treatment of hypertension.Social Science Medicine 1989; 28:131–139.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Loft A, Andersen TF, Madsen M: A quasi-experimental design based on regional variations: Discussion of a method for evaluating outcomes of medical practice.Social Science Medicine 1989; 28:147–154.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. McDermott W: Absence of indicators of the influence of its physicians on a society’s health: Impact of physician care on society.American Journal of Medicine 1981; 70:833–843.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wennberg JE, Freeman JL, Culp WJ: Are hospital services rationed in New Haven or over-utilized in Boston?Lancet 1987; 1:1185–1189.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wennberg JE, Gittelsohn A: Variations in medical care among small areas.Science American 1982; 246:120–134.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Frank RG, Lave JR: The impact of Medicaid benefit design on length of hospital stay and patient transfers.Hospital and Community Psychiatry 1985; 36:749–753.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Frank RG, Lave JR: A plan for prospective payment for inpatient psychiatric care.Hospital and Community Psychiatry 1985; 36:775–776.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Jencks SF, Goldman HH, McGuire TG: Challenges in bringing exempt psychiatric services under a prospective payment system.Hospital and Community Psychiatry 1985; 36:764–769.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. McGuire TG, Dickey B, Shively GE, et al.: Differences in resource use and cost among facilities treating alcohol, drug abuse, and mental disorders: Implications for design of a prospective payment system.American Journal of Psychiatry 1987; 144:616–620.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mitchell JB, Dickey B, Liptzin B, et al.: Bringing psychiatric patients into Medicare prospective payment system: Alternatives to DRGs.American Journal of Psychiatry 1987; 144:610–615.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Newhouse JP, Friedlander LJ: The relationship between medical resources and measures of health: Some additional evidence.The Journal of Human Resources 1979; 15:200–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tessler RC, Goldman HH:The Chronically Mentally Ill: Assessing Community Support Programs. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Frank RG, Goldman HH, McGuire TG: A model mental health benefit in private health insurance.Health Affairs 1992; 11:98–117.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bergner M: Quality of life, health status, and clinical research,Medical Care Supplement 1989; 27:148–156.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Breslow L: Health status measurement in the evaluating of health promotion.Medical Care Supplement 1989; 27:205–216.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Patrick DL, Deyo RA: Generic and disease specific measures in assessing health status and quality of life.Medical Care Supplement 1989; 27:217–232.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Stewart A, Ware JE Jr. (Eds.):Measuring Functioning and Well-Being. Durham and London: Duke University Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tarlov AR, Ware JE Jr., Greenfield S, et al.: The medical outcomes study. An application of methods for monitoring the results of medical care.Journal of the American Medical Association 1989; 262:925–930.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ware JE Jr., Brook RH, Davies-Avery A, et al.:Conceptualization and Measurement of Health for Adults in the Health Insurance Study, Vol. 1:Model of Health and Methodology. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  21. World Health Organization: Constitution. In:Basic documents. Geneva, Switzerland: Author, 1948.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Jahoda M:Current concepts of mental health, New York: Basic Books, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Eisenberg L, Kleinman A: Clinical social science. In: Eisenberg L, Kleinman A. (Eds.):The Relevance of Social Science to Medicine, Boston: Reidel, 1981, pp. 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Twaddle AC: Sickness and the sickness career: Some implications. In: Eisenberg L, Kleinman A (Eds.):The Relevance of Social Science to Medicine, Boston: Reidel, 1981, pp. 111–134.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Zola IK: Studying the decision to see a doctor: Review, critique, corrective.Advances in Psychosomatic Medicine 1972; 8:216–236.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Sherbourne CD, Stewart AL: The MOS social support survey.Social Science in Medicine 1991; 32:705–714.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Farmer S: Medical problems of chronic patients in a community support program,Hospital and Community Psychiatry 1987; 38:745–749.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Koran LM, Sox HC Jr., Marton KI, et al.: Medical evaluation of psychiatric patients. I Results in a state mental health system.Archives of General Psychiatry 1989; 46:733–40.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Ware JE Jr., Davies-Avery A, Donald CA:Conceptualization and Measurement of Health for Adults in the Health Insurance Study, Vol. 5:General Health Perceptions. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Connelly JE, Philbrich JT, Smith GR Jr., et al.: Health perceptions of primary care patients and the influence on health care utilization.Medical Care 1989; 27(3 Suppl):S9-S109.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Schlesinger M, Dorwart R: Ownership and mental-health services: A reappraisal of the shift toward privately owned facilities,New England Journal of Medicine 1984; 311:959–965.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Ware JE Jr.: Measures of a new era of health assessment. In: Stewart A, Ware JE Jr. (Eds.):Measuring Functioning and Well-Being. Durham and London: Duke University Press, 1992, pp. 3–24.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The work on which this article is based was supported by the Commonwealth Research Center at the Massachusetts Mental Health Center, Massachusetts Department of Mental Health.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dickey, B., Wagenaar, H. Evaluating mental health care reform: Including the clinician, client, and family perspective. The Journal of Mental Health Administration 21, 313–319 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02521337

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02521337

Keywords

Navigation