Skip to main content
Log in

Record linkage in a regional mental health planning study: Accuracy of unique identifiers, reliability of sociodemographics, and estimating identification error

  • Regular Articles
  • Published:
The journal of mental health administration Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Assembling information about individuals over time allows health managers and researchers to describe the progression of diseases, the care history of individuals and the sequences of care episodes that potentially result in improving individuals’ health status. However, current mental health statistics generally focus on sets of events rather than groups of individuals making it impossible to distinguish between two different persons being admitted and the same person being admitted twice. Accurate figures on treatment prevalence cannot be generated and multiservice users across time or across agencies will inflate the statistics used to plan needed services. The capacity to link consistently defined bits of information together is critical to developing a reliable information system. This article examines the adequacy of using unique identifier codes to accomplish linkage by focusing on one example of record linkage that incorporates mental health information from both community and institutional sectors in one region of Ontario, Canada. Findings indicate that unique “cradle to grave” identifiers do not guarantee accuracy if manual transcription is involved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Graham RE:Building Community Support for People: A Plan for Mental Health in Ontario, Toronto: Ministry of Health, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wasylenki D, Goering P, MacNaugton E: Planning mental health services: I. Background and key issues.Canadian Journal of Psychiatry 1992; 37:199–206.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. National Health Information Council:Health Information for Canada. Report of the National Task Force on Health Information. Presented to the Minister of Health, 1991; p. 9.

  4. Dunn HL: Record linkage.American Journal of Public Health 1946; 36:1412–1416.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Smith ME: Record linkage: Organizing the facts together. In: Bennett EM, Trute B (Eds.):Mental Health Systems: Problems and Prospects, New York: Edwin Mellen Press, 1983, pp. 263–281.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Trute B, Tefft B, Scuse D (Eds.):Human Service Information Systems: How to Design and Implement Them New York: Edwin Mellen Press, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ontario Mental Health Foundation:A Minimum Data Set Recommended for Collection by All Psychiatric Facilities in Ontario, 1987.

  8. Ministry of Health:Mental Health Act. Toronto: Queen’s Printer of Ontario, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Graham K, Brook RC: Analysis of an addictions treatment system,Evaluation and Program Planning 1985; 8:331–337.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Woogh CM: Patients with multiple admissions in a psychiatric record linkage system.Canadian Journal of Psychiatry 1990; 35:401–406.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ministry of Health:Putting People First: The Reform of Mental Health Services in Ontario. Toronto: Queen’s Printer of Ontario, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ellis RH, Wackwitz JH, Foster M: Uses of an empirically derived client typology based on level of functioning: Twelve years of the CCAR.Journal of Mental Health Administration 1991; 18(2):80–87.

    Google Scholar 

  13. American Psychiatric Association.Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (3rd ed., rev.). Washington, DC: Author, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Thunder Bay District and Kenora Rainy River District Health Councils:Regional Mental Health Study for Northwestern Ontario, 1992.

  15. Dalrymple A, Lahti L:Northwestern Ontario Mental Health Data Development Report. Presented to the Thunder Bay and Kenora-Rainy River District Health Councils, 1992.

  16. Hogan MF, Essock SM: Data and decisions: Can mental health management be knowledge-based?Journal of Mental Health Administration 1991; 18(1):12–20.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Parts of this research were supported by an Ontario Mental Health Foundation (OMHF) grant to the first author to study data linkage systems and by a Hospital Incentives Fund grant. The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the ministry of Health or the facility that sanctioned the research.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dalrymple, A.J., Lahti, L.S., Hutchinson, L.J. et al. Record linkage in a regional mental health planning study: Accuracy of unique identifiers, reliability of sociodemographics, and estimating identification error. The Journal of Mental Health Administration 21, 185–192 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02521325

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02521325

Keywords

Navigation