Skip to main content
Log in

The effect of earth orientation errors in baseline determination

  • Published:
Bulletin géodésique Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The determination of baseline lengths from certain space techniques is based on the derived coordinates of the terminal stations. As such, the estimated baselines are susceptible to systematic errors that affect the relative coordinates. One source of error is in the set of parameters which describes the continuously changing relative orientation of the Conventional Terrestrial (CTS) and Inertial (CIS) Reference frames. Due to these errors, the coordinates of each terminal station may in fact refer to a slightly different coordinate svstem, and, therefore, when used for computing the length between the stations, errors will result. The expected magnitudes of such errors and their possible presence in current solutions are investigated.

In conclusion, we find that the present level of accuracy and stability of the available parameters connecting the CTS and CIS (e.g., the ERP series) is unsatisfactory for centimeter level baseline length determinations. The available options are either the use of strictly simultaneous SLR data sets (similar to the VLBI data sets) or the improvement of the parameters connecting the CTS and the CIS. The first long-range step in the latter direction is the support of the IAG/IAU Joint Working Group COTES proposal [CSTG Bulletin, 1982], endorsed by both the IAG and IAU in various resolutions [IAU, 1983; IAG, 1982].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • D.C. CHRISTODOULIDIS and D.E. SMITH (1982): “SL5 Geodetic Solution,”Error Sources in SLR Baseline Determinations. NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center. Third Crustal Dynamics Working Group Meeting, Greenbelt, Maryland, October.

  • CSTG Bulletin (1982): “Reference Frame Requirements and the MERIT Campaign—Proposal for Extra Observations” June 9 (avail. Dept. of Geodetic Science and Surveying, Ohio State Univ., Columbus).

  • M. FEISSEL (1982): “Combined Estimates of the Earth Rotation Parameters—BIH Report,”Project MERIT, G.A. Wilkins and M. Feissel, eds., Royal Greenwich Observatory, Herstmonceaux, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • IAG (1982): “Resolutions Adopted by the General Meeting of the International Association of Geodesy, Tokyo, May 7–10,”Bulletin Géodésique, 56, 4, 396–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • IAU (1983): “The XVIIIth General Assembly of the International Astronomical Union, Patras, Greece, August, 1982, Resolution R5: The MERIT Campaign,”IAU Information Bulletin, 49, January, 1983, p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • I.I. MUELLER, B.S. RAJAL and Y.S. ZHU (1982): “Comparison of Polar Motion Data from the 1980 Project MERIT Short Campaign,”High Precision Earth Rotation and Earth-Moon Dynamics, Proc. of IAU Colloq. 63, Grasse, France, May, 1981, O. Calame, ed., Reidel.

  • E.C. PAVLIS (1983): “On the Geodetic Applications of Simultaneous Range-Differencing to Lageos,” Dept. of Geodetic Science and Surveying Rep. 338, Ohio State Univ., Columbus.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pavlis, E.C., Mueller, I.I. The effect of earth orientation errors in baseline determination. Bull. Geodesique 57, 273–282 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02520933

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02520933

Keywords

Navigation