Skip to main content
Log in

The reduction correction in North America

  • Published:
Bulletin Géodésique Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An inverse Poisson integral technique has been used to determine a gravity field on the geoid which, when continued by analytic free space methods to the topographic surface, agrees with the observed field. The computation is performed in three stages, each stage refining the previous solution using data at progressively increasing resolution (1o×1o, 5′×5′, 5/8′×5/8′) from a decreasing area of integration. Reduction corrections are computed at 5/8′×5/8′ granularity by differencing the geoidal and surface values, smoothed by low-pass filtering and sub-sampled at 5′ intervals. This paper discusses 1o×1o averages of the reduction corrections thus obtained for 172 1o×1o squares in western North America.

The 1o×1o mean reduction corrections are predominantly positive, varying from −3 to +15mgal, with values in excess of 5mgal for 26 squares. Their mean andrms values are +2.4 and 3.6mgal respectively and they correlate well with the mean terrain corrections as predicted byPellinen in 1962. The mean andrms contributions from the three stages of computation are: 1o×1o stage +0.15 and 0.7mgal; 5′×5′ stage +1.0 and 1.6mgal; and 5/8′×5/8′ stage +1.3 and 1.8mgal. These results reflect a tendency for the contributions to become larger and more systematically positive as the wavelengths involved become shorter. The results are discussed in terms of two mechanisms; the first is a tendency for the absolute values of both positive and negative anomalies to become larger when continued downwards and, the second, a non-linear rectification, due to the correlation between gravity anomaly and topographic height, which results in the values continued to a level surface being systematically more positive than those on the topography.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • A. BJERHAMMAR: On the boundary value problem of physical geodesy. Tellus, 21, pp. 451–516, 1969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. FORSBERG: A study of terrain reductions, density anomalies and geophysical inversion methods in gravity field modeling. Report #355, Department of Geodetic. Science and Surveying, Ohio State University, 1984.

  • R. FORSBERG and C.C. TSCHERNING: The use of height data in gravity field approximation by collocation. Jour. Geophys. Res., 86, pp. 7843–7854, 1981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • F.R. GANTMACHER:Applications of the theory of matrices. Interscience Publishers, Inc., New York, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.C. HARRISON and M. DICKINSON: Fourier transform methods in local gravity modeling, Bull. Géod., No. 63, pp. 149–166, 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • W.A. HEISKANEN and H. MORITZ:Physical Geodesy. Freeman and Co., San Francisco, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • M.S. MOLODENSKII, V.F. EREMEEV and M.I. YURKINA:Methods for the study of the external gravitational field of the earth. Translated from Russian (1960), Israel proram for scientific translations, Jerusalem, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • H. MORITZ: On the use of the terrain correction in solving Molodenskii's problem. Report #108, Department of Geodetic Science, Ohio State University, 1968.

  • H. MORITZ:Advanced physical geodesy. Herbert Wichman, Karlsruhe, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • R.L. PARKER: The rapid calculation of potential anomalies, Geophys. J.R. Astron. Soc., 31, pp. 447–455, 1972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • L.P. PELLINEN: Accounting for topography in the calculation of quasi-geoidal heights and plumb-line deflections from gravity anomalies. Bull. Géod., No. 63, pp. 57–65, 1962.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R.H. RAPP: The determination of high degree potential coefficient expansion from the combination of satellite and terrestrial gravity information. Report #361, Department of Geodetic Science, Ohio State University, 1984.

  • M.G. SIDERIS and K.P. SCHWARZ: Advances in the numerical solution of the linear Molodenskii problem. Bull. Géod., 62, pp. 59–69, 1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • I. STAKGOLD:Boundary value problems of mathematical physics. Volume 1 MacMillan Company, New York, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • R.S. VARGA:Matrix iterative analysis. Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Martzen, P.D., Harrison, J.C. The reduction correction in North America. Bull. Geodesique 63, 319–330 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02519631

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02519631

Keywords

Navigation