Summary
Larvae of genusPieris in the northern part of Kyoto City are parasitized by two tachinid flies:Epicampocera succincta, a specialist on genusPieris, andCompsilura concinnata, a generalist with very wide host-range. We surveyed the parasitism rates ofPieris by both flies for two years at six study areas. In these study areas, there lived three host species in the genusPieris: P. rapae, P. melete, andP. napi, but neither tachinid parasitizedP. napi to any significant extent. In the mountainous district,P. rapae andP. melete coexisted and their populations were relatively continuous, while in the lowland, onlyP. rapae larvae were abundant in spring and autumn, but even they disappeared in summer. Parasitisms byE. succincta occurred mainly in mountainous district and never in the lowland.C. concinnata parasitizedPieris in all the areas, but its parasitisms occurred mainly in autumn.
We analyzed the factors affecting the spatial and temporal patterns of parasitism rates and presumed that the temporal discontinuity of host population restricted the distribution of the specialist parasitoid.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bisset, G. A. (1938) Larvae and pupae of tachinids parasitizingPieris rapae L. andP. brassicae L.Parasitology30: 111–122.
Culver, J. J. (1919) A study ofCompsilura concinnata, an imported tachinid parasite of the gipsy moth and the brown-tail moth.U.S. Dep. Agric. Bull.766.
Morrison, G. andD. R. Strong, Jr. (1980) Spatial variations in host density and the intensity of parasitism: Some empirical examples.Environ. Entomol.9: 149–152.
Ohsaki, N. (1979) Comparative population studies of threePieris butterflies,P. rapae, P. melete andP. napi, living in the same area. I. Ecological requirements for habitat resources in the adults.Res. Popul. Ecol.20: 278–296.
Ohsaki, N. (1980) Comparative population studies of threePieris butterflies,P. rapae, P. melete andP. napi, living in the same area. II. Utilization of patchy habitats by adults through migratory and non-migratory movements.Res. Popul. Ecol.22: 163–183.
Ohsaki, N. (1982) Comparative population studies of threePieris butterflies,P. rapae, P. melete andP. napi, living in the same area. III. Difference in the annual generation numbers in relation to habitat selection by adults.Res. Popul. Ecol.24: 193–210.
Price, P. W. (1988) Inversely density-dependent parasitism: The role of plant refuges for hosts.J. Anim. Ecol.57: 89–96.
Sato, Y. (1976) Experimental studies on parasitization byApanteles glomeratus L. (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). I. Parasitization of different species of genusPieris.Appl. Ent. Zool.11: 165–175.
Sato, Y. andN. Ohsaki (1987) Host-habitat location byApanteles glomeratus and effect of food-plant exposure on host-parasitism.Ecol. Entomol.12: 291–297.
Smith, A. D. M. andD. A. Maelzer (1986) Aggregation of parasitoids and density-independence of parasitism in field populations of the waspAphytis melinus and its host, the red scaleAonidiella aurantii.Ecol. Entomol.11: 425–434.
Vinson, S. B. (1976) Host selection by insect parasitoids.Ann. Rev. Entomol.21: 109–133.
Weseloh, R. M. (1984) Effect of exposing adults of the gypsy moth parasiteCompsilura concinnala (Diptera: Tachinidae) to hosts on the parasite's subsequent behavior.Can. Ent.116: 79–84.
Yasumatsu, K. andC. Watanabe (1964)A tentative catalogue of insect natural enemies of injurious insects in Japan. Part 1. Parasite-Predator Host catalogue. Ent. Lab., Fac. of Agric., Kyushu Univ., Fukuoka. (in Japanese).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Iwao, K., Sato, Y. & Ohsaki, N. Spatio-temporal distribution patterns of two tachinid flies,Epicampocera succincta andCompsilura concinnata parasitizingPieris . Res Popul Ecol 31, 105–112 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02515808
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02515808