Skip to main content
Log in

Impact factors of purse seine net and dip net fisheries on a chub mackerel population

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Researches on Population Ecology

Abstract

There are two major kinds of fisheries for the chub mackerel in Japan. The purse seine net fishery exploits young and adult fish during the foraging season, while the dip net fishery exploits fish before and during the spawning season. To compare the damage to the chub mackerel stock caused by purse seine net and dip net fisheries, we introduced impact factors of the two kinds of fisheries on the two kinds of fisheries and estimated number of eggs spawned in 1982. We defined the impact factor as the ratio of the average reproductive value of individuals caught by each fishery to the reproductive value at maturity. The number of individuals caught by the purse seine net fishery was 66 times larger than the number caught by the dip net fishery, while the impact factor of the former was 84% of that of the latter. Thus, the total damage caused by the purse seine net fishery was much higher than the damage caused by the dip net fishery. We can evaluate the damage caused by mortality factors on endangered species using this method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Doi, T. (1973) A rapid method to estimate the optimum coefficient of fishing mortality ofChrysophrys major in the East China Sea and the Yellow Sea.Bull. Jpn. Soc. Sci. Fish. 39: 1–5. [in Japanese]

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R. A. (1930)The genetical theory of natural selection. Clarendon Press, Oxford (Reprinted 1958, Dover, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotaki, K. (1991)Report on the technological development test of long-term forecasting on fisheries and oceanographic conditions (Heisei 2 fiscal year). Japan Fisheries Information Service Center, Tokyo, Japan. pp. 81–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsuda, H., T. Wada, Y. Takeuchi and Y. Matsumiya (1991) Alternative models of species replacement of pelagic fishes.Res Popul. Ecol. 33: 41–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsuda, H., T. Kishida and T. Kidachi (1992) Optimal harvesting policy for chub mackerel in Japan under a fluctuating environment.Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 49: 1796–1800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitani, I. (1993) Does resource conservation contradict development of fisheries for chub mackerel?Proc. Fish. Res. Manag. 9: 8–14. (In Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pianka, E. R. (1978)Evolutionary ecology (2nd edition). Harper & Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pope, J. G. (1972) An investigation of the accuracy of virtual population using cohort analysis.Res. Bull. Int. Comm. Northwest. Atlant. Fish. 9: 65–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, W. J. (1980) Optimum age-specific harvesting in a nonlinear population model.Biometrics 36: 579–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe, T. (1983) Spawning survey method. pp. 9–29.In T. Ishii (ed.)Population dynamics of fishery resources. Koseisha-Koseikaku, Tokyo. (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Matsuda, H., Mitani, I. & Asano, K. Impact factors of purse seine net and dip net fisheries on a chub mackerel population. Res Popul Ecol 36, 201–207 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02514936

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02514936

Key words

Navigation