Abstract
Homo sociologicus and homo oeconomicus are, for different reasons, unsatisfactory models for the social sciences. A third model, called “rational model in the broad sense”, seems better endowed to cope with the many different expressions of rationality of the social agent. Some contributions by Weber, Durkheim and Marx are early examples of the application of this model of social explanation based on good subjective reasons. According to this model and to the evidence of cognitive anthropology, it is possible to reconcile primitive thinking with the inferential principles of Western people. Lastly, cognitive psychology can contribute to the discovery of generalizations of reason-based choices that can strengthen the explanatory power of “rational model in the broad sense”.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Berlin, B.O. & Kay, P.D. (1969)Basic Color Terms (Berkeley, University of California Press).
Boudon, R. (1981)The Logic of Social Action (London, Routledge).
Boudon, R. (1994)The art of self-persuasion (London, Polity Press).
Boudon, R. (1997) What theory of rationality for the social sciences: the cognitivist model,Society and Economy, Quarterly Journal of the Budapest University of Economic Sciences 1, pp. 75–105.
Choi, S. & Bowerman, M. (1991) Learning to express motion events in English and Korean: the influence of language-specific lexicalization patterns,Cognition, 41, pp. 83–121.
Choi, I., Nisbett, R.E. & Smith, E.E. (1997) Culture, Category Salience, and Inductive Reasoning,Cognition, 64, pp. 15–32.
Cole, M. (1977) An ethnographic psychology of cognition, in P. Johnson-Laird & P.C. Wason (Eds.)Thinking (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
Donovan, A., Laudan, L., & Laudan, R. (1988)Scrutinizing Science (Dordrecht: Kluwer).
Durkheim, E. (1897),Suicide, A Study in Sociology, (New York, The Free Press, 1962).
Durkheim, E. (1912),Le formes élementaires de la vie religieuse (Paris, Presses Universitaires de France, 1979).
Elster, J. (1985),Making sense of Marx (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
Evans-Pritchard, E.E. (1937),Witchcraft, Oracles and Magic among the Azande (Oxford, Clarendon).
Gladwin, T. (1970)East is a Big Bird (Cambridge, Harvard University Press).
Greenfield, P.M. & Childs, C. (1974) Weaving, color terms and patterns representation: cultural influences and cognitive development among Zinacantecos of southern Mexico, in J. Dawson & W. Lonner (Eds.)Reading in Cross-Cultural Psychology. Proceedings of the First International Conference of the International Association for Cross-Cultural Psychology (Hong Kong, University of Hong Kong Press).
Heider, E. R. (1972) Universals in color naming and memory,Journal of Experimental Psychology, 93, pp. 10–20.
Huber, J., Payne, J.W. & Pluto, C. (1982) Adding asymmetrical dominated alternatives: violations of regularity and similarity hypothesis,Journal of Consumer Research, 9, pp. 90–98.
Kanheman, D. & Tversky, A. (1979) Prospect Theory: an analysis of decision under risk,Econometrica, 47, pp. 263–291.
Levinson, S.C. (1994) Vision, shape and linguistic description: Tzeltal body part terminology and object description,Linguistics, 32, pp. 791–885.
Lopez, A., Atran, S., Coley, J.D., Medin, D.L. & Smith, E.E. (1997) The Tree of Life: Universal and Cultural Features of Folkbiological Taxonomies and Inductions,Cognitive Psychology, 32, pp. 251–295.
Malinowski, B. (1954)Magic, Science and Religion (New York: Doubleday).
Marx, K. (1867)Das Kapital (Hamburg, O. Meissner; New York, L. W. Schmidt).
Medin, D.L., Lynch, E., Coley, J.D. & Atran, S. (1977) Categorization and reasoning among tree experts: Do all roads lead to Rome?,Cognitive Psychology, 32, pp. 49–96.
Myrvold, W.C. (1996) Bayesianism and Diverse Evidence: A Reply to Andrew Wayne,Philosophy of Science, 63, pp. 661–665.
Olson, M. (1965)The Logic of Collective Action (Cambridge, Harvard University Press).
Osherson, D., Smith, E.E., Wilkie, O., Lopez, A. & Shafir, E. (1990) Category-based induction,Psychological Review, 97, pp. 185–200.
Osherson, D. & Viale, R. (1999) The difference phenomenon and the little scientist hypothesis. in L. Magnani, N. Nersessian & P. Thagard (Eds.)Model Base Reasoning in Scientific Discovery. Proceedings of MBR '98 Conference, forthcoming.
Rosch, E. (1972) The Structure of Color Space in Naming and Memory for Two Languages,Cognitive Psychology, 3, pp. 337–354.
Shapir, E. (1993) Choosing versus rejecting: why some options are both better and worse than others,Memory & Cognition, 21, pp. 546–556.
Shapir, E., Simonson, I. & Tversky, A. (1993) Reason-based choice,Cognition, 49, pp. 11–36.
Shweder, R.A. (1977) Likeness and likelihood in everyday thought: magical thinking and everyday judgments about personality, in P.N. Johnson-Laird & P.C. Wason (Eds.)Thinking (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
Simon, H. (1982),Models of Bounded Rationality (Cambridge, MIT Press).
Simonson, I. & Tversky, A. (1992) Choice in context: tradeoff contrast and extremeness aversion,Journal of Marketing Research, 29, pp. 281–295.
Tambiah, S.J. (1973) Form and meaning of magical acts: a point of view, in R. Horton & R. Finnegan (Eds.)Models of Thought (London, Faber and Faber).
Tversky, A. & Kanheman, D. (1974) Judgment under uncertainty heuristics and biases,Science, 185, pp. 1124–31.
Viale, R., & Osherson, D. (submitted). Category-based reasoning in Vietnam and Italy.
von Neumann, J. & Morgenstern, O. (1947)Theory of games and economic behavior (Princeton, Princeton University Press).
Weber, M. (1922)Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft (Tubingen, Mohr).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Boudon, R., Viale, R. Reasons, cognition and society. Mind & Society 1, 41–56 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02512228
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02512228