Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of electrode geometry and combination on nerve fibre selectivity in spinal cord stimulation

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Published:
Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The differential effects of the geometry of a rostrocaudal array of electrode contacts on dorsal column fibre and dorsal root fibre activation in spinal cord stimulation are analysed theoretically. 3-D models of the mid-cervical and mid-thoracic vertebral areas are used for the computation of stimulation induced field potentials, whereas a cable model of myelinated nerve fibre is used for the calculation of the excitation thresholds of large dorsal column and dorsal root fibres. The size and spacing of 2-D rectangular electrode contacts are varied while mono-, bi- and tripolar stimulation are applied. The model predicts that the highest preferential stimulation of dorsal root fibres is obtained in monopolar stimulation with a large cathode, whereas dorsal column fibre preference is highest in tripolar stimulation with small contacts and small contact spacings. Fibre type preference is most sensitive to variations of rostrocaudal contact size and least sensitive to variations of lateral contact size. Dorsal root fibre preference is increased and sensitivity to lead geometry is reduced as the distance from contacts to spinal cord is increased.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barolat, G., Massaro, F., He, J., Zeme, S., andKetcik, B. (1993): ‘Mapping of sensory responses to epidural stimulation of the intraspinal neural structures in man’,J. Neurosurg.,78, pp. 233–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barolat, G., Zeme, S., andKetcik, B. (1991): ‘Multifactorial analysis of epidural spinal cord stimulation’,Stereotact. Funct. Neurosurg.,56, pp. 77–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Coburn, B. (1985): ‘A theoretical study of epidural electrical stimulation of the spinal cord—Part II. Effect on long myelinated fibers’,IEEE Trans.,BME-32, pp. 978–986

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimitrijevic, M. R., Faganel, J., Sharkey, P.C., andSherwood, A. M. (1980): ‘Study of sensation and muscle twitch responses to spinal cord stimulation’,Int. Rehab. Med.,2, pp. 76–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Geddes, L. A., andBaker, L. E. (1967): ‘The specific resistance of biological material—a compendium of data for the biomedical engineer and physiologist’,Med. Biol. Eng.,5, pp. 271–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holsheimer, J., andStruijk, J. J. (1987): ‘Electrode combination and specificity in spinal cord stimulation’. Proc. IXth Conf. on Advances in External Control of Human Extremities, Belgrade, pp. 393–404

  • Holsheimer, J., andStruijk, J. J. (1991): ‘How do geometric factors influence epidural spinal cord stimulation? a quantitative analysis by computer modelling’,Stereotact. Funct. Neurosurg.,56, pp. 234–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Holsheimer, J., andStruijk, J. J. (1992): ‘Electrode geometry and preferential stimulation of spinal nerve fibers having different orientations: a modelling study’. Proc. 14th Ann. Int. Conf. of IEEE Eng in Med. & Biol. Soc., Paris, France, pp. 1374–1375

  • Holsheimer, J., Struijk, J. J., andSmink, J. (1992): ‘Effect of lead geometry and combination in ESCS’. Proc. 1st Int. Congress of Int. Neuromodulation Soc., Rome, Italy,abstract 75

  • Holsheimer, J., Den Boer, J. A., Struijk, J. J., andRozeboom, A. R. (1994): ‘MR assessment of the normal position of the spinal cord in the spinal canal,’Am. J. Neuroradiol.,15, pp. 951–959

    Google Scholar 

  • Jobling, D. T., Tallis, R. C., Sedgwick, E. M., andIllis, L. S. (1980): ‘Electronic aspects of spinal-cord stimulation in multiple sclerosis,’Med. Biol. Eng. Comp.,18, pp. 48–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Law, J. D. (1983): ‘Spinal stimulation: Statistical superiority of monophasic stimulation of narrowly separated, longitudinal bipoles having rostral cathodes,’Appl. Neurophysiol.,46, pp. 129–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, J. D. (r1987): ‘Targeting a spinal stimulator to treat the “failed back surgery syndrome”,ibid.,50, pp. 437–438

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, J. D., andMiller, L. V. (1982): ‘Importance and documentation of an epidural stimulating position’,ibid.,45, pp. 461–464

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeal, D. R. (1976): ‘Analysis of a model for excitation of myelinated nerve’,IEEE Trans.,BME-23, pp. 329–337

    Google Scholar 

  • Melzack, R., andWall, P. D. (1965): ‘Pain mechanisms: a new theory’,Sci. 150,Appl. Neurophysiol., pp. 971–979

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North, R. B. (1993): ‘Spinal cord stimulation for chronic, intractable pain’ in ‘Electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain and spinal cord’Devinski, O., Beric, A., Dogali, M. (Eds.) (Raven Press, New York) pp. 289–301

    Google Scholar 

  • North, R. B., Ewend, M. G., Lawton, M. T., andPiantadosi, S. (1991): ‘Spinal cord stimulation for chronic, intractable pain: superiority of “multi-channel” devices’,Pain,44, pp. 119–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rattay, F. (1986): ‘Analysis of models for external stimulation of axons’,IEEE Trans.,BME-33, pp. 974–977

    Google Scholar 

  • Rattay, F. (1987): ‘Ways to approximate current-distance relations for electrically stimulated fibers’,J. Theor. Biol.,125, pp. 339–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rijkhoff, N. J. M., Holsheimer, J., Koldewijn, E. L., Struijk, J. J., Van Kerrebroeck, P. E. V., Debruyne, F. M. J. andWijkstra, H. (1994): ‘Selective stimulation of sacral nerve roots for bladder control; a study by computer modeling’,IEEE Trans.,BME-41, pp. 413–424

    Google Scholar 

  • Shealy, C. N. (1974): ‘Electrical control of the nervous system’,Med. Progr. Technol. 2, pp. 71–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Shealy, C. N., Mortimer, J. T., andReswick, J. B. (1967): ‘Electrical inhibition of pain by stimulation of the dorsal columns: Preliminary clinical report’,Anesth. Analg. 46, pp. 489–491

    Google Scholar 

  • Struijk, J. J., Holsheimer, J., Barolat, G., He, J., andBoom, H. B. K. (1993a): ‘Paresthesia thresholds in spinal cord stimulation: a comparison of theoretical results with clinical data’,IEEE Trans.,RE-1, pp. 101–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Struijk, J. J., Holsheimer, J., andBoom, H. B. K. (1993b): ‘Excitation of dorsal root fibers in spinal cord stimulation: a theoretical study’,IEEE Trans,BME-40, pp. 632–639

    Google Scholar 

  • Struijk, J. J., Holsheimer, J., Van der Heide, G. G., andBoom, H. B. K. (1992): ‘Recruitment of dorsal column fibers in spinal cord stimulation: influence of collateral branching’,IEEE Trans. BME-39, pp. 903–912

    Google Scholar 

  • Struijk, J. J., Holsheimer, J., Van Veen, B. K., andBoom, H. B. K. (1991): ‘Epidural spinal cord stimulation: Calculation of field potentials with special reference to dorsal column nerve fibers’,IEEE Trans.,BME-38, pp. 104–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Tulgar, M., Barolat, G., andKetcik, B. (1993): ‘Analysis of parameters for epidural spinal cord stimulation. 1. Perception and tolerance thresholds resulting from 1,100 combinations’,Stereotact. Funct. Neurosurg.,61, pp. 129–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Wall, P. D., andSweet, W. H. (1967): ‘Temporary abolition of pain in man’,Sci.,155, pp. 108–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Holsheimer, J., Struijk, J.J. & Tas, N.R. Effects of electrode geometry and combination on nerve fibre selectivity in spinal cord stimulation. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 33, 676–682 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02510785

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02510785

Keywords

Navigation