Abstract
Modern instructional theories are characterized by their focus on rich, multidisciplinary and often collaborative learning tasks that are somehow representative for authentic, real life tasks. This new view on learning heavily increases the complexity of the design process and the resulting instructional systems. It is argued that computer-based instructional design (ID) tools may help to deal with this growing complexity. A framework to distinguish different kinds of ID tools is presented. This framework is then used to introduce the contributions to this special issue.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bastiaens, T., & Martens, R. (2000). Conditions for Web-based learning with real events. In B. Abbey (Ed.).Instructional and cognitive impacts of Web-based education (pp. 1–32). Hershey/London, UK: Idea Group Publishing.
Gery, G. (1991).Electronic performance support systems: How and why to remake the workplace through the strategic application of technology, Boston, MA: Weingarten Publications.
Gustafson, K., & Branch, R. (1997).Survey of instructional development models (3rd Ed.). Syracuse, NY: Eric Clearinghouse on Information and Technology.
Kessels, J. (1999). A relational approach to curriculum design. In J. van den Akker, R. Branch, K. Gustafson, N. Nieveen, & T. Plomp (Eds.)Design approaches and tools in education and training (pp. 59–71) Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Nieveen, N., & Gustafson, K. (1999). Characteristics of computer-based tools for education and training development: An introduction. In J. vanden Akker, R. Branch, K. Gustafson, N. Nieveen, & T. Plomp (Eds.),Design approaches and tools in education and training (pp. 155–174). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Reiser, R. (2001). A history of instructional design and technology. Part 2: A history of instructional design.Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(2), 57–67.
Simons, P.R.J., van der Linden, J., & Duffy, T. (2000).New learning, Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Tabbers, H., Martens, R., & van Merriënboer, J.J.G. (in press). Multimedia instructions and cognitive load theory: Effects of modality and cueing.British Journal of Educational Psychology.
Tripp, S.D., & Bichelmeyer, B. (1990). Rapid prototyping: An alternative instructional design strategy.Educational Technology Research and Development, 38(1), 21–44.
van den Akker, J., Branch, R., Gustafson, K., Nieveen, N., & Plomp, T. (1999).Design approaches and tools in education and training, Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
van Merriënboer, J.J.G. (1997).Training complex cognitive skills: A four-component instructional design model for technical training, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
Wang, W. (2001).Evaluation reports of ISD related EPSS products. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology (AECT), 7–9 November, Atlanta, GA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
van Merriënboer, J.J.G., Martens, R. Computer-based tools for instructional design: An introduction to the special issue. ETR&D 50, 5–9 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504980
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504980