Abstract
Holmström (Groves' schemes on restricted domains,Econometrica 47, 1979, pp. 1137–1144) showed for public decision making problems with a smoothly connected domain of preferences that Groves' schemes are the unique direct revelation mechanisms satisfying incentive compatibility. This paper provides necessary and sufficient conditions on the domain of preferences for which these Groves' schemes are the unique incentive compatible transfer schemes when the number of alternatives is finite. Furthermore, we give an example of a decision making problem that arises from a sequencing problem for which budget balanced Groves' schemes exist and show that these transfer schemes are not individually rational.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dolan, R., 1978, Incentive mechanisms for priority queueing problems, Bell Journal of Economics, 421–436.
Green, J. and J. Laffont, 1977, Characterization of satisfactory mechanisms for the revelation of preferences for public goods, Econometrica 45, 427–438.
Green, J. and J. Laffont, 1979, Incentives in public decision making (North-Holland, Amsterdam).
Groves, T., 1973, Incentives in teams, Econometrica 41, 617–633.
Groves, T. and M. Loeb, 1975, Incentives and public inputs, Journal of Public Economics 4, 211–226.
Holmström, B., 1979, Groves' schemes on restricted domains, Econometrica 47, 1137–1144.
Hurwicz, L. and M. Walker, 1990, On the generic nonoptimality of dominant-strategy allocation mechanisms: A general theorem that includes pure exchange economies, Econometrica 58, 683–704.
Laffont, J. and E. Maskin, 1982, The theory of incentives: An overview, In: W. Hildenbrand, ed., Advances in economic theory (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
Smith, W., 1956, Various optimizers for single stage production, Naval Research Logistics Quarterly 3, 59–66.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Suijs, J. On incentive compatibility and budget balancedness in public decision making. Economic Design 2, 193–209 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02499133
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02499133