Summary
Emergency peritoneoscopy (laparoscopy) to evaluate a suspected intraabdominal catastrophe was performed in ten critically ill patients over a 3-year period. The examination was negative in six cases, thereby avoiding celiotomy in this high-risk group. The examination was positive in four cases and, on this basis, celiotomy was recommended. Verification of the peritoneoscopic findings by clinical follow-up, operative findings, or autopsy was obtained in eight out of the ten cases. Based on our experience, we feel that peritoneoscopy is of value in defining the indications for celiotomy in this high-risk group of patients.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Berci G (1976) Laparoscopy in general surgery. In: Berci G (ed) Endoscopy. Appleton Century Crofts, New York, pp 382–400
Iberti T, Salky B, Onofrey D (1989) Use of bedside laparoscopy to identify intestinal ischemia in postoperative cases of aortic reconstruction. Surgery 105: 686–689
Treat MR, Forde KA, White J, Befeler D (1982) A technique for open peritoneoscopy. Surgery 92: 544–545
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Forde, K.A., Treat, M.R. The role of peritoneoscopy (laparoscopy) in the evaluation of the acute abdomen in critically ill patients. Surg Endosc 6, 219–221 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02498806
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02498806