Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Housing choice processes: Stated versus revealed modelling approaches

  • Published:
Netherlands journal of housing and the built environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aufhauser, E., Fischer, M.M., and Schonhofer, M. (1986), “A Disaggregated Probabilistic Approach to a Regulated Housing Market with Emphasis on the Demand Side: The Vienna Case”,Papers of the Regional Science Association (60), pp. 133–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boag, D.A., and Sarkar, A.K. (1984), “Housing Affordability and Acceptability as Influenced by Consumer Trade-off Perceptions”, Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation, Ottawa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, W.A.V., and Onaka, J.C. (1985) “An Empirical Test of a Joint Model of Residential Mobility and Housing Choice”,Environment and Planning A (17), pp. 915–930.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, M.M., and Aufhauser, E. (1988), “Housing Choice in a Regulated Market: A Nested Multinomial Logit Analysis”,Geographical Analysis (20), pp. 47–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goetgeluk, R., and Zwetselaar, M. (1994), “SubWon: Decision Plan Nets in a Longitudinal Perspecitive”, Paper presented at theSISWO Seminar on Choice Modelling in Housing Market Simulations, Amsterdam, May 27.

  • Huff, J.O., and Waldorf, B. (1988), “A Predictive Model of Residential Mobility and Residential Segregation”,Papers of the Regional Science Association (65), pp. 59–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joseph, A.E., Smit, B., and McIlravey, G.P. (1989) “Consumer Preferences for Rural Residences: A Conjoint Analysis in Ontario, Canada”,Environment and Planning A (21), pp. 47–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, R.L., and Menchik, M. (1976), “Conjoint Preference Estimation for Residential Land Use Policy Evaluation” in Golledge, R.G., and Rushton, G. (eds.),Spatial Choice and Spatial Behaviour, Columbus: Ohio State University Press, pp. 135–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindberg, E., Gärling, T., and Montgomery, H. (1988), “People’s Beliefs and Values as Determinants of Housing Preferences and Simulated Choices”,Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research (5), pp. 181–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindberg, E., Gärling, T., and Montgomery, H. (1989), “Belief-Value Structures as Determinants of Consumer Choice: A Study of Housing Preferences and Choice”Journal of Consumer Policy (12), pp. 119–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louviere, J.J. (1979), “Modelling Individual Residential Preferences: A Totally Disaggregate Approach”,Transportation Research A (13), pp. 373–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louviere, J.J., and Timmermans, H.J.P. (1990), “Hierarchical Information Integration Applied to Residential Choice Behaviour”,Geographical Analysis (22), pp. 127–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louviere, J.J., and Woodworth, G. (1983), “Design and Analysis of Simulated Consumer Choice or Allocation Experiments: An Approach Based on Aggregate Data”,Journal of Marketing Research (20), pp. 350–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFadden, D. (1978), “Modelling the Choice of Residential Location”, in Karlqvist, A. et al (eds.),Spatial Interaction Theory and Planning Models, Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 75–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molin, E., Oppewal, H., and Timmermans, H.J.P. (1994), “Residential Choice Behaviour of Communes: A Decompositional Multi-Person Preference Model”, Paper presented at the6th International Research Conference on Housing, Beijing, September 1994.

  • Onaka, J.C., and Clark, W.A.V. (1983), “A Disaggregate Model of Residential Mobility and Housing Choice”,Geographical Analysis (15), pp. 287–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oppewal, H., Louvier, J.J., and Timmermans, H.J.P. (1994), Modelling Hierarchical Conjoint Processes with Integrated Choice Experiments,Journal of Marketing Research 31, pp. 92–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oppewal, H., and Timmermans, H.J.P. (1991), “Context Effects and Decompositional Choice Modelling”,Papers in Regional Science (70), pp. 113–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Op ’t Veld, A., Timmermans, H.J.P., and Starmans, J. (1987), “Decision Nets and Housing Choice Processes: An Empirical Analysis”, Paper presented at the5th Colloquium on Theoretical and Quantitative Geography, Bardonnecchia, Italy, September 8–11.

  • Phipps, A.G. (1989), “Residential Stress and Consumption Disequilibrium in the Saskatoon Housing Market”,Papers of the Regional Science Association (67), pp. 71–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phipps, A.G., and Carter, J.E. (1984), “An Individual Level Analysis of the Stress-Resistance Model of Household Mobility”,Geographical Analysis (16), pp. 176–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phipps, A.G., and Carter, J.E. (1985), “Individual Differences in the Residential Preferences of Inner-City Households”,Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie (16), pp. 32–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quigley, J.M. (1985), “Consumer Choice of Dwelling, Neighborhood and Public Services”,Regional Science and Urban Economics (15), pp. 41–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohrman, B., and Borcherding, K. (1988), “The Cognitive Structure of Residential Decisions”, Paper presented at theXXIV International Congress of Psychology, Sydney.

  • Timmermans, H.J.P. (1984), “Decompositional Multiattribute Preference Models in Spatial Choice Analysis”,Progress in Human Geography (8), pp. 189–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timmermans, H.J.P. (1989), “Een Decompositioneel Hiërarchisch Model voor Woningkeuze: Theorie en Illustratie”, in Musterd, S. (ed.),Methoden voor Woning- en Woonmilieubehoeften Onderzoek, Amsterdam: SISWO, pp. 46–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timmermans, H.J.P., Borgers, A.W.J., Dijk, J. van, and Oppewal, H. (1992), “Residential Choice Behaviour of Dual-Earner Households: A Decompositional Joint Choice Model”,Environment and Planning A (24), pp. 517–533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timmermans, H.J.P., Borgers, A.W.J., and Veldhuisen, K.J. (1986), “A Hybrid Compensatory-Noncompensatory Model of Residential Preference Structures”,The Netherlands Journal of Housing and Environmental Research (1), pp. 227–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timmermans, H.J.P., and Heijden, R.E.C.M. van der (1987) “Uncovering Spatial Decision-Making Processes: A Decision Net Approach Applied to Recreational Choice Behaviour”,Tijdschrift voor Economische en Social Geografie (78), pp. 297–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timmermans, H.J.P., and Noortwijk, L.E. van (1994), “Modelling Substitution Effects in Housing Choice Behaviour within a Decompositional Framework: Theory and Illustration”,Environment and Planning A (in press).

  • Veldhuisen, K.J., and Timmermans, H.J.P. (1984), “Specification of Individual Residential Utility Functions”,Environment and Planning A (16), pp. 1573–1583.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Harry Timmermans
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Eric Molin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lily van Noortwijk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Timmermans, H., Molin, E. & van Noortwijk, L. Housing choice processes: Stated versus revealed modelling approaches. Neth J of Housing and the Built Environment 9, 215–227 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02496997

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02496997

Keywords

Search

Navigation