Skip to main content
Log in

Housing choice: Assumptions and approaches

  • Published:
Netherlands journal of housing and the built environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Residential mobility and housing choice are studied within a variety of research traditions. The traditions are classified into four approaches, depending on the conceptualization of housing choice they use. Four approaches of housing choice are distinguished: the continuous choice approach, the risk approach, the two-stage choice approach, and the three-stage search and choice approach. In the continuous choice approach, people are assumed to continuously choose between types of housing or levels of housing consumption. It is argued that this approach conforms to a concept of rationality used in the micro-economic sense of utility maximization. The other three approaches are more in line with a bounded rationality concept. They assume that people are not constantly evaluating their housing situation but consider moving only after a certain trigger has set off an intention to move. The three approaches assuming limited periods of housing choice differ in the way they treat triggers for moving versus resources, constraints, and opportunities. They also differ in terms of what is viewed as the object of choice. The risk approach does not explicitly model choice. The two-stage approach models the choice between various opportunities. And the three-stage approach models the choice between accepting and not accepting a particular opportunity “arriving” at a certain point in time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allison, P.D. (1982) “Discrete-time methods for the analysis of event histories”, in Leinhardt, S. (ed.),Sociological Methodology 1982, pp. 61–98, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allison, P.D. (1984)Event History Analysis. Regression for Longitudinal Event Data, Beverly Hills: Sage Publications (Sage University Pape no. 46).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, A.J. (1993) “Migration history, migration behavior and selectivity”,Annals of Regional Science (27), pp. 315–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, F.A. (1973)Residential Search Behavior, Toronto: York University (Geographical Monograph No. 1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Boehm, T.P. (1982) “A hierarchical model of housing choice”,Urban Studies (19), no. 1 pp. 17–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonvalent, C., and D. Arbonville (1996) “Residential itineraries in the Paris area”,Netherlands Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, this issue.

  • Bootsma, H.G. (1995) “The influence of a work-oriented life style on residential location choice of couples”,Netherlands Journal of Housing and the Built Environment (10), No. 1, pp. 45–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Börsch-Supan, A. (1990) “Panel data analysis of housing choices”,Regional Science and Urban Economics (20), pp. 65–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boumeester, H. (1996) “The choice for expensive owner-occupancy in the Netherlands”,Netherlands Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, this issue.

  • Brown, L.A., and J. Holmes (1971) “Search behavior in an intraurban migration context”,Environment and Planning A (3), pp. 307–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L.A., and E.G. Moore (1970) “The intra-urban migration process: a perspective,”Geografiska Annaler (52 B), pp. 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cadwallader, M. (1989) “A conceptual framework for analysing migration behaviour in the developed world”,Progress in Human Geography (13), no. 4, pp. 494–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, W.A.V. (1992) “Comparing cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses of residential mobility and migration”Environment and Planning A (24), pp. 1291–1302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, W.A.V., and R. Flowerdew (1982) “A review of search models and their application to search in the housing market”, in Clark W.A.V. (ed.),Modelling Housing Market Search, pp. 4–29, London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark W.A.V., and M. C. Deurloo, and F. M. Dieleman (1984) “Housing consumption and residential mobility”,Annals of the Association of American Geographers (74), no. 1, pp. 29–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark W.A.V., and J.L. Onaka (1983) “Life cycle and housing adjustment as explanations of residential mobility”,Urban Studies, (20), pp. 47–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark W.A.V., and J.L. Onaka (1985) “An empirical test of a joint model of residential mobility and housing choice”,Environment and Planning A (17), pp. 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark W.A.V., and T. R. Smith (1979) “Modeling information use in a spatial context”,Annals of the Association of American Geographers, (69), no. 4, pp. 575–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark W.A.V., and W.F.J. van Lierop (1986) “Residential mobility and household location modelling”, in Nijkamp P. (ed.),Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics. Volume I: Regional Economics, pp. 97–132, Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark W.A.V., M. C. Deurloo, and F.M. Dieleman (1994) “Tenure changes in the context of micro level family and macro level economic shifts”,Urban Studies (31), no. 1, pp. 137–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, W.A.V., M.C. Deurloo, and F.M. Dieleman (1997) “Entry into home ownership in Germany: comparisons with the United States”, Forthcoming inUrban Studies.

  • Courgeau D. (1985) “Interaction between spatial mobility, family and career life-cycle: a French survey”,European Sociological Review (1), no. 2, pp. 139–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Courgeau,D., and E. Lelièvre (1992) “Interrelations between first home-ownership, constitution of the family, and professional occupation in France”, in Trussel J., R. Hankinson, and J. Tilton (eds.),Demographic Applications of Event History Analysis, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DaVanzo J. (1981) “Microeconomic approaches to studying migration decisions”, in De Jong G.F., and R.W. Gardner (eds.),Migration Decision Making. Multidisciplinary Approaches to Microlevel Studies in Developed and Developing Countries, New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DaVanzo J., and P.A. Morrison (1978) “Dynamics of return migration: descriptive findings from a longitudinal study”, Santa Monica, California: The Rand Corporation (The Rand Paper Series no. P-5913).

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies R.B., and A.R. Pickles (1985) “Longitudinal versus cross-sectional methods for behavioural research: a first-round knockout”,Environment and Planning A (17), pp. 1315–1329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies R.B., and A.R. Pickles (1991) “An analysis of housing careers in Cardiff”,Environment and Planning A (23), pp. 629–650.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Bruijn B. (1992) “The concept of rationality in social sciences”, Amsterdam/Groningen: Postdoctorale Onderzoekersopleiding Demografie (PDOD-paper no. 9).

    Google Scholar 

  • De Jong G.F., and J.T. fawcett (1981) “Motivations for migration: an assessment and a value-expectancy research model”, in De Jong G.F., and R.W. Gardner (eds.),Migration Decision Making. Multidisciplinary Approaches to Microlevel Studies in Developed and Developing Countries, pp. 13–58, New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deane G.D. (1990) “Mobility and adjustments: paths to the resolution of residential stress”,Demography (27), no. 1, pp. 65–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desbarats J. (1983) “Spatial choice and constraints on behavior”,Annals of the Association of American Geographers (73), no. 3, 340–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deurloo M.C., W.A.V. Clark, and F.M. Dieleman (1990) “Choice of residential environment in the Randstad”,Urban Studies (27), no. 3, pp. 335–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deurloo M.C., W.A.V. Clark, and F.M. Dieleman (1994) “The move to housing ownership in temporal and regional contexts”,Environment and Planning A (26), pp. 1659–1670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deurloo M.C., F.M. Dieleman, and W.A.V. Clark (1987) “Tenure choice in the Dutch housing market”,Enviroment and Planning A (19), pp. 763–781.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickens P. (1989) “Human nature, society and the home”,Housing Studies (4), no. 4, pp. 227–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dieleman F.M., W.A.V. Clark, and M.C. Deurloo (1994) “Tenure choice: cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses”,Netherlands Journal of Housing and the Built Environment (9), no. 3, pp. 229–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dieleman F.M., and P.C.J. Everaers (1994) “From renting to owning: life course and housing market circumstances”,Housing Studies (9), no. 1, pp. 11–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doling J. (1976) “The family life cycle and housing choice”,Urban Studies (13), pp. 55–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs R.M., and D. Stea (1977)Maps in Minds: Reflections on Cognitive Mapping. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen G. (1990)The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fielding A.J. (1992) “Migration and social mobility: South East England as an escalator region”,Regional Studies (26), no. 1, pp. 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Findley S.E. (1982) “Methods of linking community-level variables with migration survey data”, inESCAP—National Migration Surveys. Volume X: Guidelines for Analysis, pp. 276–311, New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Floor, H., R. van Kempen, and A. de Vocht (1996) “Leaving Randstad Holland: an analysis of housing preferences with decision plan nets”,Netherlands Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, this issue.

  • Flowerdew R. (1992) “Labour market operation and geographical mobility”, in Champion T., and T. Fielding (eds.),Migration Processes and Patterns. Volume 1: Research Progress and Prospects, London: Belhaven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fotheringham A.S. (1986) “Modelling hierarchical destination choice”,Environment and Planning A (18), pp. 401–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fransson U., and K. Mäkilä (1994) “Residential choice in a time-space perspective: a micro-simulation approach”,Netherlands Journal of Housing and the Built Environment (9), No. 3, pp. 265–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner R.W. (1981) “Macrolevel influences on the migration decision process”, in De Jong G.F., and R.W. Gardner (eds.),Migration Decision Making. Multidisciplinary Approaches to Microlevel Studies in Veveloped and Developing Countries, New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens A. (1984)The constitution of society, Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goetgeluk, R.W., P. Hooimeijer, and F.M. Dieleman (1992) “The effectiveness of housing search: the role of motives for moving and housing market adjustment”, Paper prepared for the conference European Cities: Growth or Decline, The Hague, 13–16 April.

  • Gordon I., and R. Vickerman (1982) “Opportunity, preference and constraint: an approach to the analysis of metropolitan migration”,Urban Studies (19), no. 3, pp. 247–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould P.R., and R. White (1986) Mental maps. Second edition, Boston: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood M.J., P.R. Mueser, D.A. Plane, and A.M. Schlottmann (1991) “New directions in migration research. Perspectives from some North American regional science disciplines”,Annals of Regional Science (25), pp. 237–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grundy E.M.D., and A.J. Fox (1985) “Migration during early married life”,European Journal of Population (1), pp. 237–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hägerstrand T. (1970) “What about people in regional science?”,Papers of the Regional Science Association (24), pp. 7–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halfacree K.H., and P.J. Boyle (1993) “The challenge facing migration research: the case for a biographical approach”,Progress in Human Geography (17), No. 3, pp. 333–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haurin D.R., and H.L. Gill (1987) “Effects of income variability on the demand for owner-occupied housing”,Journal of Urban Economics, (22), pp. 136–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson J.V., and Y.M. Ioannides (1987) “Owner Occupancy: investment vs consumption demand”,Journal of Urban Economics (21), pp. 228–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henretta J.C. (1987) “Family transitions, housing market context, and first home purchase by young married households”,Social Forces (66), no. 2, pp. 520–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hensher D.A., and L.W. Johnson (1981)Applied Discrete Choice Modelling, London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooimeijer P., and H. Heida (1995) “Household projections and housing market behaviour”, in Van Imhoff E., A. Kuijsten, P. Hooimeijer, and L. van Wissen (eds.)Household Demography and Household Modelling, pp. 293–318, New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooimeijer, P., and A. Oskamp (1996) “Simulation models of residential mobility and housing choice”,Netherlands Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, this issue.

  • Hudson R. (1980) “Personal construct theory, the repertory grid method and human geography”,Progress in Human Geography (4), no. 3, pp. 345–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huff J.O. (1982) “Spatial aspects of residential search”, in Clark W.A.V., (ed.),Modelling Housing Market Search, pp. 106–129, London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingram, G.K., J.F. Kain, and J.R. Ginn (1972)The Detroit Prototype of the NBER Urban Simulation Model, New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janis, I.L., and L. Mann (1977)Decision Making. A Psychological Analysis of Conflict, Choice, and Commitment, New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendig, H.L. (1984) “Housing careers, life cycle and residential mobility: implications for the housing market”,Urban Studies (21), pp. 271–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kintrea, K., and D. Clapham (1986) “Housing choice and search strategies within an administered housing system”,Environment and Planning A (18), pp. 1281–1296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreibich, V., and A. Petri (1982) “Locational behaviour of households in a constrained housing market”,Environment and Planning A (14), pp. 1195–1210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruythoff, H. (1993)Residential Environments and Households in the Randstad, Delft: Delft University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landale, N.S., and A.M. Guest (1985) “Constraints satisfaction and residential mobility: Speare's model reconsidered”,Demography (22), No. 2, pp. 199–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lelièvre, E., and C. Bonvalet (1994) “A compared cohort history of residential mobility, social change and home-ownership in Paris and the rest of France”.Urban Studies (31), No. 10, pp. 1647–1665.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindenberg, S. (1990) “Homo Socio-oeconomicus: the emergence of a general model of man in the social sciences”,Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (146), pp. 727–748.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loikkanen, H.A. (1992) “Housing demand and tenure choice: evidence from Finland”,Netherlands Journal of Housing and the Built Environment (7), No. 1, pp. 9–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maclennan, D., and G. Wood (1982) “Information acquisition: patterns and strategies”, in Clark, W.A.V., (ed.),Modelling Housing Market Search, pp. 134–159, London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcuse, P. (1993) “What's so new about divided cities?”,International Journal of Urban and Regional Research (17), No. 3, pp. 355–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D.S. (1990) “Social structure, household strategies, and the cumulative causation of migration”Population Index (56), No. 1, pp. 3–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, K. (1982) “An analytical model of housing search and mobility”, in Clark, W.A.V., (ed.)Modelling Housing Market Search, pp. 30–53, London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, R. (1980) “A descriptive model of constrained residential search”,Geographical Analysis (12), No. 1, pp. 21–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michelson, W. (1977)Environmental Choice, Human Behavior, and Residential Satisfaction, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molin, E., H. Oppewal, and H. Timmermans (1996) “Predicting consumer response to new housing: a stated choice experiment”,Netherlands Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, this issue.

  • Mulder, C.H. (1993)Migration Dynamics: A Life Course Approach, Amsterdam: Thesis Publishers/PDOD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulder, C.H., and P. Hooimeijer (1995) “Moving into owner-occupation: compositional and contextual effects on the propensity to become a homeowner”,Netherlands Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, (10), No. 1, pp. 5–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulder, C.H., and D. Manting (1994) “Strategies of nest-leavers: ‘ettling down’ versus flexibility”,European Sociological Review (10), No. 2, pp. 155–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulder, C.H., and M. Wagner (1993) “Migration and marriage in the life course: a method for studying synchronized events”,European Journal of Population (9), No. 1, pp. 55–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onaka, J., and W.A.V. Clark (1983) “A disaggregate model of residential mobility and housing choice”,Geographical Analysis (15), pp. 287–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Op 't Veld, D., E. Bijlsma, and J. Starmans (1992) “Decision plan nets and expert systems tools, a new combination for application-oriented modelling of choice behaviour”,Netherlands Journal of Housing and the Built Environment (7), No. 1, pp. 101–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oskamp, A. (1994) “LocSim: A probabilistic model of choice heuristics”,Netherlands Journal of Housing and the Built Environment (9), No. 3, pp. 285–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, C.W., R.W. Hughes, V. Thukral, and R. Friedmann (1981) “Consumers' decision plans and subsequent choice behavior”,Journal of Marketing (45), pp. 33–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne, J.W., J.R. Bettman, and E.J. Johnson (1993)The Adaptive Decision Maker, Cambridge University Press.

  • Phipps, A.G., and R.J. Meyer (1985) “Normative versus heuristic models of residential search behavior: an empirical comparison”,Environment and Planning A (17), pp. 761–776.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phipps, A.G., and J.E. Carter (1985) “Individual differences in the residential preferences of inner-city homeowners”,Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie (76), No. 1, pp. 32–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phipps, A.G., and W.H. Laverty (1983) “Optimal stopping and residential search behavior”,Geographical Analysis (15), No. 3, pp. 187–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porell, F.W. (1982)Models of Intraurban Residential Relocation, Boston: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rima, A., and L.J.G. van Wissen (1987)A Dynamic Model of Household Relocation, a Case Study for the Amsterdam Region, Amsterdam: Free University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, P.H. (1955)Why Families Move. A Study in the Social Psychology of Urban Residential Mobility, Glencoe, Illinois: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudel, T.K. (1987) “Housing price, inflation, family growth, and the move from rented to owner occupied housing”,Urban Studies (24), pp. 258–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandefur, G.D., and W.J. Scott (1981) “A dynamic analysis of migration: an assessment of the effects of age, family and career variables”,Demography (18), No. 3, pp. 355–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, P. (1989) “The meaning of ‘home’ in contemporary English culture”,Housing Studies (4), No. 3, pp. 177–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, R.P. (1975)Migration Theory and Fact. A Review and Bibliography of Current Literature, Philadelphia: Regional Science Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A. (1979) “From substantive to procedural rationality”, in Hahn, F., and M. Hollis (eds.),Philosophy and Economic Theory, pp. 65–86, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjaastad, L.A. (1962) “The costs and returns of human migration”,Journal of Political Economy (70), pp. 80–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T.R., W.A.V. Clark, J.O. Huff, and P. Shapiro (1979) “A decision-making and search model for intraurban migration”,Geographical Analysis (11), No. 1, pp. 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Speare, A., Jr. (1974) “Residential satisfaction as an intervening variable in residential mobility”,Demography (11), No. 2, pp. 173–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speare, A., Jr., S. Goldstein, and W.H. Frey (1975)Residential Mobility, Migration, and Metropolitan Change, Cambridge, Mass: Ballinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thill, J.-C. (1992) “Choice set formation for destination choice modelling”,Progress in Human Geography (16), No. 3, 361–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorns, D.C. (1985) “Age and calendar time: two facets of the residential mobility process”,Environment and Planning A (17), pp. 829–844.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timmermans, H. (1984) “Decompositional multiattribute preference models in spatial choice analysis: a review of some recent developments”,Progress in Human Geography (8), No.2, pp. 189–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timmermans, H., E. Molin, and L. van Noortwijk (1994) “Housing choice processes: stated versus revealed modelling approaches”,Netherlands Journal of Housing and the Built Environment (9), No. 3, pp. 215–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Vaart, W. (1996)Inquiring into the Past: Data Quality of Responses to Retrospective Questions, Amsterdam: Free University (Thesis).

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Zwetselaar, M., and R. Goetgeluk (1994) “Decision plan nets of housing choice: a critical evaluation of the reliability and validity of this technique”,Netherlands Journal of Housing and the Built Environment (9), No. 3, pp. 247–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voets, S. (1994) “The concept of choice and relocation behaviour”, The Hague: Postdoctorale Onderzoekersopleiding Demografie (PDOD-paper no. 25).

  • Wagner, M. (1990) “Education and migration”, in Mayer, K.U., and N.B. Tuma (eds.)Event History Analysis in Life Course Research, Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wegener, M. (1983) “A simulation study of movement in the Dortmund housing market”,Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie (74), No. 4, pp. 267–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willekens, F. (1991) “Understanding the interdependence between parallel careers”, in Siegers, J.J., J. de Jong-Gierveld, and E. van Imhoff (eds.)Female Labour Market Behaviour and Fertility: A Rational-Choice Approach, pp. 2–31, Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witlox, F. (1995) “Qualitative housing choice modelling: decision plan nets versus decision tables”,Netherlands Journal of Housing and the Built Environment (10), No. 3, pp. 209–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolpert, J. (1965) “Behavioral aspects of the decision to migrate”,Papers of the Regional Science Association, XV, pp. 159–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolpert, J. (1966) “Migration as an adjustment to environmental stress”,Journal of Social Issues (XXII), No. 4, pp. 92–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamaguchi, K. (1991)Event History Analysis, Newbury Park: Sage (Applied Social Research Methods Series 28).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zelinsky, W. (1980) “The impasse in migration theory: a sketch map for potential escapees”, in Morrison, P.A., (ed.),Population Movements: Their Forms and Functions in Urbanization and Development, Liege, Belgium: IUSSP.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Clara H. Mulder holds a rearch fellowship of the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW) while being a member of the Falculty of Geographical Sciences at Utrecht University.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mulder, C.H. Housing choice: Assumptions and approaches. Neth J of Housing and the Built Environment 11, 209–232 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02496589

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02496589

Keywords

Navigation