Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of the solvent on the gas chromatographic behaviour of urea herbicides

  • Originals
  • Gas Chromatography
  • Published:
Chromatographia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Degradation products of chlorsulfuron, chlortoluron, diuron, fluometuron, isoproturon, linuron, metabenzthiazuron, metobromuron, and monuron formed in the gas chromatographic injector have been used for identification of the respective herbicides. Mass spectra of the derived compounds were obtained with a quadrupole mass spectrometric detector working in scan mode (20–450 amu). The compounds generated often depended on the solvent used for phenylurea herbicide injection (ethanol, methanol, dichloromethane, and acetonitrile). When methanol and ethanol were used as solvents the major products formed from phenylureas were carbamic acid esters. When acetonitrile or dichloromethane were used the main derivatives were phenylisocyanates. Chlorsulfuron and metabenzthiazuron, however, generated a triazine plus a phenylsulfonamide and a benzothiazolamine, respectively, irrespective of the solvent used. Linuron and diuron behaved similarly and gave degradation products with the same mass spectra. The thermal reactions occurred instantaneously in the injector block and were promoted by the high temperature selected (300°C).

Detemination of the compounds derived from urea herbicides, by use of a 30 m BP10 column and a selected ion registering (SIR) program based on two or three ions, can be used for sensitive detection of the presence of urea herbicides in environmental extracts. With standards in methanol instrument detection limits ranged from 0.1 pg for chlorsulfuron (detected as 2-chlorobenzensulfonamide) to 1 pg for monuron and metobromuron (both detected as their carbamic acid methyl esters).RSD were below 9% at the 5 ng L−1 level. The response was linearly dependent on quantily (r>0.9986) in the 5 ng L−1 to 25 μg L−1 range. Unequivocal identification of some phenylurea herbicides was not always possible because some herbicides with similar structures, for example diuron and linuron, gave the same derivative.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Strek, H.J.Pestic. Sci. 1998,53, 29–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Strek, H.J.Pestic. Sci. 1998,53, 52–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Chiron, S.; Dupas, S.; Scribe, P.; Barceló, D.J. Chromatogr. A 1994,665, 295–305.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Liu, C.-H.; Mattern, G.C.; Yu, X.; Rosen, R.T.; Rosen, J.D.J. Agric. Food Chem. 1991,9, 718–723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mattina, M.J.I.J. Chromatogr. 1991,549, 237–245.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Aguilar, C.; Ferrer, I.; Borrull, F.; Marcé, R.M.; Barceló, D.J. Chromatogr. A 1998,794, 147–163.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Krynitsky, A.J.JAOAC Int. 1997,80, 392–400.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. D'Ascenzo, G.; Gentili, A.; Marchese, S.; Marino, A.; Perret, D.Environ. Sci. Technol. 1998,32, 1340–1347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Marek, L.J.; Koskinen, W.C.J. Agric. Food Chem. 1996,44, 3878–3881.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bossi, R.; Koppen, B.; Spliid, N.H.; Streibig, J.C.JAOAC Int. 1998,81, 775–784.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Crescenzi, C.; Di Corcia, A.; Guerriero, E.; Samperi, R.Environ. Sci. Technol. 1997,31, 479–488.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hogenboorn, A.C.; Speksnijder, P.; Vreeken, R.J.; Niessen, W.M.A.; Brinkman, U.A.T.J. Chromatogr. A 1997,777, 81–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hogenboorn, A.C.; Niessen, W.M.A.; Brinkman, U.A.T.J. Chromatogr. A 1998,794, 201–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Albanis, T.A.; Hela, D.G.J. Chromatogr. A 1995,707, 283–292.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bengtsson, S.; Ramberg, A.J. Chromatogr. Sci. 1995,33, 554–556.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Patsias, J.; Papadopoulou-Mourkidou, E.J. Chromatogr. A 1996,740, 83–98.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Tekel, J.; Schultzová, K.; Kovacicova, J.; Brandsterterová, E.J. High. Resol. Chromatogr. 1993,16, 126–128.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Tekel, J.; Schultzová, K.; Farkas, P.; Kovacicova, J.; Brandsterterová, E.J. High. Resol. Chromatogr. 1991,14, 423–424.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bernal, J.L.; del Nozal, Ma. J.; Martin, M.T.; Jiménez, J.J.J. Chromatogr. A 1996,754, 245–256.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Pérez, S.; García-Baudín, J.M.; Tadeo, J.L.Fresenius J. Anal. Chem. 1991,339, 413–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Long, A.R.; Hsieh, L.C.; Malbrough, M.S.; Short, C.R.; Barker, S.A.J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. 1989,72, 813–815.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Pérez, S.; Matienzo, M.T.; Tadeo, J.L.Chromatographia 1993,36, 195–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. D'Amato, A.; Semeraro, I.; Bicchi, C.JAOAC Int. 1993, 76, 657–662.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Gelsomino, A.; Petrovicová, B.; Tiburtini, S.; Magnani, E.; Felici, M.J. Chromatogr. A 1997,782, 105–122.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Lanças, F.M.; Rissato, S.R.J. Microcolumn Sep. 1998,10, 473–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Liao, W.; Joe, T.; Cusick, W.G.,J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. 1991,74, 554–565.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Mattern, G.C.; Singer, G.M.; Louis, J.; Robson, M.; Rosen, J.D.J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. 1989,72, 970–974.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Wimmer, M.J.; Smith, R.R.J. Agric. Food Chem. 1991,39, 280–286.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Long, A.R.; Charkhian, B.; Hsieh, L.C.; Short, C.R.; Barker, S.A.J. Chromatogr. 1990,505, 395–401.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Berrada, H., Font, G. & Moltó, J.C. Influence of the solvent on the gas chromatographic behaviour of urea herbicides. Chromatographia 54, 253–262 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02492254

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02492254

Key Words

Navigation