Skip to main content
Log in

Response of flame ionization detectors to different homologous series

  • Originals
  • Gas Chromatography
  • Published:
Chromatographia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Hydrogen flame-ionization detectors (FIDs) are the most widely used type of detector in gas chromatography. The FID signals is proportional to the number of carbon atoms in a hydrocarbon molecule; the presence of heteroatoms usually reduces the signal. If the extent of the signal-reducing effect of heteroatoms were known, it would be possible to measure compounds which are not available as pure standards, or cannot be prepared, or their preparation is very expensive. The sensitivity of a detector to an organic molecule containing heteroatoms is referred to normal hydrocarbons by means of the effective carbon-atom number (ECN) value. By use of the values of increments inECN for heteroatoms and functional groups, theECN can be calculated for any organic molecule. For this, exact values of theECN increments are needed, and the effects of different factors on the increments must be known. In this study a wide range of homologues of normal paraffins, alcohols, amines, and esters was investigated, with emphasis on differences between the behaviour of lower and higher homologues. Studies were extended to theECN values of ketones, and aromatic and halogenated compounds. For all types of compound investigated the difference between the actual carbon number and the calculated effective carbon number (dECN) was compared with literature data, and an attempt was made to interpret the differences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Holm, T.J. Chromatogr. A 1999,842, 221–227.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Sternberg, J.C.; Gallaway, W.S.; Jones, D.T.L. InGas Chromatography: Brenner, N.; Callen, J.E.; Weiss, M.D., Eds, Academic Press, New York,1962.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Perkins, G. Jr.; Rouayheb, G.M.; Lively, L.D.; Hamilton, W.C. InGas Chromatography: Brenner, N.; Callen, J.E.; Weiss, M.D., Eds, Academic Press, New York,1962.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ettre, L.S. InGas Chromatography: Brenner, N.; Callen, J.E.; Weiss, M.D., Eds, Academic Press, New York,1962.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Halász, I.; Schneider, W. InGas Chromatography: Brenner, N.; Callen, J.E.; Weiss, M.D., Eds, Academic Press, New York1962.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jorgensen, A.D.; Picel K.C.; Stamoudis, V.C.Analytical Chemistry 1990,62, 683–689.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kállai, M., Veres, Z. & Balla, J. Response of flame ionization detectors to different homologous series. Chromatographia 54, 511–517 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02491209

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02491209

Key Words

Navigation