Skip to main content
Log in

Reliable validation based on optical flow visualization for CFD simulations

  • Published:
Acta Mechanica Sinica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A reliable validation based on the optical flow visualization for numerical simulations of complex flowfields is addressed in this paper. Several test cases, including two-dimensional, axisymmetric and three-dimensional flowfields, were presented to demonstrate the effectiveness of the validation and gain credibility of numerical solutions of complex flowfields. In the validation, images of these flowfields were constructed from numerical results based on the principle of the optical flow visualization, and compared directly with experimental interferograms. Because both experimental and numerical results are of identical physical representation, the agreement between them can be evaluated effectively by examining flow structures as well as checking discrepancies in density. The study shows that the reliable validation can be achieved by using the direct comparison between numerical and experiment results without any loss of accuracy in either of them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Babinsky H, Meguro T, Jiang Z, et al. Numerical visualization of shock wave flow in an expanding tube and comparison with experiment. In: Khalighi et al. eds. Exp and Numerical Flow Visualization, Vol 218, ASME, Hilton Head, South Carolina, 1995, 89–94

    Google Scholar 

  2. Babinsky H, Takayama K. CFD validation strategies for compressible flow using interferometry. AIAA 96-0438, 1996

  3. Havener AG, Obergefell LA. Computational interferometric description of nested flow fields.Optical Engineering, 1985, 24: 441–445

    Google Scholar 

  4. Yates LA. Images constructed from computed flow-field.AIAA Journal, 1993, 31: 1877–1884

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jiang Z, Takayama K. An investigation into the validation of numerical solutions of complex flowfields.J Computational Physics, 1999, 151: 479–497

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Inoue O, Takahashi M, Takayama K. Shock wave focusing in a log-spiral dust.AIAA Journal, 1993, 31: 1150–1155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sasoh A, Takayama K, Saito T. A weak shock wave reflection over wedges.Shock Waves, 1992, 2: 277–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sun M, Takayama K. A holographic interferometric study of shock wave focusing in a circular reflector.Shock Waves, 1996, 6: 323–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Takayama K, Jiang Z. Shock wave reflection over wedges: a benchmark test for CFD and experiments.Shock Waves, 1997, 7: 191–203

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Jiang Z, Liu J, Ni G, et al. The calculation of the density field from axisymmetric schlieren interferograms by the image processing techniques.Acta Mechanica Sinica, 1993, 9: 22–26

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Sharma SP, Ruffin S. Density measurements in an expanding flow using holographic interferometry. AIAA 92-0809, 1992

  12. Bone DJ. Fourier fringe analysis: the two-dimensional phase unwrapping problem.Applied Optics, 1991, 30: 3627–3632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Parker SCJ. The quantitative analysis of transonic flows by holographic interferometry. [PhD Thesis], University of Warwick, UK, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  14. Morton JW, Houwing AFP, Boyce RR, et al. Tomographic reconstruction of jet and shock layer flows. In: Houwing et al eds. Proc of the 21st Int Symp on Shock Waves, Vol 1, Great Keppel Island, Australia, July 20–25, 1987. 435–441

  15. Takeda M, Ina H, Kobayashi S. Fourier transform method of fringe-pattern analysis for computer-based tomography and interferometry.J Optics Soc Am, 1981, 22: 824–831

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jiang Z, Takayama K, Babinsky H, et al. Transient shock wave flows in tubes with a sudden change in cross section.Shock Waves, 1997, 7: 151–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jiang Z, Onodera O, Takayama K. Three-dimensional reflection of shock waves propagating in square cross-sectional tubes. In: Houwing et al. eds. Proc of the 21st Int Symp on Shock Waves, Vol 2, Great Keppel Island, Australia, July 20–25, 1987. 1499–1501

  18. Tam TC, Brock NJ, Cavolowsky JL, et al. Interferometry at the NASA-Ames hypervelocity free-flight aerodynamic facility. AIAA 91-0568, 1991

  19. Tamura Y, Fujii K. Visualization for computational fluid dynamics and the comparison with experiments. AIAA 90-3031, 1990

  20. Jiang Z, Takayama K, Chen YS. Dispersion conditions for non-oscillatory shock capturing schemes and its applications.Comp Fluid Dynamics J, 1995, 2: 137–150

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Jiang Z, Chen YS, Kuwahara K. Approximate non-reflecting inflow-outflow boundary conditions for calculations of Navier-Stokes equations for internal flows.Acta Mechanica Sinica, 1993, 9: 289–297

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhuang FG. On numerical techniques in CFD.Acta Mechanica Sinica, 2000, 16: 193–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Takayama K, Onodera O. Shock wave propagation past circular cross sectional 90° bends. In: Archer, Milton eds. Proc of the 14th Int Symp on Shock Tubes and Shock Waves, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia, 1983, 205–211

  24. Abe A. Shock waves discharged from the open end of shock tubes. [Doctoral Thesis], Graduate School of Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan, 1991

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zonglin, J. Reliable validation based on optical flow visualization for CFD simulations. Acta Mech Sinica 19, 193–203 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02484479

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02484479

Key Words

Navigation