Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of the effects of various anticancer agents on intestinal anastomosis after intraperitoneal administration

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Surgery Today Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, the effects of intraperitoneal 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), cisplatinum (Cis), adriamycin (Adr), and methotrexate (MTX) administration on rat intestinal anastomosis were compared. Cis and MTX led to significant weight loss in the first 5 days compared with the control group. Within 14 days all rats except the MTX group nearly reached their preoperative weight. No remarkable weight loss or systemic toxicity was observed among the 5-FU and Adr groups. The anastomosis bursting pressure (ABP) at 1 week was significantly lower than that of the control group (P<0.01 andP<0.005, respectively). On day 14 the anastomosis bursting pressure in the Cis group was similar to that of the control group but was significantly lower in the MTX group (P<0.002). Histopathologically, MTX avoided the development of a mucosal layer at the anastomosis site and led to ulcer formation in some of the rats. The ABPs at 7 and 14 days were similar to those in the control group. Neither of the agents had any significant mechanical or histopathologic adverse effects on anastomosis. According to the results of our study, MTX impaired the healing of the anastomosis, and we thus conclude that the intraperitoneal administration of this agent is not safe. On the other hand, Cis showed a detrimental effect on the anastomosis, particularly in the early phase, but this effect disappeared in the late phase. Cis thus should not be administered in the early postoperative phase. As a result, 5-FU and Adr were found to be the safest agents as they did not delay wound healing and did not reduce the anastomotic strength.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cohen AM, Shank B, Micheal AF (1993) Colorectal cancer. In: De Vita VT, Hellman S, Rasenberg SA (eds) Cancer principles and practice of oncology, 3rd edn. Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp 895–978

    Google Scholar 

  2. Higgins GA Jr., Amadeo JH, McElhinney J, McCaughan JJ, Keehn RJ (1984) Efficacy of prolonged intermittent therapy with combined 5-fluorouracil and methyl-CCNU following resection of carcinoma of large bowel. A Veterans Administration Surgical Oncology Group Report. Cancer 53:1–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Miller SK, Martindale RG, Gao XX, Gadacz TR (1996) The effects of octreotide on healing of small bowel anastomosis. Am Surg 62:733–737

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Shimizu T, Maeta M, Koga S (1991) Influence of local hyperthermia on the healing of small intestinal anastomoses in the rat. Br J Surg 78:57–59

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. van Doorn K, de Man B, Hendriks T (1990) The effects of lathyrogens on intestinal anastomosis in the rat. Exp Mol Pathol 52:37–45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Boring CC, Squires TS, Tong T (1992) Cancer Statist CA, 42:19–38

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Markman M, Reichman B, Hakes T, Jones W, Lewis JL Jr, Rubin S, Almadrones L, Hoskins W (1991) Responses to second-line cisplatin based intraperitoneal therapy in ovarian cancer: influence of a prior response to intravenous cisplatin. J Clin Oncol 9:1801–1805

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cohen SC, Gabelnick HL, Johnson RK, Goldin A (1975) Effects of antineoplastic agents on wound healing in mice. Surgery 78:238–244

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. de Waard JW, Wobbes T, de Man BM, van der Linden CJ, Hendriks T (1996) The effects of 5-fluorouracil and interferon-α on early healing of experimental intestinal anastomosis. Br J Cancer 74:711–716

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. de Waard JW, Wobbes T, Hendriks T (1993) Early post-operative 5-fluorouracil does not affect the healing of experimental intestinal anastomosis. Int J Colorect Dis 8:175–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. de Roy van Zuidewijn DBW, Hendriks T, Wobbes T, de Boer HH (1991) Intraperitoneal cytostatics impair healing of experimental intestinal anastomosis. Br J Cancer 63:937–941

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Engelmann U, Krug J, Sonntag W, Jacobi GH (1984) The effect of cisplatin on the healing of intestinal anastomosis in the rat. Microangiography and light microscopy studies. Urol Int 39:73–79

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wile AG, Dileo SK, Gossett DA, Lao XY (1993) Intraperitoneal cisplatin with sodium thiosulfate protection in rats with intestinal anastomosis. J Surg Oncol 52:265–268

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. de Roy van Zuidewijn DBW, Hendriks T, Wobbes T, Klompmakers AA, de Boer HHM (1987) Healing of experimental colonic anastomosis: effects of anticoplastic agents. Eur J Surg Oncol 13:2733

    Google Scholar 

  15. Aszodi A, Ponsky JL (1985) Effects of 5-fluorouracil on the healing of bowel anastomosis in rats. Am Surg 51:671–674

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Arikan, A.Y., Senel, F.M., Akman, R.Y. et al. Comparison of the effects of various anticancer agents on intestinal anastomosis after intraperitoneal administration. Surg Today 29, 741–746 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02482319

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02482319

Key Words

Navigation