Skip to main content
Log in

Lymphatic routes of the stomach demonstrated by gastric carcinomas with solitary lymph node metastasis

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Surgery Today Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To clarify whether or not the lymphatic routes that have long been generally accepted are indeed correct, we retrospectively examined the clinical records of patients with solitary lymph node metastasis from gastric carcinoma. From 735 patients gastrectomized with lymph node dissection (more than D1), 51 (7%) were histologically proven to have only one lymph node involved. In 44 of these 51 patients, the involved nodes were all in the perigastric region (N1). There were also 7 patients with a jumping metastasis to the N2–N3 nodes. Three of them were found along the left gastric artery (#7 according to Japanese classification) and the other 4 were found along either the common hepatic artery (#8) or the proper hepatic artery (#12). The depth of invasion was submucosal in 2, proper-muscular in 2, subserosal in 1, and serosa-exposed in 2, and the conclusive stage was II in 2, IIIa in 3, and IIIb in 2. However, 1 of these patients died of liver cirrhosis and 2 died of pneumonia, while the other 4 were still alive at the time of this report more than 5 years after surgery. These results suggest that not every sentinel node is located in the perigastric region near the primary tumor and that, if the preoperative examination indicates submucosal invasion, then a systematic regional lymph node dissection should therefore be carried out.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Volpe CM, Koo J, Miloro SM, Driscoll DL, Nava HR, Douglass HO Jr (1995) The effect of extended lymphadenectomy on survival in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma. J Am Coll Surg 181:56–64

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Maruyama K, Gunven P, Okabayashi K, Sasako M, Kinoshita T (1989) Lymph node metastases of gastric cancer: general pattern in 1931 patients. Ann Surg 210:596–602

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mishima Y, Hirayama R (1987) The role of lymph node surgery in gastric cancer. World J Surg 11:406–411

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Noguchi Y, Imada T, Matsumoto A, Coit DG, Brennan MF (1989) Radical surgery for gastric cancer: a review of the Japanese experience. Cancer 64:2053–2062

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Baba H, Maehara Y, Inutsuka S, Takeuchi H, Oshiro T, Adachi Y, Sugimachi K (1995) Effectiveness of extended lymphadenectomy in noncurative gastrectomy. Am J Surg 169: 261–264

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Maehara Y, Okuyama T, Moriguchi S, et al (1992) Prophylactic lymph node dissection in patients with advanced gastric cancer promotes increased survival time. Cancer 70:392–395

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Brady MS, Rogatko A, Dent LL, Shiu MH (1991) Effect of splenectomy on morbidity and survival following curative gastrectomy for carcinoma. Arch Surg 126:359–364

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wu CW, Hsieh MC, Lo SS, Wang LS, Hsu WH, Lui WY, Huang MH, P'eng FK (1995) Morbidity and mortality after radical gastrectomy for patients with carcinoma of the stomach. J Am Coll Surg 181:26–32

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dent DM, Madden MV, Price SK (1988) Randomized comparison of R1 and R2 gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma. Br J Surg 75:110–112

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Robertson CS, Chung SCS, Woods SDS, Griffin SM, Raimes SA, Lau JFT, Li AKC (1994) A prospective randomized trial comparing R1 subtotal gastrectomy and R3 total gastrectomy for antral cancer. Ann Surg 220:176–182

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bonenkamp JJ, Songun I, Hermans J, Sasako M, Welvaart K, Plukker JTM, van Elk P, Obertop H, Gouma DJ, Taat CW, van Lanschot J, Meyer S, de Graaf PW, von Meyenfeldt MF, Tilanus H, van de Velde CJH (1995) Randomized comparison of morbidity after D1 and D2 dissection for gastric cancer in 996 Dutch patients. Lancet 345:745–748

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Japanese Research Society for Gastric Cancer (1995) Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma. Kanehara, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  13. Iwashita T, Nishihara K, Abe Y, Ihara T, Nakahara S, Katsumoto F, Kurokawa Y, Tamae K, Mitsuyama S, Takeda S, Abe R, Toyoshima S (1996) Risk factors of lymph node metastases and recurrence from intramucosal gastric cancer. J Jpn Surg Soc 57:2119–2123

    Google Scholar 

  14. Imada T, Takehara T, Rino Y, Suzuki M, Takahashi M, Chinn C, Noguchi Y, Yamamoto Y, Amano T, Matsumoto A, Kobayashi O, Sairenji M, Motohashi H (1995) Indications for pylorus preserving gastrectomy for early gastric cancer. Jpn J Gastroentrol Surg 28:2248–2255

    Google Scholar 

  15. Natsugoe S, Aikou T, Shimada M, Yoshitake H, Takao S, Shimazu H, Matsushita Y (1994) Occult lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer with submucosal invasion. Surg Today 24:870–875

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ishihara S, Nishi M, Ohyama S, Yamada H, Takahashi T, Nakajima T, Ohta K (1996) Transverse gastrectomy for early gastric cancer—clinical study on 46 patients. J Jpn Surg Soc 57:291–297

    Google Scholar 

  17. Arai K, Kitamura M, Iwasaki Y (1996) The possibility of limited operation for submucosal gastric carcinomas: analysis of nodal involvement according to the extent of submucosal invasion. J Jpn Surg Soc 57:2375–2379

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kosaka, T., Ueshige, N., Sugaya, J. et al. Lymphatic routes of the stomach demonstrated by gastric carcinomas with solitary lymph node metastasis. Surg Today 29, 695–700 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02482311

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02482311

Key words

Navigation