Skip to main content
Log in

Biocompatibility of MPC: in vivo evaluation for clinical application

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Artificial Organs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Biocompatibility is important to assure a mild body reaction to an implanted device and its long-term stability and functionality. In diabetes research, subcutaneously implanted glucose monitoring systems need biocompatible surfaces for long-term application. The biocompatibility of poly(2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine-co-n-butyl methacrylate) (MPC), a material similar to the phospholipid layer of a cell membrane, was compared in vivo with the biocompatibility of polyurethane (PU), polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), and cuprophane (CUP). Needle-type glucose sensors and hollow-fiber probes used for microdialysis were coated with these four different biomaterials and implanted subcutaneously in 18 rats and 7 healthy volunteers. At set intervals, the implants and, in the case of the rats, also the surrounding tissue were removed and characterized by light and electron microscopy. MPC-coated sensors and hollow-fiber probes showed smooth and thin deposits in flat layers, whereas the surface deposits on PU- and PVA-coated sensors and those on CUP hollow-fiber probes appeared as rough, irregular, and dense attachments of aggregated cells and protein. This study confirmed results from earlier in vitro tests by showing the biocompatibility and reliability of MPC. Even though the amount of protein and cells attached to the MPC surface was not as low as expected from in vitro experiments, the biocompatibility and long-term stability of the implanted devices were superior to those of PU, PVA, and CUP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shichiri M, Kishikawa H, Sakakida M, Kajiwara K, Hashiguchi Y, Nishida K, Uemura T, Konno Y, Ichinose K. Artificial endocrine pancreas and optimal blood glucose regulation in diabetic patients —from bedside-type to wearable-type. Diabetes Res Clini Pract 1994;24:S251-S259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Shichiri M, Sakakida M, Nishida K, Shimoda S, Konno Y, Miyata T. Wearable-type artificial endocrine pancreas and optimal blood glucose regulation in diabetic patients. Diabet Rec Int 1995;4:10–14

    Google Scholar 

  3. Shichiri M, Kawamori R, Yamasaki Y, Hakui N, Abe H. Wearable artificial endocrine pancreas with needle-type glucose sensor. Lancet 1982;2:1129–1131

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hashiguchi Y, Sakakida M, Nishida K, Uemura T, Kajiwara K, Shichiri M. Development of a miniaturized glucose monitoring system by combining a needle-type glucose sensor with microdialysis sampling method. Diabet Care 1994;17:387–396

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Woodward SC, Salthouse TN. The tissue response to implants and its evaluation by light microscopy. In: Von Recum AF (ed) Handbook of biomaterials evaluation. New York: Macmillan, 1986;364–378

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ishihara K. Novel polymeric material for obtaining blood-compatible surfaces. Trends Polym Sci 1997;5:401–407

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ishihara K, Shibata N, Tanaka S, Iwasaki Y, Kurosaki T, Nakabayashi N. Improved blood compatibility of segmented polyurethane by polymeric additives having phospholipid polar group. II. Dispersion state of the polymeric additive and protein adsorption on the surface. J Biomed Mater Res 1996;32:401–408

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang S, Benmakroha Y, Rolfe P, Tanaka S, Ishihara K. Development of a haemocompatible pO2 sensor with phospholipid-based copolymer membrane. Biosensors Bioelectronics 1996;11:1019–1029

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Yu J, Lamba NMK, Courtney JM, Whateley TL, Gaylor JDS, Lowe GDO, Ishihara K, Nakabayashi N. Polymeric biomaterials: influence of phosphorylcholine polar groups on protein adsorption and complement activation. Int J Artif Organs 1994;17:499–504

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Nishida K, Sakakida M, Ichinose K, Uemura T, Uehara M, Kajiwara K, Miyata T, Shichiri M, Ishihara K, Nakabayashi N. Development of a ferrocene-mediated needle-type glucose sensor covered with newly designed biocompatible membrane, 2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine-co-n-butyl methacrylate. Med Prog Technol 1995;21:91–103

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ishihara K, Miyazaki H, Kurosaki T, Nakabayashi N. Improvement of blood compatibility on cellulose dialysis membrane. III. Synthesis and performance of water-soluble cellulose grafted with phospholipid polymer as coating material on cellulose dialysis membrane. J Biomed Mater Res 1995;29:181–188

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ishihara K, Nakabayashi N. Hemocompatible cellulose dialysis membranes modified with phospholipid polymers. Artif Organs 1995;19:1215–1221

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ishihara K, Ueda T, Nakabayashi N. Preparation of phospholipid polymers and their properties as polymer hydrogel membranes. Polym J 1990;22:355–360

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Shichiri M, Sakakida M, Nishida K, Shimoda S. Enhanced, simplified glucose sensors long-term clinical application of wearable artificial endocrine pancreas. Artif Organs 1998;22:32–42

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Karnovsky MJ. A formaldehyde-glutaraldehyde fixative of high osmolality for use in electron microscopy. J Cell Biol 1965;27: 137A-138A

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ishihara K, Tanaka S, Furukawa N, Kurita K, Nakabayashi N. Improved blood compatibility of segmented polyurethane by polymeric additives having phospholipid polar groups. I. Molecular design of polymeric additives and their function. J Biomed Mater Res 1996;32:391–399

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. DeFife KM, Yun JK, Azeez A, Stack S, Ishihara K, Nakabayashi N, Colton E, Anderson JM. Adhesion and cytokine production by monocytes on poly(2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholineco-alkyl methacrylate)-coated polymers. J Biomed Mater Res 1995;29:431–439

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ueda T, Oshida H, Kurita K, Ishihara K, Nakabayashi N. Preparation of 2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine copolymers with alkyl methacrylates and their blood compatibility. Polym J 1992;24:1259–1269

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ishihara K. Blood compatible polymers. In: Tsuruta T, Hayashi T, Ishihara K, Kataoka K, Kimura Y (eds) Biomedical applications of polymeric materials. Boca Raton: CRC, 1993;89–115

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ishihara K, Fukumoto K, Miyazaki H, Nakabayashi N. Improvement of hemocompatibility on a cellulose dialysis membrane with a novel biomedical polymer having a phospholipid polar group. Artif Organs 1994;18:559–564

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Reach G, Wilson GS. Can continuous glucose monitoring be used for the treatment of diabetes? Anal Chem 1992;64:381A-386A

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Mirzadeh H, Katbab AA, Khorasani M T, Burford E, Gorgin E, Golestani A. Cell attachment to laser-induced Aam- and HEMA-grafted ethylene-propylene rubber as biomaterial: in vivo study. Biomaterials 1995;16:641–648

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Iwasaki Y, Mikami A, Kurita K, Yui N, Ishihara K, Nakabayashi N. Reduction of surface-induced platelet activation on phospholipid polymer. J Biomed Mater Res 1997;36:508–515

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Shichiri M, Fukushima H, Yamaguchi K, Kawamori R, Yamasaki Y, Ueda N, Kamada T. Membrane design for extending the longlife of an implantable glucose sensor. Diabet Nutr Metab 1989;2:309–313

    Google Scholar 

  25. Burczak K, Gamian E, Kochman A. Long-term in vivo performance and biocompability of poly(vinyl alcohol) hydrogel macrocapsules for hybrid-type artificial pancreas. Biomaterials 1996;17:2351–2356

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Williams DF. Biomaterials and biocompatibility. Med Progr Technol 1976;4:31–42

    Google Scholar 

  27. Reach G, Wilson GS. Can continuous glucose monitoring be used for the treatment of diabetes? Anal Chem 1992;64:381–386

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hall B, Bird RR, Kojima M, Chapman D. Biomembranes as models for polymer surfaces. V. Thrombelastographic studies of polymeric lipids and polyesters. Biomaterials 1989;10:219–224

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kenro Nishida MD, PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nowak, T., Nishida, K., Shimoda, S. et al. Biocompatibility of MPC: in vivo evaluation for clinical application. J Artif Organs 3, 39–46 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02479925

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02479925

Key words

Navigation