Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of mathematical models for cat lung and viscoelastic balloon derived by laplace transform methods from pressurevolume data

  • Published:
The bulletin of mathematical biophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The mechanical properties of some hollow organs are most conveniently described by a pressure-volume relationship. If the material exhibits hysteresis, thep-v relation must include provision for time-dependent or path-dependent properties. Provided the amplitude of deformation is fairly small and the hysteresis is primarily of the viscoelastic type, a linear description is possible. That this may take the form of a simple transfer function in which material properties are implicit is illustrated for the case of a rubber balloon. The transfer function was derived from the pressure transients which follow step changes in volume produced in a fluid-filled plethysmograph. The applicability of the transfer function in predicting responses to other forcing functions was tested by varying the balloon volume sinusoidally over a frequency range of 1000, at 4 different amplitudes. The good agreement between the linear model and all types of data justifies the use of Laplace transform methods and the assumption that superposition holds. When isolated cat lung is tested in the same manner, the transfer function quantitatively predicts the magnitude ratio of sinusoidal responses but only about two-thirds of the phase angle. The additional energy loss per cycle is interpreted as arising from static hysteresis. The analysis thus provides a simple means of estimating the relative contributions of viscoelastic (dynamic) and static hysteretic processes to the total damping in a material.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature

  • Eirich, F. R. 1958.Rheology, Theory and Applications, Vol. II. New York: Academic Press, Inc.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ferry, J. D. 1961.Viscoelastic Properties of Polymers. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, A. E. and J. E. Adkins. 1960.Large Elastic Deformations and Nonlinear Continuum Mechanics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hildbrandt, J., H. Fukaya and C. J. Martin. “Stress-strain Relations of Tissue Sheets Undergoing Two-dimensional Stretch.”J. Appl. Phys. (in press).

  • Kohlrausch, F. 1866. “Beiträge zur Kenntniss der elastischen Nachwirkung.”Poggend. Annal. d. Physik u. Chemie.,128, 1–20, 207–227, 399–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langelaan, J. W. 1915. “On Muscle Tonus.”Brain,38, 235–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazan, B. J. 1968.Damping of Materials and Members in Structural Mechanics. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, P. 1905. “The Slow Stretch in India Rubber, Glass, and Metalv Wires when Subjected to a Constant Pull.”Phil. Mag., 6th Ser.9, 513–531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trouton, F. T. and A. O. Rankine. 1904. “On the Stretching and Torsion of Lead Wire Beyond the Elastic Limit.” —Ibid., 6th Ser.8, 538–556.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, W. 1841. “Ueber die Elasticität fester Körper.”Poggend. Anal. d. Physik u. Chemie.,54, 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hildebrandt, J. Comparison of mathematical models for cat lung and viscoelastic balloon derived by laplace transform methods from pressurevolume data. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics 31, 651–667 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02477779

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02477779

Keywords

Navigation