Abstract
It has been concluded in this study that the evidence of arcing is not a sufficient reason to blame electricity as the cause of fire.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Béland, B., “Examination of Electrical Conductors Following a Fire,”Fire Technology, Vol. 16, No. 4 (November 1980), pp. 252–258.
Béland, B., “Arcing Phenomenon as Related to Fire Investigations,”Fire Technology, Vol. 17, No. 3 (August 1981), pp. 189–201.
Ettling, B. V., “Arc Marks and Gouges in Wires and Heating at Gouges,”Fire Technology, Vol. 17, No. 2 (May 1981), pp. 61–68.
Buxten, E., Donaldson, J. L., McDowell, E. C., “Hazard Assessment of Aluminum Electrical Wiring in Residential Use,” National Bureau of Standards, Wash., No. NBSIR-75-677 (December 1974), 59 pages.
McPartland, J. F., “All these ‘Electrical’ Fires? Hogwash!!!,” Electrical Construction and Maintenance (January 1981), pp. 11–18.
Cooper, W. F., “Electrical Safety Engineering”, (book 1978), Newnes-Buttewroths, London-Boston, p. 229.
Béland, B., “The Overloaded Circuit as a Fire Cause,”The Fire and Arson Investigator, Vol. 32, No. 1 (July–September 1981), pp. 13–18.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Note: Dr. Béland is Professor of Electrical Engineering at the University of Sherbrooke.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Béland, B. Considerations on arcing as a fire cause. Fire Technol 18, 188–202 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02473108
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02473108