Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of compound compliance criteria for concrete strength

  • Published:
Materials and Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the compliance control of concrete, different types of criterion are in use. In particular, compound criteria are often used since this type of criterion appears in the CEB-FIP Model Code for Concrete Structures. In this paper, the dependency between the minimumvalue and the mean-value criteria is shown not to be negligible. The usefulness of a minimum-value criterion is questioned, as generally it unnecessarily decreases the probability of acceptance for low defective fractions. The preliminary application of an outlier criterion is suggested as a more consistent approach. Finally, criteria of the type\(\bar x_n \geqslant f_{ck} + \lambda s_n \) are proposed, where the numerical values of λ are fixed in such a way that the resulting OC lines are tangent to a continuous boundary line for the unsafe region.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kendall, M. and Stuart, A.,The Advanced Theory of Statistics, Vol. 2 (1979), (Griffin, London) 139.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Owen, D.,Handbook of Statistical Tables (Addison-Wesley, 1962) 117.

  3. CEB-FIP,Model Code for Concrete Structures Vols I and II, 3rd Edn Bulletin d'information CEB No. 124-125 (1978) 273.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lambotte, H., ‘Compliance control of concrete—A survey of the present and a view to the future’,Baustoffe '85 (Karlhans Wesche gewidmet), RWTH, Aachen, 1985, 99.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cehn, J.-F., Han, S.-F. and Wu, C.-Y., ‘Criteria for acceptance testing on strength of concrete’,Proceedings of RILEM Symposium on Quality Control of Concrete Structures, (Swedish Cement and Concrete Research Institute, Stockholm, 1979) 133.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Taerwe, L., ‘The influence of autocorrelation on OC-lines of compliance criteria for concrete strength’,Mater. Struct. (1987), 418.

  7. NBN B15-102,Beton, Gewapend beton en voorgespanen beton (BIN, 1976) 12.

  8. Taerwe, L., ‘A general basis for the selection of compliance criteria’,IABSE Proceedings P-102/86, August 1986 113.

  9. Idem,,Aspects of the stochastic nature of concrete strength including compliance control, Doctoral thesis, University of Ghent, Ghent (1985) (in Dutch) 4.1.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Idem, ‘Detection of inherent heterogeneities in cement strength records by means of segmentation’, Uniformity of concrete strength, ASTM STP 961, E. Farkas and P. Klieger, Eds. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, 1987, 42.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rackwitz, R., ‘Predictive distribution of strength under control’,Mater. Struct. 16(94) 259.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Taerwe, L. Evaluation of compound compliance criteria for concrete strength. Materials and Structures 21, 13–20 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02472524

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02472524

Keywords

Navigation