Skip to main content
Log in

The usefulness of CEA as an indicator for early detection and a guide to the treatment of recurrent gastric cancer

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
The Japanese journal of surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The usefulness of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) as an indicator for recurrence and a guide to the treatment was evaluated from a retrospective analysis of 88 patients with recurrent gastric cancer. Sixty-two of these patients (70.5 per cent), 25 of whom had a preoperative positive assay, and 37 a negative assay, had elevated levels of CEA after disease progression. Averaged CEA level in patients with liver metastasis was significantly higher (872 ng/ml) than in those with peritoneal metastasis (68 ng/ml), with lymph node metastasis (103 ng/ml) or with local metastasis (93 ng/ml) (p<0.01). An elevation of CEA was found prior to the clinical manifestation of recurrence, and the average lead time was 4 months. In 25 patients with a lead time of more than 4 months, survival time after CEA elevation was 13.3 months, which was longer than the 6.5 months of 28 patients with less than 4 months. Thirty-seven of the 88 patients were treated after recurrence. The average survival period after the detection of recurrence was 9.4 months in patients with surgical treatments followed by chemotherapy, 5.9 months in those with chemotherapy alone and 3.8 months in those with surgery alone. The average survival period of 26 patients with positive CEA assays in recurrence was 5.1 months longer than of patients with negative assays. This fact suggested that early detection of recurrence followed by various treatments, in the elevated CEA group, contributes to favorable results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Miwa K, Cancer of the stomach in Japan. In: Kajitani T, Koyama T, Umegaki T, eds. Gann monograph No. 22 Recent Results of Cancer Treatment in Japan. Tokyo: Japan Scientific Societies Press, Baltimore: Universe Park Press, 1971; 61–75.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Holyoke D, Reynoso G, Chu TM. Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in patients with carcinoma of the digestive tract. Ann Surg 1972; 176: 559–564.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Zamcheck N. The present status of CEA in diagnosis, prognosis, and evaluation of therapy. Cancer 1975; 36: 2460–2468.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Serokin JJ Sugarbaker PH, Zamcheck N, Pisick M, Kupchik HZ, Moore FD. Serial carcinoembryonic antigen assays—Use in detection of cancer recurrence. JAMA 1974; 228: 49–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ellis DJ, Specirs C Kingaton RD, Brookes VS, Leonald J, Dykes PW. Carcinoembryonic antigen levels in advanced gastric carcinoma. Cancer 1978; 42: 623–625.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Jalanko H, Hoglund C, Roberts PJ, Kuusela P. Tumor markers in gastrointestinal cancers. In: Holgren J ed. Tumor Marker Antigens. Lund: Studentliteratur 1985; 114–122.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tamada R, Hiramoto Y, Abe Y, Notsuka T, Okamura T, Masuda H, Kano T, Kumashiro R, Inokuchi K. Serial determinations of carcinoem-bryonic antigen for early detection of recurrent gastric cancer. Jpn J Surg 1982; 12: 429–433.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Egan ML, Lautenschlagen JT, Coligan JE, Todd CW. Radioimmune assay of carcinoembryonic antigen. Immunochemistry 1972; 9: 289–299.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wanebo HJ, Stearns M, Schwarz MK. Use of CEA as an indicator of early recurrence and as a guide to a selected second-look procedure in patients with colorectal cancer. Ann Surg 1978; 188: 481–493.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Mach JP, Jaeger PH, Bertholet MM, Ruegsegger CH, Loosli RM, Pettavel J. Detection of recurrence of large-bowel carcinoma by radioimmunoassay of circulating carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). Lancet 1974; 2: 535–540.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Staab HJ, Anderer FA, Brummendorf T, Hornung A, Fischer R. Prognostic value of preoperative serum CEA level compared to clinical staging: stomach cancer. Br J Cancer 1982; 45: 718–727.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Martin EW, James KK, Hurtubise PE, Catalano P, Minton JP. The use of CEA as an early indicator for gastrointestinal tumor recurrence and second-look procedures. Cancer 1977; 39: 440–446.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Steele G Jr, Zamcheck N, Wilson R, Mayer R, Lokich J, Rau P, Maltz JP. Results of CEA initiated second-look surgery for recurrent colorectal cancer. Am J Surg 1980; 139: 544–547.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kano, T., Koga, T., Souda, K. et al. The usefulness of CEA as an indicator for early detection and a guide to the treatment of recurrent gastric cancer. The Japanese Journal of Surgery 17, 269–275 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02470699

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02470699

Key Words

Navigation