Skip to main content
Log in

Studies on the amphisphaeriales I. The clypeosphaeriaceae

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Mycoscience

Abstract

The Clypeosphaeriaceae is retained to include sixteen genera.Apioclypea, Ceratostomella, Clypeophysalospora, Clypeosphaeria, Crassoascus, Jobellisia, Oxydothis andUrosporella are described and illustrated, whileApiorhynchostoma, Brunneiapiospora, Capsulospora, Duradens, Frondispora, Leiosphaerella, Pseudovalsaria andStereosphaeria are discussed. Genera in the Clypeosphaeriaceae are distinguished from those in, the Amphisphaeriaceae (sensu stricto). Their ascomata are immersed and typically clypeate. Asci are 8-spored, unitunicate, cylindrical, with a J+ or J−, apical ring. Ascospores are usually ellipsoidal or cylindrical, brown or hyaline, unicellular, pseudoseptase or septate, at times with appendages or germ pores. The Clypeosphaeriaceae is considered a member of the Amphisphaeriales and the differences between the Clypeosphaeriaceae and Amphisphaeriaceae are discussed. We are unsure if the Clypeosphaeriaceae as we define it is monophyletic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  • Andersson, K., Eriksson, O. E. and Landvik, S. 1995. Boliniaceae transferred to Sordariales (Ascomycota). Syst. Ascomycet.14: 1–16.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Arx, J. A. von and Müller, E. 1954. Die Gattungen der amerosporen Pyrenomyceten. Beitr. Kryptogamenfl. Schweiz11 (1): 1–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, G. F. 1897. Some fungi from Alabama. Bull. Cornell Univ. (Sci.)3: 1–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barr, M. E. 1966. Observations onUrosporella. Mycologia58: 690–693.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barr, M. E. 1989.Clypeosphaeria and the Clypeosphaeriaceae. Syst. Ascomycet.8: 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barr, M. E. 1990. Prodromus to nonlichenized, pyrenomycetous members of class Hymenoascomycetes. Mycotaxon39: 43–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barr, M. E. 1993. Redisposition of some taxa described by J. B. Ellis. Mycotaxon46: 45–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barr, M. E. 1994. Notes on the Amphisphaeriaceae and related families. Mycotaxon51: 191–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrasa, J. M., Checa, J. and Martínez, A. T. 1993.Crassoascus, a new nonstromatic genus in the Clypeosphaeriaceae. Mycotaxon46: 299–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements, F. E. and Shear, C. L. 1931. The genera of fungi. H. W. Wilson, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, R. W. G. 1978. British Ascomycetes. J. Cramer, Vaduz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson, O. E. and Hawksworth, D. L. 1987. Outline of the ascomycetes. Syst. Ascomycet.6: 259–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson, O. E. and Hawksworth, D. L. 1993. Outline of the ascomycetes. Syst. Ascomycet.12: 51–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fröhlich, J. and Hyde, K. D. 1994. NewOxydothis species associated with palm leaf spots in north Queensland, Australia. Mycol. Res.98: 213–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuckel, L. 1870. Symbolae mycologicae. Jahrb. Nass. Ver. Naturk.23–24: 1–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawksworth, D. L., Sutton, B. C. and Ainsworth, G. C. 1983. Ainsworth & Bisby's Dictionary of the fungi, 7th ed. Commonw. Mycol. Inst. Kew.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawksworth, D. L., Kirk, P. M., Sutton, B. C. and Pegler, D. N. 1995. Ainsworth & Bisby's Dictionary of the fungi, 8th ed. CAB International, Wallingford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Höhnel, F. von. 1919. Fragmente zur Mykologie XXIII. Sitzungsber. Akad. Wiss. Wien, Math.-Naturwiss. Kl., Abt. 1,128: 535–625.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyde, K. D. 1993a. Fungi from palms. VI. Reflections onOxydothis and related genera. Sydowia45: 204–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyde, K. D. 1993b. Fungi from palms. VII. The genusOxydothis from rachides of palms in north Queensland, including five new species. Sydowia45: 226–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyde, K. D. 1994a. Fungi from rachides ofLivistona in the Western Province of Papua New Guinea. Bot. J. Linn. Soc.116: 315–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyde, K. D. 1994b. Fungi from palms. XIII. The genusOxydothis, a revision. Sydowia46: 265–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyde, K. D. 1996. Fungi from palms. XXVII.Capsulospora gen. nov., with three new species. Sydowia48: 111–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyde, K. D., Fröhlich, J. and Taylor, J. E. 1996. Diversity of Ascomycetes on palms in the Tropics. In: Biodiversity of tropical microfungi. (ed. by Hyde, K. D.), pp. 141–156. Hong Kong Univ. Press, Hong Kong.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyde, K. D., Fröhlich, J. and Taylor, J. E. 1998. Fungi from palms. XXXV. Reflections on unitunicate ascomycetes with apiospores. Sydowia50: 21–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang, J. C., Kong, R. Y. C. and Hyde, K. D. 1998a. Studies on the Amphisphaeriales. 1. Amphisphaeriaceae (sensu stricto) and its phylogenetic relationships inferred from 5.8S rDNA and ITS2 sequences. Fungal Diversity1: 147–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang, J. C., Hyde, K. D. and Kong, R. Y. C. 1998b. Studies on the Amphisphaeriales 2. The Amphisphaeriaceae (sensu stricto). Mycol. Res.103: 53–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirschstein, W. 1939. Ueber neue, seltene und kritische Ascomyceten und Fungi imperfecti. II. Ann. Mycol.37: 88–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambotte, E. 1887. La flore mycologique de la Belgique, Suppl. 1. Mém. Soc. R. Sci. Lièg, sér. 2,14: 1–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. H. 1949. A revision of the classification of the Ascomycetes with special emphasis on the Pyrenomycetes. Mycologia41: 99–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munk, A. 1957. Danish Pyrenomycetes. Dansk Bot. Arkiv.17: 1–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penzig, O. and Saccardo, P. A. 1897. Diagnoses fungorum novorum in insula Java collectorum. Series secunda. Malpighia11: 491–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrak, F. 1923. Mykologische Notizen. VI. Numbers 201–300. Ann. Mycol.21: 182–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappaz, F. 1987 Taxonomie et nomenclature, des Diatrypacees à asques octospores. Mycol. Helvetica2: 285–648.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saccardo, P. A. 1978. Fungi veneti novi vel eritici vel mycologiae venetae addendi, 9. Michelia,1:361–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuels, G. J. and Rossman, A. Y. 1987. Studies in the Amphisphaeriaceae (sensu lato) 2.Leiosphaerella cocoes and two new species ofOxydothis on palms. Mycotaxon28: 461–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuels, G. J. and Rogerson, C. T. 1990. New Ascomycetes from theGuayana Highland. Mem. N.Y. Bot. Gard.64: 165–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schröter, J. 1897. Die Pilze Schlesiens. In: Kryptogamen-Flora on Shlesien, (ed. by Cohn, F.),3 (2): 1–285.

  • Spooner, B. M. 1986. New or rare British microfungi from, Esher Common, Surrey. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc.86: 401–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swart, H. J. 1981. Australian leaf-inhabiting fungi Xi.Phyllachora eucalypti. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc.76: 89–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winter, G. 1887. Die Pilze Deutschlands, Oesterreichs under Schweiz. 2. Abt., Ascomyceten: Gymnoasceen und Pyrenomyceten. In: Kryptogamen-Flora von Deutschland, Oesterreich und der Schweiz, (ed. Rabenhorst, L.), 2. Aufl.,1 (2): 1–928.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Kang, J.C., Hyde, K.D. & Kong, R.Y.C. Studies on the amphisphaeriales I. The clypeosphaeriaceae. Mycoscience 40, 151–164 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02464294

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02464294

Key Words

Navigation