Abstract
The quantity, quality and fitness for purpose of much school practical work has come in for some criticism. This paper reports on questionnaire and interview studies with trainee science teachers. The study examined the reasons and justifications that teachers give for the way in which they conduct practical work. The particular focus is on counter-normative behaviour and what the behaviour indicates about the status of empirical work and the purpose of evidence in science classrooms. The questionnaire was completed by 40 trainee teachers. The analysis of the questionnaire determined the number of teachers who had produced results fraudulently either on their own initiative or had been initiated into it by experienced teachers and/or laboratory technicians. From the questionnaire we were able to select a small sample who we interviewed in order to unpack further the questionnaire responses. In discussing our data, a case for the re-evaluation of practical work in science education will be made and it will be argued that science teacher behaviour is best understood anthropologically. Possible implications for mentoring and school based training are mentioned briefly.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aikenhead, G. (1996). Science education: Border crossing into the subculture of science.Studies in Science Education, 27, 1–52.
Barnes, B. (1985).About science. Oxford: Blackwell.
Brown, A., & Kompf, M. (1990). Lies teachers tell and the politics of language. In C. Day, M. Pope, & P. Denicolo (Eds.),Insight into teachers' thinking and practice (pp. 79–84). London: Falmer.
Department of Education and Science/Welsh Office (DES/WO). (1989).The national curriculum: Science. London: HMSO.
Department of Education and Science/Welsh Office (DES/WO). (1991).Science in the national curriculum. London: HMSO.
Department for Education/Welsh Office (DfE/WO). (1995).Science in the national curriculum. London: HMSO.
Ekman, P. (1985).Telling lies. New York: Norton.
Evans-Pritchard, E. E. (1937).Witchcraft, oracles and magic among the Azande. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Gough, N. (1993). Laboratories in schools: Material places, mythic spaces.Australian Science Teachers Journal, 39(2), 29–33.
Kouladis, V., & Ogborn, J. (1989). Philosophy of science: An empirical study of teachers' views.International Journal of Science Education, 11(2), 173–184.
Kouladis, V., & Ogborn, J. (1995). Science teachers' philosophical assumptions: How well do we understand them?International Journal of Science Education, 17(3), 273–283.
Lakin, S., & Wellington, J. (1994). Who will teach the nature of science? Teachers' views of science and their implication for science education.International Journal of Science Education, 16(2), 175–190.
Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979).Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Maddock, M. N. (1981). Science education: An anthropological viewpoint.Studies in Science Education, 8, 1–26.
Millar, R. (1996). A science curriculum for public understanding.School Science Review, 77(280), 7–18.
Mulkay, M. (1991). Norms and ideology. In M. Mulkay (Ed.),Sociology of science: A sociological pilgrimage (pp. 62–78). Milton Keynes: Open University Press. (Originally published as Norms and Ideology in Science.Social Science Information, 1976, 15(4), 637–656.)
Mulkay, M., & Gilbert, G. (1984).Opening Pandora's box: A sociological analysis of scientists' discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nott, M. (1994). Practical approaches to teaching and learning about the nature of science. In J. Wellington (Ed.),Secondary science: Contemporary issues and practical approaches (pp. 258–283). Routledge: London.
Nott, M., & Smith, R. (1995). “Talking your way out of it,” “rigging” and “conjuring”: What science teachers do when practicals “go wrong.”International Journal of Science Education, 17(3), 399–410.
Nott, M., & Welling, J. (1993). Your nature of science: An activity for science teachers.School Science Review, 75(270), 109–112.
Nott, M., & Welling, J. (1995a).Critical incidents in science. Milton Keynes: Open University (Science Document 14 in the Teaching Science in Secondary Schools series).
Nott, M., & Welling, J. (1995b). Critical incidents in the science classroom and the nature of science.School Science Review, 76(276), 41–46.
Nott, M., & Welling, J. (1996a). Ethics and morals in the science classroom. In M. Oakes (Ed.),Proceedings of the 1995 ASE INSET Services annual conference, The public understanding of science: A controversial issue? (pp. 23–32). Hatfield: Association for Science Education.
Nott, M., & Welling, J. (1996b). When the back box springs open: Practical work in school science and the nature of science.International Journal of Science Education, 18(7), 807–818.
Nott, M., & Wellington, J. (in press). Teaching teachers the nature of science. In W. McComas (Ed.),The nature of science in science education. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press.
Phelan, P., Davidson, A., & Cao, H. (1991). Students' multiple worlds: Negotiating the boundaries of family, peer and school cultures.Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 22(2), 224–250.
Pomeroy, D. (1993). Implications of teachers' beliefs about the nature of science: Comparison of the beliefs of scientists, secondary science teachers, and elementary teachers.Science Education, 77(3), 261–278.
Solomon, J. (1990).A report on the implementation of attainment target 17. Oxford: Oxford University, Department of Educational Studies.
Solomon, J. (1991).Exploring the nature of science. Glasgow: Blackie.
Solomon, J. (1992). Of science teaching.Education in Science, 148, 12–13.
Sutton, C. (1996). The scientific model, as a form of speech. In G. Welford, J. Osborne, & P. Scott (Eds.),Research in science education in Europe (pp. 143–152). London: Falmer.
Traweek, S. (1988).Beamtimes and lifetimes: The world of high energy physicists. London: Harvard University Press.
Ziman, J. M. (1967).Public knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ziman, J. M. (1984).An introduction to science studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nott, M., Wellington, J. Producing the evidence: Science teachers' initiations into practical work. Research in Science Education 27, 395–409 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02461761
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02461761