Skip to main content
Log in

Morphological analyses of urediniospores and teliospores in sevenPhragmidium species parasitic on ornamental roses

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Mycoscience

Abstract

Ornamental roses worldwide harbor 10Phragmidium species. Among theseP. americanum, P. fusiforme, P. montivagum, P. mucronatum, P. rosae-pimpinellifoliae, P. rosae-rugosae andP. tuberculatum are frequently reported; however, these species are morphologically similar and difficult to distinguish. For better circumscription and correct identification of the species, this study examined morphological features in urediniospores and teliospores of the sevenPhragmidium species collected on ornamental rose cultivars and wild species. The results indicated that some host-specific groups could be well circumscribed by the morphological properties of urediniospores and teliospores. However, without the precise identification of hosts, these morphological properties were not effective key characters for the identification of the species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  • Arthur, J. C. 1909. North America rose rusts. Torreya9: 21–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, J. C. 1934. Manual of the rust in United States and Canada, Hafner Publ. Co., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azbukina, Z. M. 1984. Key to the rust fungi of the Soviet Far East. Nauka, Moscow. (In Russian.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Beales, P., Cairns, T., Duncan, W., Fagan, G., Grant, W., Grapes, K., Harkness, P., Hughes, K., Mattock, J. and Ruston, D. 1998. Botanica's roses. Randomhouse Australia Pty. Ltd., Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, G. B. 1931.Phragmidium species of North America: Differential teliospore and aecial characters. Mycologia23: 433–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, G. B. and Hiratsuka, Y. 1983. Illustrated genera of rust fungi. Revised edn. Amer. Phytopathol. Soc., St. Paul, Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietel, P. 1905. Uber die arten der GattungPhragmidium. Hedwigia44: 112–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietel, P. 1906. Uber die arten der GattungPhragmidium II. Hedwigia44: 330–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gäumann, E. 1959. Die Rostpilze Metteleuropas. Beiträge zur Kryptogamenflora der Schweiz12: 1–1407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiratsuka, N. 1935.Phragmidium of Japan. Jpn. J. Bot.7: 227–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiratsuka, N., Sato, S., Katsuya, K., Kakishima, M., Hiratsuka, Y., Kaneko, S., Ono, Y., Sato, T., Harada, Y., Hiratsuka, T. and Nakayama, K. 1992. The rust flora of Japan. Tsukuba Shuppankai, Tsukuba.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiratsuka, Y. 1973. The nuclear cycle and terminology of spore state in Uredinales. Mycologia65: 432–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horst, R. K. 1983. Compendium of rose disease. Amer. Phytopathol. Soc., St. Paul, Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howden, J. C. W. and Jacobs, L. 1973. Report on the rust work at Bath. Ann. Natl. Rose Soc. England1973: 113–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, D. M., Ford-Ilyoid, B. V. and Butler, G. M. 1989. An aniline blue squash technique for observation of urediniospore germ pores. Mycol. Res.92: 230–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasai, M. 1910. On the Japanese species ofPhragmidium. Trans. Sapporo Nat. Hist. Soc.3: 25–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laundon, G. F. 1970. Additions to the rust fungi of New Zealand-5. New Zealand J. Bot.8: 310–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, J. 1886. Die Rostpilze derRosa- undRubus- Arten und die auf ihnen vorkomenden parasiten. Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges.3: 391–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ono, Y. 2000. Taxonomy of thePhakopsora ampelopsidis species complex on vitaceous hosts in Asia including a new species,P. euvitis. Mycologia92: 154–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, R. and M. Rix. 1994. Roses. Pan Books Ltd., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peck, C. H. 1876. Report of the botanist. Ann. Rep. New York State Mus.28: 31–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirone, P. P., Dodge, B. O. and Ricket, H. W. 1960. Disease and pests of ornamental plants. 3rd edn. Ronald Press Co., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfunder, M., Schürch, S. and Roy, B. A. 2001. Sequence variation and geographic distribution of pseudoflower-forming rust fungi (Uromyces pisi s. lat.) onEuphorbia cyparissias. Mycol. Res.105: 57–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rayner, R. W. 1970. A mycological colour chart. Commonwealth Mycological Institute, Kew.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, B. A., Vogler, D. R., Bruns, T. D. and Szaro, T. M. 1998. Cryptic species in thePuccinia monoica complex. Mycologia90: 846–853.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schröter, J. 1872. Die Brand- und Rostpilze Schlesiens. Abh. Schles. Ges. Nat. Med.1869–72: 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuessy, T. F. 1990. Plant taxonomy. The systematic evaluation of comparative data. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei, S. 1988. A taxonomic study of the genusPhragmidium of China. Mycosystema1: 179–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, L. 1989. SYSTAT: the system for statistics. Version 5.2 edition. Systat, Inc., Evanston, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, M. and Henderson, D. M. 1966. British rust fungi. Cambridge Univ. Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yoshitaka Ono.

About this article

Cite this article

Wahyuno, D., Kakishima, M. & Ono, Y. Morphological analyses of urediniospores and teliospores in sevenPhragmidium species parasitic on ornamental roses. Mycoscience 42, 519–533 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02460950

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02460950

Key Words

Navigation