Skip to main content
Log in

The “own-language preference”: Measures of relative language self-citation

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It has already been pointed out that the foreign language barrier is probably the greatest impediment to the free flow and transfer of information. This barrier is even growing as scientists of more and more countries publish in their own languages. Almost all studies addressing the language barrier problem were conducted from an Anglo-Saxon perspective, limiting their scope to English-language sources or English speakers. Little research has been devoted to studying and measuring language preference among non-English-speaking scholars.

This article reviews measures proposed in former studies such as the “relative own-language preference” indicator, and the “straight odds ratio”, pointing out their advantages and drawbacks. Two new refined measures (in both “raw” and normalised versions) are offered, claiming to be free of these drawbacks, and thus enabling a better and more reliable comparison between journals of different languages. Practical use of the proposed measures is illustrated by applying them to findings of a former language-citation study done on nine sociology journals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. A. Large,The Foreign-Language Barrier: Problems in Scientific Communication, André Deutch, London, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  2. P. Mayorcas-Cohen,Review of The Foreign-Language Barrier: Problems in Scientific Communication byJ. A. Large,Journal of Documentation, 41 (1985) 56–58.

    Google Scholar 

  3. D. N. Wood, The foreign-language problem facing scientists and technologists in the U.K.-report of a recent survey,Journal of Documentation, 23(2) (1967) 117–130.

    Google Scholar 

  4. H. Wellish, Linguistic and semantic problems in the use of English-language information services in non-English-speaking countries,International Library Review, 5 (1973) 147–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. M. Jagodzinski-Sigogneau, J. P. Courtial, B. Latour, How to measure the degree of independence of a research system?Scientometrics, 4 (1982) 119–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. J. Michel, Linguistic and political barriers in the international transfer of information in science and technology,Journal of Information Science, 5 (1982) 131–135.

    Google Scholar 

  7. D. Beadely, European elites envy American cohesion,Science, 260 (1993) 1738–1739.

    Google Scholar 

  8. S. Reguant, What lingua franca?Nature, 361 (1993) 107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. S. Reguant, English as lingua franca in geological scientific research; a bibliometric study,Scientometrics, 29 (1994) 335–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. J. E. Holmstrom, The foreign language barrier, In:J. Sherrod, A. Hodina (Eds)Reader in Science Information, Washington, D.C., Microcard, 1973, 94–103.

    Google Scholar 

  11. H. Engelbert, The terminological barrier to the understanding of scientific and technological literature,Translation News, 6(2) (1976) 2–10.

    Google Scholar 

  12. C. R. H. Inman, Scientific Publications in English and developing countries: a report of a survey of scientists' experiences,Journal of Information Science, 6 (1983) 159–164.

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. G. Thorp, H. Schur, D. Bawden, J. R. Joice, The foreign language barrier: a study among pharmaceutical research workers,Journal of Information Science, 14 (1988) 17–24.

    Google Scholar 

  14. E. Garfield, Do French scientists who publish outside of France and/or in English do better research? In:E. Garfield (Ed.)Essays of an Information Scientist, vol. 3, Philadelphia, ISI Press, 1980, 498–503.

    Google Scholar 

  15. G. K. L. Chan, The foreign language barrier in science and technology.International Library Review, 8 (1976) 317–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. M. Yitzhaki, The “language preference” in sociology: measures of “language self-citation”, “relative own-language preference indicator”, and “mutual use of languages”.,Scientometrics, 41 (1998) 243–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. R. Rousseau, Suggestions for research topics in citation and publication analysis,Library Science with a Slant to Documentation and Information Studies, 32 (1995) 3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  18. P. Earle, B. Vickery, Social science research literature use in the UK as indicated by citations,Journal of Documentation, 25 (1969) 123–141.

    Google Scholar 

  19. D. Nicholas, M. Ritchie,Literature and Bibliometrics, Clive Bingley, London, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  20. M. Yitzhaki, Subject dispersion and discipline affiliation.Scripta Hierosolymitana, (Publications of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem) 29 (1989) 217–249.

    Google Scholar 

  21. M. Yitzhaki, The language barrier in the humanities: the case of biblical studies, InL. Egghe, R. Rousseau (Eds),Informetrics 87/88; Selected Proceedings of the First International Conference on Bibliometrics, Diepenbeek, Belgium, Aug. 1987. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1988, 301–314.

    Google Scholar 

  22. A. Bookstein, M. Yitzhaki, Own-language preference: a new measure of “relative language selficitation”, In:Proceedings of the Seventh Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, Colima (Mexico) 1999 (to appear).

  23. F. S. Roberts,Measurement Theory, Addison-Wesley, London, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  24. L. Egghe, R. Rousseau, Partial orders and measures for language preferences, preprint, 1999.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Egghe, L., Rousseau, R. & Yitzhaki, M. The “own-language preference”: Measures of relative language self-citation. Scientometrics 45, 217–232 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02458434

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02458434

Keywords

Navigation