Skip to main content
Log in

Authorship patterns in Dutch sociology

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article looks at authorship patterns in Dutch sociology from 1939 to 1987. Results from co-author analysis show an increase in collaboration. Yet, most publications are still written by single authors. Network analysis of co-author relations for two seven year intervals and one six year interval distinguished 37 clusters with three or more members. Most clusters could be identified by experts. However, the clusters only partially matched their perception of research networks within Dutch sociology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. H. Zuckerman,Nobel Laureates: Sociological Studies of Scientific Collaboration, Ph.D. thesis, Columbia University, New York, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  2. K. W. Deutsch, J. Platt, D. Senghaas, Conditions favoring major advances in social science,Science, 171 (1971) 450–459.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. Platt, Is everything equal, or can there be scales of importance. In:K. W. Deutsch, A. S. Markovits, J. Platt,1900–1980; What, Who, Where, How?, Abt Books, Cambridge, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. De Haan,Research Groups in Dutch Sociology, Amsterdam: Thesis Publishers, Ph.D. thesis, 1994.

  5. T. D. Stokes, J. A. Hartley, Coauthorship, social structure and influence within specialties,Social Studies of Science, 19 (1989) 101–125.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. De Haan, F. L. Leeuw, C. Remery, Accumulation of advantage and disadvantage in research groups,Scientometrics, 29 (1994) 239–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. I. Ajiferuke, Q. Burell, J. Tague, Collaborative coefficient: a single measure of degree of collaboration in research,Scientometrics, 14 (1988) 421–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. H. P. F. Peters, A. F. J. Van Raan, Structuring scientific activities by co-author analysis; an exercise on a university faculty level,Scientometrics, 20 (1991) 235–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. R. P. Norris, Authorship patterns in CJNR: 1970–1991,Scientometrics, 28 (1993) 151–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. R. Burt,STRUCTURE; reference manual version 4.2, New York: Center for the Social Sciences, Columbia University, 1991, p. 76–82.

    Google Scholar 

  11. T. Schott, Network models, In:R. BURT, STRUCTURE; reference manual version 4.2, New York: Center for the Social Sciences, Columbia University, 1991, p. 107–206.

    Google Scholar 

  12. S. M. Lawini,Quality, Collaboration and Citation in Cancer Research; A bibliometric study, Ph.D. thesis, Florida State University, 1980.

  13. K. Subramanyam, Bibliometric of research collaboration; a review,Journal of Information Science, 6 (1983) 33–38.

    Google Scholar 

  14. N. Patel, Collaboration in the professional growth of American sociology,Social Science Information, 12 (No. 6) (1973) 77–92.

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. J. Meadows,Communication in Science, Butterworths, London, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  16. W. J. Broad, The publishing game: getting more for less,Science, 211 (1981) 1137–1139.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. D. O. Edge, M. J. Mulkay,Astronomy Transformed; The emergence of radio astronomy in Britain, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

De Haan, J. Authorship patterns in Dutch sociology. Scientometrics 39, 197–208 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02457448

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02457448

Keywords

Navigation