Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

View from afar: ‘Visible’ productivity of scientists in the developing world

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Much of what we know about science and technology in less developed countries comes from international databases such as bibliographies and citation, indices. However, it is not clear if researchers whose work appears in international databases are representative of scientists in the developing world as a whole, or whether they differ in terms of important social characteristics. A search of international databases on agriculture and natural resource management in Ghana, Kenya, and Kerala was used to compile a bibliography that could be compared with results from a face-to-face survey of researchers. Results indicate that, many of the characteristics of those who are internationally visible differ from the wider population of scientists. The implication is that the “view from afar” based exclusively on information drawn from international databases does not accurately reflect the population of researchers or domestic productivity in less developed countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. W. Shrum, Y. Shenhav, Science and technology in less developed countries, In:Handbook of Science, Technology, and Society.S. Jasanoff, G. Markle, J. Peterson, T. Pinch (Eds), Newbury Park, Sage (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. D. Frame, F. Narin, M. Carpenter, The distribution of world science,Social Studies of Science, 7 (1977) 501–516.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. Blickenstaff, M. J. Moravcsik, Scientific output in the third world,Scientometrics, 4 (1982). 135–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. H. C. Davis, Institutional analysis of mainstream science production in Sub-Saharan Africa, 1970–1979: A quantitative analysis,Scientometrics, 5 (1983) 163–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. T. Braun, W. Glänzel, A. Schubert, The newest version of the facts and figures on publication output and relative citation impact of 100 countries, 1981–1985,Scientometrics, 13 (1988) 181–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. B. K. Sen, V.V. Lakshmi, Indian periodicals in the Science Citation Index,Scientometrics, 23 (1992) 291–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. J. D. Frame, Problems in the use of literature-based indicators in developing countries, In:Science and Technology Indicators for Development H. Morita-Lou (Ed), Boulder, Colorado, Westview (1985) pp. 117–122.

    Google Scholar 

  8. W. W. Gibbs, Lost science in the third world,Scientific American, 273 (1995) No.2, 76–83.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. Gaillard,Scientists in the Third World, Lexington, University of Kentucky Press (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  10. R. Sancho, Misjudgements and shortcomings in the measurement of scientific activities in less developed countries.Scientometrics, 23 (1992) 221–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. S. Wasserman, K. Faust,Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  12. R. Arvanitis, J. Gaillard (Eds),Science Indicators for Developing Countries. Paris, OSTROM (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Y. Yuthavong, Bibliometric indicators of scientific activities in Thailand,.Scientometrics, 9 (1986) 139–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Y. Shenhav, D. Kamens, The cost of institutional isomorphism: Science in less developed countries,Social Studies of Science, 21 (1991) 527–545.

    Google Scholar 

  15. G. Whitney, Access to third world science in international scientific and technical bibliographic databases,Scientometrics, 23 (1992) 201–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. R. Meneghini, Brazilian production in biochemistry: The question of international versus domestic publication,Scientometrics, 23 (1992) 21–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. J. D. Frame, Measuring scientific activity in lesser developed countries,Scientometrics, 2 (1980) 133–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. N. Konrad, D. Wahl, Science, technology, and development indicators for third world countries: Possibilities for analysis and grouping,Scientometrics, 19 (1990) 245–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. F. Spagnolo, Brazilian scientists' publications and mainstream science: Some policy implications,Scientometrics, (1990) 18 205–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. H. C. Davis, T. O. Eisemon, Mainstream and non-mainsteam scientific literature in four peripheral Asian scientific communities,Scientometrics, 15 (1989) 215–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Sociology, Louisiana State University, 70803, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA

    Wesley Shrum

Authors
  1. Wesley Shrum
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shrum, W. View from afar: ‘Visible’ productivity of scientists in the developing world. Scientometrics 40, 215–235 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02457438

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02457438

Keywords

Search

Navigation