Skip to main content
Log in

Stochastic processes in postural center-of-pressure profiles

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The stochastic processes of postural center-of-pressure profiles were examined in 3- and 5-year-old children, young adult students (mean 20 years), and an elderly age group (mean 67 years). Subjects stood still in an upright bipedal stance on a force platform under vision and nonvision conditions. The time evolutionary properties of the center-of-pressure dynamic were examined using basic stochastic process models. The amount of motion of the center of pressure decreased with increments of age from 3 to 5 years to young adult but increased again in the elderly age group. The availability of vision decreased the amount of motion of the center of pressure in all groups except the 3-year-old group, where there was less motion of the center of pressure with no vision. The stochastic properties of the center-of-pressure dynamic were assessed using both a two-process, random-walk model of Collins and De Luca and an Ornstein-Uhlenbeck model that is linear and has displacement governed only by a single stiffness term in the random walk. The two-process open- and closed-loop model accounted for about 96% and the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck model 92% of the variance of the diffusion term. Diffusion parameters in both models showed that the data were correlated and that they varied with age in a fashion consistent with developmental accounts of the changing regulation of the degrees of freedom in action. The findings suggest that it is premature to consider the trajectory of the center-of-pressure as a two-process, open- and closed-loop random-walk model given that: (a) the linear Ornstein-Uhlenbeck dynamic equation with only two parameters accommodates almost as much of the variance of the random walk; and (b) the linkage of a discontinuity in the diffusion process with the transition of open- to closed-loop processes is poorly founded. It appears that the nature of the stochastic properties of the random walk of the center-of-pressure trajectory in quiet, upright standing remains to be elucidated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berg HC (1983) Random walks in biology, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein NA (1967) Co-ordination and the regulation of movements. Pergamon, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlton LG (1992) Visual processing time and the control of movement. In: Proteau L, Elliott D (eds) Vision and motor control, North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 3–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll JP, Freedman W (1993) Nonstationarity properties of postural sway. J Biomech 26: 409–416

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Collins JJ, De Luca CJ (1993) Open-loop and closed-loop control of posture: A random-walk analysis of center of pressure trajectories. Exp Brain Res 95: 308–318

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Collins JJ, De Luca CJ (1994) Random walking during quiet standing. Physic Rev Lett 73: 764–767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins JJ, De Luca CJ (1995a) The effects of visual input on open-loop and closed-loop postural control mechanisms. Exp Brain Res 103: 151–163

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Collins JJ De Luca CJ (1995b) Age-related changes in open-loop and closed-loop postural control mechanisms. Exp Brain Res 104: 480–492

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Emmerik REA van, Sprague RL, Newell KM (1993) Assessment of sway dynamics in tardive dyskinesia and developmental disability: sway profile orientation and stereotypy. Mov Disord 8: 305–314

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gardiner CW (1983) Handbook of stochastic methods. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldie PA, Bach TM Evans OM (1989) Force platform measures for evaluating postural control: reliability and validity. Arch Phys Med Rehab 70: 510–517

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harris GF, Riedel SA, Matesi D, Smith P (1993) Standing postural stability assessment and signal stationarity in children with cerebral palsy. IEE Trans Rehab Eng 1: 35–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King MB, Judge JO, Wolfson L (1994) Functional base of support decreases with age. J Gerontol Med Sci 49: M258-M263

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee D, Aronson E (1974) Visual proprioceptive control of standing in human infants. Percept Psychophys 15: 529–532

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipsitz LA, Goldberger AL (1992) Loss of “complexity” and aging. J Am Med Assoc 267: 1806–1809

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Murray MP, Seirewg AA, Sepic SB (1975) Normal postural stability and steadiness: quantitative assessment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 57: 510–516

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Newell KM, McDonald PV (1994) Learning to coordinate redundant biomechanical degrees of freedom. In: Swinnen S, Heuer H, Massion J, Casaer P (eds) Interlimb coordination: neural, dynamical and cognitive constraints. Academic Press, New York, pp 515–536

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell KM, Emmerik REA van, Lee D, Sprague RL (1993) On postural stability and variability. Gait Posture 4: 225–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newell KM, Slobounov SM, Slobounova E, Molenaar PCM (1995) Short-term nonstationarity and the development of postural control (in press)

  • Powell GM, Dzendolet E (1984) Power spectral density analysis of lateral human standing sway. J Mot Behav 16: 424–441

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Riach C, Hayes K (1987) Maturation of postural sway in young children. Dev Med Child Neurol 29: 650–658

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt RA (1977) Control processes in motor skills. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 4: 229–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon JH (1960) On the natural history of falls in old age. BMJ 4: 1685–1690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slobounov SM, Newell KM (1994a) Dynamics in 3- and 5-year-old children as a function of task constraints. Hum Mov Sci 13: 861–875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slobounov SM, Newell KM (1994b) Postural dynamics as a function of skill level and task constraints. Gait Posture 2: 85–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slobounov SM, Moss SA, Slobounova ES, Newell KM (1995) Aging and time to instability in posture (in press)

  • Winter DA (1990) Biomechanics and motor control of human movement (2nd edn), Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Woollacott M, Debu B, Mowatt M (1987) Neuromuscular control of posture in the infant and child: is vision dominant? J Mot Behav 19: 167–186

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. M. Newell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Newell, K.M., Slobounov, S.M., Slobounova, E.S. et al. Stochastic processes in postural center-of-pressure profiles. Exp Brain Res 113, 158–164 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02454152

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02454152

Key words

Navigation