Skip to main content
Log in

Oogenesis of campeloma rufum, a parthenogenetic snail

  • Published:
Zeitschrift für Zellforschung und Mikroskopische Anatomie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

  1. 1.

    The oogonia, as they arise from the germinal epithelium, are about 10 microns in diameter.

  2. 2.

    A growth period follows the oogonial division.

  3. 3.

    The diploid number of chromosomes is 12.

  4. 4.

    In the prophase stages no synapsis has been observed.

  5. 5.

    Secondary nucleoli develop in the oocyte and disappear before polocyte formation.

  6. 6.

    But one polocyte is formed. This takes place while the egg cell is still attached to the ovarian wall.

  7. 7.

    there is no reduction in chromosome number in the polocyte formation.

  8. 8.

    After extrusion of the polar body, the egg passes into the oviduct where the first cleavage is completed.

  9. 9.

    Many abortive ova are found in some individuals, particularly in late summer months.

  10. 10.

    All the evidences, herein presented, support the view thatCampeloma rufum reproduces normally by a diploid parthenogenesis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

  • Alonte, Fidel H.: Biology ofVivipara angularis Müller, a common freshwater snail in Laguna De Bay. Philippine Agricult.19 (5), 307–325 (1930).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ancel, P.: Histogenèse et structure de la glande hermaphrodite d'Helix pomatia (Linn.). Archives de Biol.19, 389–652 (1903).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ankel, W. E.: Zur Befruchtungsfrage beiViviparus viviparus L. Senckenbergiana7, 37–54 (1925).

    Google Scholar 

  • Annandale, N. andR. B. S. Sewell: The banded pondsnail of India (Vivipara bengalensis). Rec. Indiana Mus.22, 215–292 (1921).

    Google Scholar 

  • Artom, C.: Ovogenesis abortiva e spermatogenesi aberrante in molluschi prosobranchi del genereValvata. Rend. Accad. Lincei (6)17 (6), 481–485 (1933).

    Google Scholar 

  • Boycott, A. E.: Parthenogenesis inPaludestriana jenkinsi. J. of Conch.16 (2), 54 (1919).

    Google Scholar 

  • Conklin, E. G.: Karyokinesis and cytokinesis in the maturation, fertilization and cleavage ofCrepidula and other gastropods. Philadelphia J. Acad. nat. Sci., II. s.,12, 1–121 (1902).

    Google Scholar 

  • Crabb, E. D.: The fertilization process in the snail,Lymnaea stagnalis appressa Say. Biol. Bull. Mar. biol. Labor. Wood's Hole53, 67, 108 (1927).

    Google Scholar 

  • Garnault, P.: Sur les phenomènes de la fécondation chez l'Helix aspersa et l'Arion empiricorum. Zool. Anz.11 (1889).

  • Gatenby, J. B.: Cytoplasmic inclusions in the germ cells of snails. Part II.Helix aspersa. Quart. J. microsc. Sci.62, 556–611 (1917).

    Google Scholar 

  • —: Sex change in mollusca. Nature110, 544 (1922).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, H. E.: A cytological study of the egg ofCumingia. Arch. Zellforsch.4, 243–253 (1910).

    Google Scholar 

  • Krull, H.: Anatomische Untersuchungen an einheimischen Prosobranchiern und Beiträge zur Phylogenie der Gastropoden. Zool. Jb., Abt. Anat.60, 399–464 (1935).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lany, E.: La parthénogenèse chez les mollusques. J. de Conchyliologie Paris79 (2), 136–146 (1935).

    Google Scholar 

  • Leydig, F.: ÜberPaludina vivipara. Ein Beitrag zur näheren Kenntnis des Tieres in embryologischer, anatomischer und histologischer Beziehung. Z. Zool.2, 125–197 (1850).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattox, N. T.: Sex organs and reproduction inCampeloma rufum, a fresh water snail. Anat. Rec., I. s.67 (1), 77 (1936).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattox, N. T.: Morphology ofCampeloma rufum, a Parthenogenetic Snail. (In Press 1938).

  • Pennypacker, M. I.: The germ cells in the hermaphroditic gland ofPolygyna appressa. J. Morph. a. Physiol.49 (2), 415–454 (1930).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popoff, M.: Eibildung beiPaludina viviparo und Chromidien beiPaludina undHelix. Arch. mikrosk. Anat.70, 43–129 (1907).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quick, H. E.: Parthenogenesis inPaludestrius jenkinsi from brachish water. J. of Conch.16 (3), 97 (1920).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhein, A.: Diploide Parthenogenese beiHydrobia jenkinsi Smith (Prosobranchia). Naturwiss.23, 100 (1935).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robson, G. C.: On the anatomy ofPaludestrina jenkinsi. Ann. a. Mag. nat. History, IX. s.5, 425–431 (1920).

    Google Scholar 

  • —: Parthenogenesis in the molluscPaludestrina jenkinsi. Brit. J. exper. Biol.1, 65–78 (1923).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, L. W.: Introduction to Cytology, 3rd Ed, New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smallwood, W. M.: Maturation, fertilization and early cleavage ofHaminea solitaria. Bull. Comp. Mus. Harvard Coll.45, 261–318 (1904).

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Cleave, H. J. andD. A. Altringer Studies on the life cycle ofCampeloma rufum, a fresh-water snail Amer. Naturalist71, 167–184 (1937).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitney, D. D.: Observations on the maturation stages of the parthenogenetic and sexual eggs ofHydatina senta. J. of exper. Zool.6 (1), 137–146 (1909).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

With 30 figures in the text.

Contributions from the Zoological Laboratory of the University of Illinois, No. 513.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mattox, N.T. Oogenesis of campeloma rufum, a parthenogenetic snail. Z.Zellforsch 27, 455–464 (1937). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02451192

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02451192

Keywords

Navigation