Skip to main content
Log in

Rapid detection ofBrucella melitensis from blood cultures by a commercial system

  • Notes
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To assess the capability of the Peds Plus medium of the Bactec 9240 blood culture system to recoverBrucella melitensis within the routine seven-day protocol used by most clinical microbiology laboratories, inoculated blood culture bottles were monitored by the Bactec 9240 instrument for four weeks, and blind subcultures were performed once a week. A total of 2579 blood cultures were drawn, 42 (1.6%) of which were positive forBrucella melitensis. Forty-one of the 42 (97.6%) positive cultures were detected by the Bactec 9240 instrument within two to six days; a single positive culture was missed by the instrument and detected by blind subculture performed on day 7.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abramson O, Rosenvasser Z, Block C, Dagan R: Detection and treatment of brucellosis by screening a population at risk. Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal 1991, 10: 434–438.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Moyer N, Holcomb PLA:Brucella. In: Murray PR, Baron EJ, Pfaller MA, Tenover FC, Yolken RH (ed): Manual of clinical microbiology. American Society for Microbiology, Washington DC, 1995, p. 549–555.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Alton GG, Jones LM: Bacteriological methods. In: Laboratory techniques in brucellosis. World Health Organization, Geneva, 1967, p. 17.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Yagupsky P: Detection ofBrucella melitensis by BACTEC NR660 blood culture system. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1994, 32: 1899–1901.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Nolte FS, Williams JM, Jerris RC, Morello JA, Leitch CD, Matushek S, Schwabe LD, Dorigan F, Cocka FE: Multicenter clinical evaluation of a continuous monitoring blood culture system using a fluorescent-sensor technology. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1993, 29: 2245–2249.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Etemadi H, Raissadat A, Pickett MJ, Zafari Y, Vahedifar P: Isolation ofBrucella spp. from clinical specimens. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1984, 20: 586.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gotuzzo E, Carrillo C, Guerra J, Llosa L: An evaluation of diagnostic methods for brucellosis: the value of bone marrow culture. Journal of Infectious Diseases 1986, 153: 122–125.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kolman S, Maayan MC, Gotesman G, Rozenszajn LA, Wolach B, Lang R: Comparison of the BACTEC and lysis concentration methods for recovery ofBrucella species from clinical specimens. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases 1991, 10: 647–648.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Young EJ: An overview of human brucellosis. Clinical Infectious Diseases 1995, 21: 283–290.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Solomon HM, Jackson D: Rapid diagnosis ofBrucella melitensis in blood: some operational characteristics of the BacT/Alert. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1992, 30: 222–224.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Shigei JT, Shimabukuro JA, Pezzlo MT, de la Maza LM, Peterson EM: Value of terminal subcultures for blood cultures monitored by BACTEC 9240. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1995, 33: 1385–1388.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yagupsky, P., Peled, N., Press, J. et al. Rapid detection ofBrucella melitensis from blood cultures by a commercial system. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 16, 605–607 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02447926

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02447926

Keywords

Navigation