Skip to main content
Log in

Two Methods for reconstructing the empirical mortality profile

  • Published:
Human Evolution

Abstract

This paper goes one step beyond the age determination of the individual skeleton. It presents two methods for the reconstruction of the distribution of the age at death in a sample of skeletons. It is shown that the maximum likelihood method, in spite of certain weaknesses, is superior to the traditionally used proportional method, especially in situations when the analyzed sample consists of skeletons with very different conditions of preservation and thus age intervals of differing lengths. The maximum likelihood method eliminates a bias towards increased average age at death which is introduced by the proportional method. An analysis of an empirical example indicates that the difference between results obtained using the two methods increases with increasing age.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bennike P., 1985.Palaeopathology of Danish Skeletons: A Comparative Study of Demography. Disease and Injury. København, Akademisk Forlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boldsen J.L., 1984.Problems in the reconstruction of vital statistics in past populations. Symposium i anvendt statistik 1984, Aarhus.

  • Boldsen J.L., 1987.Population structure and height in history. Unpublished manuscript.

  • Boldsen J.L. &Jeune B., 1985.Alderen for menopausens indtræden. Ugeskrift for læger, 147: 3641–3642.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferembach M., Schwidetzky I. &Stloukal M., 1980.Recommendations for age and sex diagnosis of skeletons. J. Hum. Evol., 9: 517–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helm S. &Prydsø U., 1979.Assessment of age at death from mandibular molar attrition in medieval Danes. Scand. J. Dent. Res., 87: 79–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kieffer-Olsen J., Boldsen J.L. &Pentz P., 1986.En nyfundet kirke ved Bygholm. Vejle amts årbog, 1986, 24–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lassen A., 1965.Fald of fremgang. Træk af befolkningsudviklingen i Danmark 1645–1960. Aarhus. Jysk historisk selskab.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mascie-Taylor C.G.N. &Boldsen J.L., 1986.Reecalled age at menarche in Britain. Ann. Hum. Biol., 13: 253–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Møller-Christensen V., 1958.Bogen om Æbelholt Kloster. København. Dansk videnskabs Forlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turnbull B.W., 1976.The empirical distribution function with arbitrarily grouped, censored and truncated data. J. Royal Statistical Society B, 39: 290–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ubelaker D.H., 1974.Reconstruction of Demographic profiles from Ossuary Skeletal Samples. Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology, no. 18, Washington, D.C.

  • Welinder S., 1979.Prehistoric Demography. Acta Archaeol Lundensia, ser. 8, Minore 80, Lund.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boldsen, J.L. Two Methods for reconstructing the empirical mortality profile. Hum. Evol. 3, 335–342 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02447215

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02447215

Key words

Navigation