Skip to main content
Log in

Pollen selection — past, present and future

  • Minireview
  • Published:
Sexual Plant Reproduction Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A series of studies, recently reviewed, has established that approximately 60% of the structural genes which are expressed in the sporophytic portion of the angiosperm life cycle are also expressed and exposed to selection in the pollen. Given the haploidy and large population sizes of pollen grains, a substantial portion of the sporophytic genome could thus be periodically exposed to a bacterial type of mass screening. This extraordinary possibility is often subject to some skepticism which may, of course, be justified. However, recent attempts to apply models appear to be inappropriate in this context, in part because these attempts overlook an important source of genetic variation, and also because they assume fixed values for selection and fitness. More recently, studies of pollen/pollen interactions have suggested that what Linskens termed the “programic phase” may represent an arena for important, and largely unexplored phenomena, some of which are discussed here.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brink RA, MacGillivray JH (1924) Segregation for the waxy locus in maize pollen and differential development of the male gametophyte. Am J Bot 11:465–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carney S, Cruzan M, Arnold M (1994) Reproductive interactions between hybridizing irises: analyses of pollen tube growth and fertilizing ability. Am J Bot 81:1169–1175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charlesworth B (1987) The heritability of fitness. In: Bradbury WJ, Anderson MB (eds) Sexual selection: testing the alternatives. Wiley, New York, pp 21–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Charlesworth D, Charlesworth B (1992) The effects of selection in the gametophyte stage on mutational load. Evolution 46:703–720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charlesworth D, Morgan M, Charlesworth B (1990) Inbreeding depression, genetic load, and the evolution of outcrossing rates in a multilocus system with no linkage. Evolution 44:1469–1479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook S, Lefebune C, McNeilly T (1972) Competition between metal tolerant and normal plant populations on normal soil Evolution 26:366–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruzan MB (1990) Pollen-pollen and pollen-style interactions during pollen tube growth inErythronium grandiflorum (Liliaceae). Am J Bot 77:116–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devlin B, Ellstrand N (1990) The development and application of a refined method for estimating gene flow from angiosperm paternity analysis. Evolution 44:248–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haldane JBS (1924) A mathematical theory of natural and artificial selection Trans Cambridge Philos Soc 23:19–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper JL (1977) Population biology of plants. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartl D, Clark A (1989) Principles of population genetics, 2nd edn. Sinauer, Sunderland, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • Herben T, Krahulec F (1990) Competitive hierarchies, reversals of rank order and the de Wit approach: are they compatible? Oikos 58:254–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Hormaza, JI, Herrero M (1994) Gametophytic competition and selection. In: Williams EG, Clarke AE, Knox RB (eds) Genetic control of self-incompatibility and reproductive development in flowering plants. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 372–400

    Google Scholar 

  • Hormaza, JI, Herrero M (1996) Male gametophyte selection as a plant breeding tool. Sci Hortic (in press)

  • Johnson CM, Mulcahy DL, Galinat WC (1978) Male gametophyte in maize: influences of the gametophytic genotype. Theor Appl Genet 48:299–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones DF (1928) Selective fertilization. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, III

    Google Scholar 

  • Landi PA, Frascaroli E (1988) Polen-style interactions inZea mays L In: Cresti M, Gori P, Pacini E (eds) Sexual reproduction in higher plants. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 315–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Linskens HF, Pfahler PF (1977) Genotypic effects on the amino acid relationships in maize (Zea mays L.) pollen and style. Theor Appl Genet 50:173–177

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall DL, Folsom M (1991) Mate choice in plants: an anatomical to population perspective. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 22:37–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall C, Ludlam D (1989) The pattern of abortion of developing seeds inLolium perenne. Ann Bot 63:19–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Ottaviano E, Sari Gorla M, Mulcahy DL (1980) Pollen tube growth rate inZea mays: implications for genetic improvement of crops. Science 210:437–438

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker MA (1992) Outbreeding depression in a selfing annual. Evolution 46:837–841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfahler PL (1967) Fertilization ability of maize pollen grains. II. Pollen genotype, female sporophyte and pollen storage interactions. Genetics 57:513–521

    Google Scholar 

  • Reice SR (1994) Nonequilibrium determinants of biological community structure. Am Sci 82:424–435

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson T, Stephenson A (1992) Effects of parentage and size of the pollen load on progeny performance inCampanula americana. Evoution 46:1731

    Google Scholar 

  • Sari-Gorla M, Ottaviano E, Fiani D (1975) Genetic variability of gametophytic growth rate in maize. Theor Appl Genet 46: 289–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt J, Gamble SE (1990) The effect of distance from the parental site in offspring performance and inbreeding depression inImpatiens capensis: a test of the local adaptation hypothesis. Evolution 44:2022–2030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scudo FM (1967) Selection on both haplo- and diplophase. Genetics 56:693–704

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Searcy KB, Mulcahy DL (1985) Pollen tube competition and selection for metal tolerance inSilene dioica (Carophyllaceae) andMimulus guttatus (Scrophulariaceae). Am J Bot 72:1695–1699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinervo B, Lively CM (1996) The rock-paper-scissors game and the evolution of alternative male strategies. Nature 380:240–243

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Snow A (1986) Pollination dynamics inEpilobium canum (Onagraceae): c consequences for gametophytic selection. Am J Bot 73:139–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snow A (1990) Effects of pollen load size and number of donors on sporophyte fitness in wild radish (Raphanus raphanistrum). Am Nat 136:742–758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snow A, Spira T (1991) Pollen vigor and the potential for sexual selection in plants. Nature 352:796–797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson JD (1989) Germination schedules of pollen grains: implications for pollen selection. Evolution 43:220–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh NE, Charlesworth D (1992) Evolutionary interpretations of differences in pollen tube growth rates. Q Rev Biol 67:19–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waser NM, Price MV (1989) Optimal outcrossing inIpomopsis aggregata: seed set and offspring fitness. Evolution 43:1097–1110

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David L. Mulcahy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mulcahy, D.L., Sari-Gorla, M. & Mulcahy, G.B. Pollen selection — past, present and future. Sexual Plant Reprod 9, 353–356 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02441955

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02441955

Key words

Navigation