Abstract
An electrically-operated hand, controlled by myopotentials, has been fitted with strain gauges in the index finger which measure the gripping force between thumb and index finger. These strain gauges cause an electrical stimulus to be applied to the skin directly above the median nerve. This stimulus consists of a series of pulses with the pulse repetition rate increasing as the pinch force increases. Patients fitted with prostheses incorporating this feedback report an improved level of confidence when using the prosthesis.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agnew, P. andShannon, G. F. (1978) Functional performance of a myofeedback prosthetic hand (to be published)
Davey, E. C. (1974) A myoelectrically controlled arm prosthesis with sensory feedback sharing common electrodes. M.Sc.E. Thesis, University of New Burnswick.
Davey, E. C. andShannon, G. F. (1974) Sensory feedback, University of New Brunswick Biol. Eng. Institute Progress Report 13.
Dorcas, D. S. andScott, R. N. (1966) A three-state myoelectric control.Med. & Biol. Eng. 4, 367–371. Technical literature Fidelity VA NU hand.
Geddes, L. A. (1972)Electrodes and the measurement of biological events, Wiley, New York. Technical literature Otto Bock.
Rohland, T. A. (1972) Sensory feedback system for a myoelectrically controlled arm prosthesis, M.Sc.E. Thesis, University of New Brunswick.
Shannon, G. F. (1976) A comparison of alternate means of providing sensory feedback on upper limb prostheses.Med. & Biol. Eng. 14, 289–294.
Shannon, G. F. (1975) The case for feedback on upper arm prostheses.Elec. Trans. I.E. Aust. EE11, 36–38.
Shannon, G. F. (1978) Siting electrodes for myoelectrically controlled prostheses incorporating electrical stimulus sensory feedback (to be published)
Shannon, G. F. andKruger, S. (1978) A myofeedback control system trainer (to be published)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shannon, G.F. A myoelectrically-controlled prosthesis with sensory feedback. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 17, 73–80 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02440956
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02440956