Abstract
The extent to which personality, social behavior, and sexuality differed in undergraduate males under two different types of recruitment, volunteer and nonvolunteer, was investigated. Nonvolunteers (N=160) were ostensibly recruited for a study on personality, and volunteers (N=204) were overtly recruited for a study on human sexuality. Both samples completed the same personality, social behavior, and sexuality questionnaires. Volunteers were found to be more sexually experienced, more interested in sexual variety, and more erotophilic than the nonvolunteers. In addition and contrary to most prior research, the volunteer and nonvolunteer samples also differed in personality and social behavior, with the volunteers being higher in sensation seeking and lower on measures of social conformity and rule-following behavior than the nonvolunteers. Results extend prior research suggesting limits to the generalizability of some human sexuality research.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barker, J. W., and Perlman, D. (1975). Volunteer bias and personality traits in sexual standards research.Arch. Sex. Behav. 4: 161–171.
Bauman, K. E. (1973). Volunteer bias in a study of sexual knowledge, attitudes, and behavior.J. Marr. Fam. 35: 27–31.
Bentler, P. M. (1968). Heterosexual behavior assessment — 1: Males.Behav. Res. Ther. 6: 21–25.
Bogaert, A. F. (1992). Volunteer bias in sex research: An exploratory study of self-reported autoerotic experiences.Can. J. Hum. Sex. 1: 207–211.
Bogaert, A. F. (1993a). The sexual media: The role of individual differences Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wester Ontario, London, Canada.
Bogaert, A. F. (1993b). Personality, delinquency, and sexuality: Data from three Canadian samples.Pers. Indiv. Diff. 15: 353–356.
Bogaert, A. F. (1994). An individual difference approach to the sexual media. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Bogaert, A. F., and Fisher, W. A. (1994). Predictors of males' sexual partners in the era of AIDS. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Bogaert, A. F., and Rushton, J. P. (1989). Sexuality, delinquency, andr/K reproductive strategies: Data from a Canadian University sample.Pers. Indiv. Differ. 10: 1071–1077.
Christie, R., and Geis, F. C. (1970).Studies in Machiavellianism Academic Press, New York.
Claridge, G. (1983). The Eysenck Psychoticism Scale. In Butcher, J. N., and Speilberger, C. D. (eds.),Advances in Personality Assessment, Vol. 2, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 71–114.
Eysenck, H. J. (1976).Sex and Personality, Open Books, London.
Eysenck, H. J., and Eysenck, S. B. G. (1975).Manual of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire, Hodder & Stoughton, London.
Eysenck, H. J., and Eysenck, S. B. G. (1976).Psychoticism as a Personality Dimension, Hodder & Stoughton, London.
Farkas, F. M., Sine, L. F., and Evans, I. M. (1978). Personality, sexuality, and demographic differences between volunteers and nonvolunteers for a laboratory study of male sexual behaviour.Arch. Sex. Behav. 7: 513–520.
Fisher, W. A., Byrne, D., White, L., and Kelley, K. (1988). Erotophobia — Erotophilia as a dimension of personality.J. Sex. Res. 25: 123–151.
Hindelang, M. J., Hircshi, T., and Weis, J. G. (1979). Correlates of delinquency: The illusion of discrepancy between self-report and official measures.Am. Sociol. Rev. 44: 995–1014.
Jackson, D. N. (1967).Manual for the Personality Research Form, Research Psychologists Press, Goshen, NY.
Jackson, D. N. (1984).Personality Research Form Manual, Research Psychologists Press, Port Huron, MI.
Kaats, G. R., and Davis, K. E. (1971). Effects of volunteer biases in studies of sexual behavior and attitudes.J. Sex Res. 7: 26–34.
Kenrick, D. T., Stringfield, D. O., Wagenhals, W. L., Dahl, R., and Ransdell, H. J. (1980). Sex differences, androgyny and approach responses to erotica: A new variation on an old volunteer problem.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 38: 517–524.
Koss, M. (1993). Detecting the scope of rape: A review of prevalence research methods.J. Interpers. Violence 8: 198–222.
Koss, M. P., and Oros, C. J. (1982). Sexual Experiences Survey: A research instrument investigating sexual aggression and victimization.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 50: 455–457.
Malamuth, N. M. (1986). Predictors of naturalistic sexual aggression.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 50: 953–962.
Malamuth, N. M. (1989a). The Attraction to Sexual Aggression Scale: Part 1.J. Sex. Res. 26: 26–49.
Malamuth, N. M. (1989b). The Attraction to Sexual Aggression Scale: Part 2.J. Sex Res. 26: 324–354.
Morokoff, P. J. (1986). Volunteer bias in the psychophysiological study of female sexuality.J. Sex Res. 22: 35–51.
Mosher, D. L., and Anderson, R. D. (1986). Macho personality, sexual aggression, and reactions to guided images of rape.J. Res. Pers. 20: 70–94.
Mosher, D. L., and Sirkin, M. (1984). Measuring a macho personality constellation.J. Res. Pers. 18: 150–163.
Nederhof, A. (1983). The effects of material incentives in mail surveys: Two studies.Public Opinion Quart. 47: 103–111.
Nirenberg, T. D., Wincze, J. P., Bansal, S., Liepman, M. R., Engle-Friedman, M., and Begin, A. (1991). Volunteer bias in a study of male alcoholics' sexual behavior.Arch. Sex. Behav. 20: 371–379.
Rushton, J. P., and Chrisjohn, R. D. (1980). Extraversion, Neuroticism, Psychoticism and Self-Reported Delinquency.Pers. Indiv. Diff. 2: 11–20.
Rushton, J. P., Chrisjohn, R. D., and Fekkon, G. C. (1981). The altruistic personality and the Self-Report Altruism Scale.Pers. Indiv. Diff. 2: 293–302.
Shepher, J., and Reisman, J. (1985). Pornography: A sociobiological attempt at understanding.Ethnol. Sociobiol. 6: 103–114.
Saunders, D. M., Fisher, W. A., Hewitt, E. C., and Clayton, J. P. (1985). A method for empirically assessing volunteer selection effects: Recruitment procedures and responses to erotica.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 49: 1703–1712.
Tims, A. R., Jr., Swart, C., and Kidd, R. F. (1976). Factors affecting predecisional communication behavior after helping requests.Hum. Commun. Res. 2: 271–280.
Winett, R. A., Stewart, G., Majors, and James, S. (1978). Prompting techniques to increase the return rate of mailed questionnaires.J. Appl. Behav. Anal. 11: 437.
Wolchik, S. A., Braver, S. L., and Jensen, K. (1985). Volunteer bias in erotica research: Effects of intrusiveness of measure and sexual background.Arch. Sex. Behav. 14: 93–107.
Wolchik, S. A., Spencer, S. L., & Lisi, I. S. (1983). Volunteer bias in research employing vaginal measures of sexual arousal: Demographic, sexual and personality characteristics.Arch. Sex. Behav. 12: 399–408.
Zuckerman, M. (1979).Sensation Seeking: Beyond the Optimal Level of Arousal Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This paper was completed while the author was a Social Science and Humanities Research Council of Canada Postdoctoral Fellow.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bogaert, A.F. Volunteer bias in human sexuality research: Evidence for both sexuality and personality differences in males. Arch Sex Behav 25, 125–140 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02437932
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02437932